I am delighted to have a guest post from Donal Griffin of Legacy Law on the evolution of the dependency and interdependency rules surrounding receipt of superannuation death benefits. Here is Donal’s summary of a an ATO decision from 2014:
On 18 July 2014, the ATO released ATO Interpretive Decision 2014/22 which confirmed their view that a child who cared for an elderly parent was a dependant and in an inter-dependant relationship.
The writer suggests that it is a sign of the times. 10 years ago, people were keen to show that grandparents’ support for their children by paying school fees meant that the grandchildren were financially dependant with the result that superannuation could be paid to them tax free. The ATO have issued rulings to discourage attempts to contrive dependency.
In February 2014, the ATO showed that certain adult children could be dependants. In ATO ID 2014/6, the Commissioner found that “The Youth Allowance payments the taxpayer received were calculated at a lower ‘at home’ rate as opposed to the higher ‘independent’ rate. This indicates that the taxpayer was substantially financially dependent. A comparison of the level of financial support provided by the taxpayer’s parent with that provided by the Youth Allowance payments also indicates that the taxpayer was financially dependent.”
Private Binding Ruling 67744 dealt with a situation where the parent died. The Commissioner found that all of the requirements of inter-dependency were met.
Previously, it was made clear that support and care must be significant and a link to being unwell or suffering emotionally. This was to be beyond the support one would hope to get from a friend or flatmate who prepares an occasional meal.
The AAT in Malek’s case considered whether the support was necessary. In the later Private Binding Ruling 91657, the above authorities were considered and the net question was whether the person would be able to meet their daily basic necessities (shelter, food, clothing etc) without the additional financial support.
Where a parent needs support, most people would consider it part of the usual familial relationship to support them. However, the facts need to demonstrate that what might be termed a normal familial relationship has changed so that there is a demonstrable mutual commitment to a shared life.
It seems that moving in with a parent and supporting them with a commitment to continue to look after them for the rest of their life is sufficient to establish interdependency. The writer suggests that this relationship can helpfully be confirmed in writing by the parent in the course of their estate planning.
Donal Griffin is a Director of Legacy Law Pty Limited and can be contacted at 02 918803980 or at dgriffin@legacylaw.com.au.
Are you looking for an advisor that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? Then why not contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.
Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP
Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™
Tel: 02 98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299
PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153
5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154
Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572
This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.
