#SMSF Alert : ATO guidance on related party SMSF loans (LRBAs) – Update 2025-26


Rate for 2025-26 Related Property LRBA is 8.95% and Listed Shares 10.95%

Old Rate for 2024-25 Related Property LRBA was 9.35% and Listed Shares 11.35%

The ATO have issued long-awaited guidelines providing SMSF trustees with suggested ‘Safe Harbour’ loan terms on which trustees may use to structure a related party Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangement (LRBA) consistent with dealing at arm’s length with that related party.

By implementing these “Safe Harbour” loan terms, SMSF trustees are assured by the ATO Commissioner that

..for income tax purposes, the Commissioner accepts that an LRBA structured in accordance with this Guideline is consistent with an arm’s length dealing and that the NALI provisions do not apply purely because of the terms of the borrowing arrangement.

It is absolutely essential that all non-bank SMSF borrowing arrangements (LRBAs)  be reviewed prior now extended to 1 Jan 2017

 Where has this come from?

The ATO first released and then re-issued ATO Interpretative Decisions in 2015 (ATO ID 2015/27 and ATO ID 2015/28), dealing with Non-Arm’s Length Income(NALI) derived from listed shares and real property purchased by an SMSF under an LRBA involving a related party lender – where the terms of the loan were not deemed to be on commercial terms.

These ATOIDs state that the use of a non-arm’s length LRBA gives rise to NALI in the SMSF. Broadly, the rationale for this view is that the income derived from an investment that was purchased using a related party LRBA, where the terms of the loan are more favorable to the SMSF, is more than the income the fund would have derived if it had otherwise being dealing on an arm’s length basis.

NALI is taxed at the top marginal tax rate, currently 47% – regardless of whether the income is derived while the fund is in accumulation phase where tax is normally 15%  or in pension phase when the income would usually be tax exempt.

After that bombshell, the ATO announced that it would not take proactive compliance action from a NALI perspective against an SMSF trustee where an existing non-commercial related party LRBA was already in place, as long as such an LRBA was brought onto commercial terms or wound up by 30 June 2016.

The Nitty Gritty Details of the Safe Harbour Steps

The ATO has issued Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2016/5. As a result, provided an SMSF trustee follows these guidelines in good faith, they can be assured that (for income tax compliance purposes) their arrangement will be taken to be consistent with an arm’s length dealing.

The ‘Safe Harbour’ provisions are for any non-bank LRBA entered into before 30 June 2016, and also those that will be entered into after 30 June 2016.

Broadly, this PCG outlines two ‘Safe Harbours’. These Safe Harbours provide the terms on which SMSF trustees may structure their LRBAs. An LRBA structured in accordance with the relevant Safe Harbour will be deemed to be consistent with an arm’s length dealing and the NALI provisions will not apply due merely to of the terms of the borrowing arrangement.

The terms of the borrowing under the LRBA must be established and maintained throughout the duration of the LRBA in accordance with the guidelines provided.

 Safe Harbour 1Safe Harbour 2
Asset TypeInvestment in Real PropertyInvestment in a collection of Listed Shares or Units
Interest RateNote: as of 10 Jan 2019: The RBA no longer round the rates to the nearest 5 basis points.RBA Indicator Lending Rates for banks providing standard variable housing loans for investors. Use the May rate immediately preceding the tax year.
(2015/16 year = 5.75%)(2016-17 year = 5.65%)(2017-18 year = 5.8%)(2018-19 year = 5.8%)(2019-2020 year = 5.94%)(2020-2021 year = 5.1%) (2021-2022 year = 5.1%)(2022-2023 year = 5.35%)2024 FY = 8.85% (2024-25 year = 9.35%) (2025-26 year 8.95%)
Same as Real Property + a margin of 2%
Fixed / VariableInterest rate may be fixed or variable.Interest rate may be fixed or variable.
Term of LoanVariable interest rate loans:Original loan – 15 year maximum loan term (both residential and commercial).Re-financing – maximum loan term is 15 years less the duration(s) of any previous loan(s) in respect of the asset (for both residential and commercial).Fixed interest rate loan:

Rate may be fixed for a maximum period of 5 years and must convert to a variable interest rate loan at the end of the nominated period. The total loan term cannot exceed 15 years.

For an LRBA in existence on publication of these guidelines, the trustees may adopt the rate of 5.75% as their fixed rate provided that the total period for which the interest rate is fixed does not exceed 5 years. The interest rate must convert to a variable interest rate loan at the end of the nominated period. The total loan term cannot exceed 15 years.

Variable interest rate loans:Original loan – 7 year maximum loan term.Re-financing – maximum loan term is 7 years less the duration(s) of any previous loan(s) in respect of the collection of assets.Fixed interest rate loan:

Rate may be fixed up to for a maximum period of 3 years and must convert to a variable interest rate loan at the end of the nominated period. The total loan term cannot exceed 7 years.

For an LRBA in existence on publication of these guidelines, the trustees may adopt the rate of 7.75% as their fixed rate provided that the total period for which the interest rate is fixed does not exceed 3 years. The interest rate must convert to a variable interest rate loan at the end of the nominated period. The total loan cannot exceed 7 years.

Loan-Value –RatioLVRMaximum 70% LVR for both commercial & residential property.
Total LVR of 70% if more than one loan.
Maximum 50% LVR.Total LVR of 50% if more than one loan.
SecurityA registered mortgage over the property.A registered charge/mortgage or similar security (that provides security for loans for such assets).
Personal GuaranteeNot requiredNot required
Nature & frequency of repaymentsEach repayment is to be both principal and interest.Repayments to be made monthly.Each repayment is to be both principal and interest.Repayments to be made monthly.
Loan AgreementA written and executed loan agreement is required.A written and executed loan agreement is required.
Information sourced from Practical Compliance Guidelines PCG 2016/5.

Potential Trap to be aware of: Importantly, as part of this announcement, the ATO also indicated that the amount of principal and interest payments actually made with respect to a borrowing under an LRBA for the year ended 30 June 2016 must be in accordance with terms that are consistent with an arm’s length dealing.Information sourced from Practical Compliance Guidelines PCG 2016/5.

Where to find the Indicator Rate in future year:

The PGS referred to: Reserve Bank of Australia Indicator Lending Rates for banks providing standard variable housing loans for investors. Applicable rates:

  • For the 2015-16 year, the rate is 5.75%
  • For the 2016-17 year the rate is 5.65%
  • For the 2017-18 and 2018-19 years the rate is 5.8%
  • For the 2019-20 year the rate is 5.94%
  • For the 2020-21 year the rate is 5.1%
  • For the 2021-22 year the rate is 5.1%
  • For the 2022-23 year the rate is 5.35%
  • For the 2023-24 year the rate is 8.85%
  • For the 2024-25 year the rate is 9.35% until 30 June 2025
  • For the 2025-26 year the rate is 8.95%

For 2019-20 and later years, the rate published for May (the rate for the month of May immediately prior to the start of the relevant financial year)

It is the applicable rate under Column H of the above spreadsheet (click on link). The rate seems to have started in August 2015 but I assume we must use the May rate from now on.

In referencing the Indicator Rate you can use:
Ref: Title: Lending rates; Housing loans; Banks; Variable; Standard; Investor
Lending rates; Housing loans; Banks; Variable; Standard; Investor
Frequency: Monthly
Units: Per cent per annum
Source RBA
Publication Date 04-Apr-2016
Series ID: FILRHLBVSI

Example – Real Property taken from Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2016/5 Example 1

A complying SMSF borrowed money under an LRBA, using the funds to acquire commercial property valued at $500,000 on 1 July 2011.

  1. The borrower is the SMSF trustee.
  2. The lender is an SMSF member’s father (a related party).
  3. A holding trust has been established, and the holding trust trustee is the legal owner of the property until the borrowing is repaid.

The loan has the following features:

  1. the total amount borrowed is $500,000
  2. the SMSF met all the costs associated with purchasing the property from existing fund assets.
  3. the loan is interest free
  4. the principal is repayable at the end of the term of the loan, but may be repaid earlier if the SMSF chooses to do so
  5. the term of the loan is 25 years
  6. the lender’s recourse against the SMSF is limited to the rights relating to the property held in the holding trust, and
  7. the loan agreement is in writing.

We do not consider that this LRBA has been established or maintained on arm’s length terms. The income earned from the property, which is rented to an unrelated party, may give rise to NALI.

At 1 July 2015, the property was valued at $643,000, and the SMSF has not repaid any of the principal since the loan commenced.

If after considering TD 2016/16, it is determined that the income earned from the property is in fact NALI, to avoid having to report NALI for the 2015-16 year (and prior years) the Fund has a number of options.

Option 1 – Alter the terms of the loan to meet guidelines

The SMSF and the lender could alter the terms of the loan arrangement to meet Safe Harbour 1 (for real property).

To bring the terms of the loan into line with this Safe Harbour, the trustees of the SMSF must ensure that:

  1. The 70% LVR is met (in this case, the value of the property at 1 July 2015 may be used).

Based on a property valuation of $643,000 at 1 July 2015, the maximum the SMSF can borrow is $450,100. The SMSF needs to repay $49,900 of principal as soon as practical before 30 June 2016.

  1. The loan term cannot exceed 11 years from 1 July 2015.

The SMSF must recognise that the loan commenced 4 years earlier. An additional 11 years would not exceed the maximum 15 year term.

  1. The SMSF can use a variable interest rate. Alternatively, it can alter the terms of the loan to use a fixed rate of interest for a period that ensures the total period for which the rate of interest is fixed does not exceed 5 years. The loan must convert to a variable interest rate loan at the end of the nominated period.

The interest rate of 5.75% applies for 2015-16 and 5.65% p.a. applies from 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017. The SMSF trustee must determine and pay the appropriate amount of principal and interest payable for the year. This calculation must take the opening balance of $500,000, the remaining term of 11 years, and the timing of the capital repayment, into account.

  1. After 1 July 2016, the new LRBA must continue under terms complying with the ATO’s guidelines relating to real property at all times.

For example, the SMSF must ensure that it updates the interest rate used for the loan on 1 July each year (if variable) or as appropriate (if fixed), and make monthly principal and interest repayments accordingly.

Option 2 – Refinance through a commercial lender

The fund could refinance the LRBA with a commercial lender, extinguish the original arrangement and pay the associated costs.

For any period after 1 July 2015 that the original loan remains in place, the SMSF must ensure that the terms of the loan are consistent with an arm’s length dealing, and relevant amounts of principal and interest are paid to the original lender.

The SMSF may choose to apply the terms set out under Safe Harbour 1 to calculate the amounts of principal and interest to be paid to the original lender for the relevant part of the 2015-16 year.

Option 3 – Payout the LRBA

The SMSF may decide to repay the loan to the related party, and bring the LRBA to an end before 30 January 2017.

For any period after 1 July 2015 that the original loan remains in place, the SMSF must ensure that the terms of the loan are consistent with an arm’s length dealing, and the relevant amounts of principal and interest are paid to the original lender.

The SMSF may choose to apply the terms set out under Safe Harbour 1 to calculate the amounts of principal and interest to be paid to the original lender for the relevant period.

Each option will have many advantages and disadvantages – so it is important to understand what the practical implications of each option are, and how physically you will approach each option. Seek specialised advice on this matter as it is not a strategy suitable for DIY implementation

Important Note to 13.22C or Unrelated Unit Trust Investors

The guidelines provided in this PCG are not applicable to an SMSF LRBA involving an investment in an unlisted company or unit trust (e.g. where a related party LRBA has been entered into to acquire a collection of units in an unrelated private trust or a 13.22C compliant trust). As such, trustees who have entered into such an arrangement will have no option but to benchmark their particular loan arrangement based on commercial loan terms, or to bring the LRBA to an end.

Please visit out SMSF Property page to get details on all available strategies for SMSF property investors.

UPDATE (Relief for those caught by Budget measures)

In a letter to an industry association, the Treasurer, Scott Morrison, has outlined transitional arrangements to allow additional non-concessional contributions above the proposed lifetime limit in certain limited circumstances. Contributions made in the following circumstances may be permitted without causing a breach of the lifetime cap:

  • where the trustees of a self managed superannuation fund (SMSF) have entered into a contract to purchase an asset prior to 3 May 2016 that completes after this date and non-concessional contributions were planned to be made to complete the contract of sale. Non-concessional contributions will be permitted only to allow the contract to complete provided they are within the relevant non-concessional cap that was applicable prior to Budget night, and
  • where additional contributions are made in order to comply with the Australian Taxation Office’s (ATO) Practical Compliance Guideline (PCG) 2016/5 related to limited recourse borrowing arrangements, provided they are made prior to 31 January 2017.

Additional non-concessional contributions made under these proposed transitional arrangements will count towards the lifetime cap, but will not result in an excess.

I hope this guidance has been helpful and please take the time to comment. Feedback always appreciated. Please reblog, retweet, like on Facebook etc to make sure we get the news out there. As always please contact me if you want to look at your own options. We have offices in Castle Hill and Windsor but can meet clients anywhere in Sydney or via Skype. Click here for appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus FSSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

 

     

Tel: 02 9899 3693, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002, Norwest NSW 2153

U40, 8 Victoria Ave., Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.

Understanding Currency Exposure When Investing Overseas in your SMSF


Investing-Globally

Recent swings in global currencies have brought exchange-rate risk back to the forefront for investors with overseas exposure in different currencies. Currency risks are risks that arise from changes in the relative valuation of different currencies. These changes can create unpredictable gains and losses when the profits or dividends from an investment are converted from a foreign currency back into Australian dollars.

Any investor who holds stocks, ETFs with the likes of iShares, Vanguard or SPDR or managed funds such as  Magellan Global Fund in their SMSF portfolio that invest outside Australia will have some exposure to foreign currency, and where the Aussie dollar exchange rate goes will have an effect on these SMSF portfolios. For instance, a strengthening dollar could negatively impact foreign stock market returns and you should consider this risk in portfolio design.

Interest rates are critical, because when a country’s rate rises, in many cases, so does its currency. Or in our case if the US interest rate rises or at the moment is being held unexpectedly lower by the Us Federal Reserve, our currency’s exchange rate can fluctuate wildly in response to another government’s actions.

Up until recently, this wasn’t much of a worry for Australian investors. Rates were low, the Aussie dollar was getting weaker coming down fro its peak near $1.10 to the US$, and people made money by investing in foreign assets.

Going forward that may not be so easy so its is important for Self Managed Super Fund investors to understand currency exchange risk.

Here is a good video from Blackrock iShares explaining how currency exposure affects returns on international investments.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=487RAkszHyY

Now you should note you can also find Currency Hedged ETFs and Hedged Managed funds (as opposed to a Hedge Fund which is totally different) that can help you easily manage the effect of currency on your investments and can be paired with their unhedged counterparts to tailor currency risk while maintaining consistent equity exposure. Of course there is a cost to implementing this protection but that is what good portfolio risk management is all about.

Do you want some more education on why you should consider international investments as part of your SMSF portfolio? then please check out this previous blog about investing internationally via your SMSF.

Are you looking for an advisor that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? Then why now contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

SMSF Specialist Adviser 

 Follow SMSFCoach on Twitter Liam Shorte on Linkedin NextGen Wealth on Facebook   

Verante Financial Planning

Tel: 02 98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.

SMSF Jargon busting – Who are the related parties of an SMSF?


"Related Parties"

So you have a great idea to move some assets to your SMSF but you want to stay within the rules and keep your fund compliant. Then you hit the jargon associated with Superannuation rules and regulations.

You need to understand who are “related parties” of your SMSF for two reasons, to ensure compliance with the acquisition from a related party rules and to determine the in-house assets.

A related party is defined in the Superannuation Industry Supervision) Act 1993 known as the SIS Act. This is the bible when it comes to Superannuation so you should save that link above. Anyway in the SIS Act sec 10(1) a related party is defined as:

  • Fund member
  • Standard employer-sponsor of the fund or
  • Part 8 associate of a fund member or a part 8 associate of a standard employer-sponsor of the fund.

Ok the first one is easy. Any member including you yourself is a related party.

Standard Employer

A standard employer sponsor of a fund is an employer who contributes to the fund due to an agreement between the employer and the trustee of the fund. These were common in the early days of SMSFs but largely non-existent now.

Where an employer only contributes to a fund due to an agreement between the member and the employer such as under a salary sacrifice arrangement, they will not be considered a standard employer sponsor.

If an SMSF has a standard employer sponsor, which would be uncommon, the relationship will be noted either in the trust deed or in an attached schedule to the deed.

Part 8 associate

Now prepare for a headache to hit you hard after reading this one.

Part 8 associates are broken down in the legislation to Part 8 associates of individuals, companies and partnerships. However, if there is no standard employer sponsor, we only need to examine the part 8 associates of the members who will always be individuals.

The part 8 associates of a member are:

  1. a relative of the member (parent, grandparent, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, linear descendant or adopted child of the member or their spouse or a spouse of the aforementioned)
  2. other members of the SMSF (a person who is not a member but acting as individual trustee or director under an Enduring Power of Attorney is not necessarily a Part 8 associate)
  3. a partner of the member (legal partnership, not ‘business partners’ i.e. company directors) and their spouses and children
  4. the trustee of a trust the member controls and
  5. a company sufficiently influenced by, or in which majority voting interest is held by the member and their Part 8 associates either individually or together.

A member of the fund will be deemed to control a trust where the member and/or their part 8 associates are:

  • entitled to a fixed entitlement of more than 50 per cent of the capital of the trust,
  • entitled to a fixed entitlement of more than 50 per cent of the income of the trust,
  • able or accustomed (formally or informally) to direct the trustees to act in accordance with their directions or
  • able to appoint or remove trustees.

A company will be deemed to be controlled by a member where the directors are accustomed or under an obligation to act under the instructions of the member and/ or their Part 8 associates or the member and/ or their part 8 associates have more than 50 per cent of the voting rights.

OK, so I warned you to beware of the headache inducing nature of dealing with “Part 8 Associates”. Was I right or was I RIGHT!

The best advice I can give you is to get advice before transferring assets and ask for the advice and get that advice in writing so all parties are sure of the scenario and no mistakes are made.

Are you looking for an adviser that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? Then why now contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

SMSF Specialist Adviser 

 Follow SMSFCoach on Twitter Liam Shorte on Linkedin NextGen Wealth on Facebook   

Verante Financial Planning

Tel: 02 98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.

Herd Mentality and Bubbles – Be Careful When Following the Crowd


Whether you are a long-term investor or an opportunist, many investors find comfort in knowing that many others are investing the same way they are and they get caught up in the media hype on a certain sector. Think of the Dot Com craze in the late 90’s when many invested in this sector even though they did not understand it well and as prices rose even the hesitant among investors poured more money in for fear of missing out or FOMO as I prefer to term it. A good adviser should help you identify the risk of these fads and keep you well diversified.

Here is a good educational video from Franklin Templeton Investments on the subject.

I believe that you always need to do your own research on an investment and then cross check that with others. Be prepared to listen to those who may seem wacky, over optimistic or pessimistic before making your decisions. A good Self Managed Super Fund advisor should be able to get you a selection of research from different sources to stress test any investment.

Bubble’s go back a long time, even centuries and while we are weary of each investment that crashes we rarely learn enough to avoid the next one. From my personal collection is one of my favourite prints called Gekko’s Tulip Mania which you may have seen in the movie Wall Street 2. I have it hanging on my office wall as a constant reminder! You can read more on this bubble at Wikipedia – Tulip Mania

 “This is the greatest bubble story of all time… they call it the Tulip Mania.” - Gordon Gekko

“This is the greatest bubble story of all time… they call it the Tulip Mania.”
– Gordon Gekko

For those looking for a truly Australian history of bubbles I would recommend reading a 2003 paper by the John Simon and published by the RBA available free online called Three Australian Asset-price Bubbles

Are you looking for an advisor that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? then why now contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

SMSF Specialist Adviser 

 Follow SMSFCoach on Twitter Liam Shorte on Linkedin NextGen Wealth on Facebook   

Verante Financial Planning

Tel: 02 98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.

Benefits Of Transferring A Business Property In To Your SMSF – Superannuation Strategy


Years after the 2008 financial crisis and some people have been slow to regain confidence in the share markets and low cash and term deposit interest rates leave them cold. A growing number of people have considered shifting their superannuation to the more self- directed option of a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF). Business Real Property

Small to Medium Business owners have always been at the forefront of adopting SMSFs and they have been particularly interested in this rapidly growing area for greater control of their superannuation savings and the flexibility of investments allowed in a SMSF structure. However the ability to either transfer their business premises into their SMSF via a contribution or sale, depending on their cash flow circumstances, has been attractive to many business owners.

Current legislation governing SMSFs, the SIS Act, allows a SMSF to acquire only three types of assets from the members or a related party. These assets are business real property, widely held managed funds and listed securities (shares).

Business real property is best defined as “any freehold or leasehold interest of the entity in real property where the real property is used wholly and exclusively in one or more businesses (whether carried on by the business or not).” This definition does not allow much leeway so you should seek professional advice to ensure that your property satisfies the requirements of the “wholly and exclusively” business use test and meets the definition of business real property prior to implementing this strategy

Benefits:

  1. Release equity to build the business – you can access superannuation funds to help fund business growth prior to retirement by way of a cash purchase by the SMSF.
  2. Tax minimisation – the property moves in to the concessionally taxed superannuation environment; 15% tax rate while members are in accumulation phase or exempt from tax when members are in pension phase.,
  3. Asset Protection – to protect the value of the business real property in the event of bankruptcy, litigation or changes to your industry destroying your market.
  4. Build funds for retirement – you have a bricks and mortar investment to boost your retirement funds earning market rent at concessional rates with the ability to avoid any CGT if sold later.
  5. If you are seeking new premises then buying in your super fund allows you the security of tenure that comes with being your own landlord.
  6. Helps in preparing a business for transfer or sale. If the new owner or family members cannot afford to buy the business and the property, you can sell the business premises and lease them the property.

Risks:

  1. You should always ensure the strategy meets the Sole Purpose test of providing for your retirement. It should stack up as a stand-alone investment in  its own right.
  2. If your business should fail and you can no longer lease the premises the you are hit with a double whammy with no income in your personal name and possibly an asset that is hard to lease to a new third-party
  3. While it may be a sound investment now, things may change and your company may outgrow the premises leaving you again with a commercial property that may be hard to sell to extract equity for your next move.
  4. Commercial, retail and industrial property is often a good income orientated investment with income well above that available from residential property but rarely sees the same degree of capital growth. You need to be aware of the trade-off and a diversified portfolio should be considered.
  5. Once you are in pension phase you will need to fund pensions so you need to ensure liquidity in the fund. This is fine while rented or you can make contributions but remember if not working after age 65 you cannot make further contributions to help with liquidity.

Transfers of business real property purchased from related parties must be transferred at current market value as if the transaction was to occur on an arm’s length basis. This requirement allows for very little manipulation of the market value and heavy penalties could apply if any transfer value didn’t stand up to audit and ATO scrutiny.

So you have three or more options when it comes to the strategy. Your SMSF can buy the property utilising cash currently within the SMSF as a normal purchase. If your fund does not have enough cash then you can look at using a Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangement to borrow the shortfall. More details on that strategy can be found here.

Alternatively, you can structure the deal as an in-specie transfer (a contribution of an asset, in this case property, instead of cash). You are still subject to member contribution caps but we have moved properties worth up to $500,000 in for couples and $1,000,000 where the SMSF had 4 members using a combination of concessional contributions limits and the 3-year bring forward rule on non-concessional limits.

You may also be able to use the Small Business CGT concessions in conjunction with a short term LRBA to move a property of up to $1.445,000 in to the fund with careful planning.

The whole deal has been sweetened by the fact that a number of the State Revenue Offices including NSW OSR have allowed concessional stamp duty stamp ($500) on in-specie property transfers whereby no cash has changed hands. This stamp duty saving can make transferring the business premises into a SMSF much more attractive. It should be noted that stamp duty is a state tax with no uniformity between states. Please seek legal advice always when dealing with stamp duty on property transfers and tax advice when moving assets between entities.

Remember the core philosophy behind Superannuation is that they must adhere to the Sole Purpose Test. While a strategy may help your business currently, its primary goal should be to provide for your retirement so the investment should always stand up as a viable investment regardless of your internal lease arrangements.
Check out the most common mistakes people make when dealing with property, borrowing and a SMSF here:

Property through super in a SMSF – Part 3: 20 most common mistakes

SMSF Borrowing: What Can I Do With An Investment Property Within The Rules.

Stamp Duty on Transfers of Property to an SMSF as at 01 Jan 2015

 

Keep updated by putting an email address in on the left hand column and pressing the “Sign me up!” button. 

Are you looking for an advisor that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? then why now contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Bye for now.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

SMSF Specialist Adviser 

 Follow SMSFCoach on Twitter Liam Shorte on Linkedin NextGen Wealth on Facebook   

Tel: 02 9899 3693 , Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002, Norwest NSW 2153

40/8 Victoria Ave. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of  Viridian Advisory Pty Ltd (ABN 34 605 438 042) (AFSL 476223)

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.

Landlords Insurance – a must for your SMSF Property


I trained in General Insurance in the UK after my Graduation and much of that time was in the complaints, claims and product design departments. So I know how things go wrong when people take out unsuitable policies or under-insure their properties. 24 years later and  nothing has changed, so I have been recommending people use a General Insurance Broker if they are inexperienced,  lack confidence or want help and advice about insuring their business, liability or property assets.

That brings me to the title of this blog and I asked my preferred Insurance Broker here in the Hills District of Sydney, who operates countrywide, to explain the insurance requirements for an SMSF buying property

Don’t skimp on your insurances because when the time comes and you have a claim, you won’t be congratulating yourself on how much money you saved on your insurance premiums.

If you have purchased property in your SMSF it is important for you to take the correct steps to insure your investment.

If you borrow against the assets in your SMSF the mortgagor will require you to have adequate cover for the asset and for the Liability obligations of the SMSF. If the assets of the fund cover the purchase in full however you are still required as Trustee of the fund to correctly insure the funds interests. The fund is not permitted to “self-insure” any assets or property. The ATO has strict guidelines regarding the duties and obligations of SMSF trustees so it is important to get your insurance program right.

The question arises: who takes out the property insurance and landlord’s protection insurance, the SMSF Trustee or the Holding Trustee? I refer to this content from Towsends Law on the matter

SMSF Trustee
The SMSF Trustee is entitled to take out insurances for the property as the Fund is liable under the loan and is also absolutely entitled to the benefit of the Property. 

As the Fund is ultimately the party that is detrimentally affected should anything happen to the Property, the SMSF Trustee should ensure that the Fund is able to claim for any damage that might occur.

Holding Trustee
The Holding Trustee is the legal owner of the land and is entitled to insure the property against damage, and likewise for landlord insurance.  Some lenders may also insist that the registered proprietor of the property holds an insurance policy for the property.

But it is important to keep in mind the nature of the arrangement between the SMSF Trustee and Holding Trustee should insurance be taken out by the Holding Trustee.  

As the Holding Trustee is a bare trustee it must make sure that it does not take any action unless it is directed to do so by the Fund Trustee, who is absolutely entitled to the Property.  This direction by the Fund Trustee should be done formally and in writing and confirmed by the Holding Trustee executing minutes to confirm this action.
 
Final Decision
The final answer is that both the Holding Trustee and the SMSF Trustee have an insurable interest in the land and that both are eligible to be the owner of the property insurance and landlord’s protection insurance over the property.  

In both instances all amounts payable in respect of the insurance should be paid by the Fund Trustee. Obviously the Holding Trustee must hold any policy proceeds on trust for the SMSF.

From a purely administrative position it would be easier for the SMSF to hold the insurances to avoid the constant but mandatory interplay between the SMSF and its bare trustee the Holding Trustee.  But the insurance company may have its own requirements as might the Fund’s Lender.

So our preference is to have all insurances for the SMSF in the name of the fund. You cannot have personal items or assets listed on a policy in your funds name, and likewise you cannot have your fund’s assets listed on a personal policy for some of your personal assets.

As with all insurances, you really do get what you pay for. The more optional extras you include in your policy the more protection you will have. Let’s go through a fairly standard Landlords Insurance policy and give some simple definitions of each section. Like your personal household insurance policy your landlord’s policy will have cover for both your Building and for your Contents. These are fairly standard; however it is important to read the definitions to determine which items come under which section of cover. You may be in for a surprise if you haven’t studied the wording properly.

Where a Landlords Insurance policy differs in comparison to your standard household insurance is in the additional covers offered.

  • Loss of Rent – This is to cover your lost income if you have a claim under your building and contents cover, and the property becomes uninhabitable as a result.
  • Strata Title Mortgagee’s Protection – This covers the mortgagee named in the Schedule as if they were “You” on the same terms as Section1 against physical loss or physical damage caused by any of the Defined Events (it does not include the Additional Benefits).
  • Deliberate Damage and/or Theft by Tenants – Cover for physical damage arising from deliberate, intentional or malicious acts and acts of theft to the Building or Contents by the Tenant.
  • Tenant Default – This cover if for loss of rent, payable by the Tenant, which arises from damage covered under the Deliberate Damage/Theft by Tenant section above or from breach of a written Lease agreement.

Chances are you’ve worked hard at acquiring your assets and building your Super for your retirement. Don’t skimp on your insurances because when the time comes and you have a claim, you won’t be congratulating yourself on how much money you saved on your insurance premiums. Instead you will be hoping your insurance policy will respond to your claim.

If you’re at all unsure on what you need, talk to an Insurance Broker. If you don’t know an insurance broker, then speak to the people you trust with your Investments and your accounts because they should be able to put you in touch with an Insurance broker they trust.

For more information please don’t hesitate to contact me.

The SMSF Coach or Verante Financial Planning do not request or receive any commissions or referral fees from recommending services from Insurance brokers, we just want the best professional advice for our clients.

For more detail on Investing in Property through an SMSF check out our previous articles

Property through super in a SMSF – Part 1: Background

Property through super in a SMSF – Part 2: The Process

Property through super in a SMSF – Part 3: 20 most common mistakes

SMSF Borrowing: What Can I Do With An Investment Property Within The Rules.

Can I borrow to buy a house and land package off the plan in my SMSF?

Keep updated by putting an email address in on the left hand column and pressing the “Sign me up!” button. Happy to take comments in the section below.

Bye for now.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

SMSF Specialist Adviser 

 Follow SMSFCoach on Twitter Liam Shorte on Linkedin NextGen Wealth on Facebook   

Verante Financial Planning

Tel: 02 98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.

Using an Anti-Detriment Payment vs. Recontribution Strategy in your SMSF


I have used the anti-detriment payment strategy to improve death benefit payments over the years but they are dwarfed by the number of SMSFs using recontribution strategies.

Anti-Detriment vs. Recontribution

No clear winner

With the implementation of the Simple Super legislation in July 2007, many strategies have been published regarding re-contributing into your superannuation fund with the benefit of avoiding the 17% tax on death benefits to non-dependants. However this may not always be beneficial as paying no tax may result in no anti-detriment payment being received which is an additional / alternative strategy available.

The recontribution strategy involves a member of a superannuation fund, normally after age 60 or if fully retired after age 55, withdrawing a lump-sum, and then recontributing the amount back into the fund as a non-concessional contribution. The result of this process increases a member’s tax free component of their benefit and reduces the taxable portion.

The advantages of this include:

  • Members under age 60 become eligible for an increased tax-free portion on their pension;
  • Non-tax dependent beneficiaries of a deceased member’s account pay no tax on the tax-free portion but 16.5% on the balance.

There are also considerations that must be taken into account before implementing such a strategy, such as:

  • by withdrawing lump sum benefits from super below the age of 60, you will only be able to receive the first $185,000 of your taxable portion at a concessional tax rate;
  • Your ability to recontribute is restricted. For the current financial year, you may contribute up to an annual cap of $180,000. For members under 65, they may contribute up to $540,000 in a financial year by using the “3 year bring forward” rule.

An anti-detriment payment is effectively a refund of contributions tax paid by a member during the accumulation phase. It is an additional payment that may be made to an eligible dependant if a death benefit is taken as a lump sum. The anti-detriment payment is calculated based on the taxable portion of a deceased members balance so a reduction in the taxable component through a recontribution strategy will effectively reduce any anti-detriment payment available. The effect of either strategy can be seen below.

Consider the following example:

 Member with $600,000 in their account all from SG Contributions and Salary Sacrifice i.e. no Tax Free component – 100% Taxable Component. He has a son and daughter who each earn about $90,000 per annum.

 In this case not only has the deceased member’s dependant received an additional $105,882, the relevant Fund will be able to apply $705,880 in deductions against its income going forward. Where, for example, the deceased’s adult son and daughter choose to become members of the SMSF and, on average, the SMSF earns $40,000 a year in investment income, a deduction of this size could shield the Fund from tax (on concessional contributions and investment income) for over 8 years!

Anti-Detriment

Without Anti-Detriment

Tax Free Component Nil Tax Free Component Nil
Lump sum death benefit $600,000 Lump sum death benefit $600,000

Anti-detriment payment

$105,882 Anti-detriment payment Nil
Total death benefit $705,880 Total death benefit $600,000
Tax deductions going forward ($105,882/15%) $705,880 Tax deductions going forward Nil

The following table looks at the effect of implementing a re-contribution strategy on death benefits paid to a non-dependant for tax purposes (such as adult children) and a dependant (spouse) compared to an anti-detriment payment is as follows:

Strategy 1: No Recontribution Strategy (lump sum paid to adult child)

Strategy 2: No Recontribution Strategy (lump sum paid to spouse)

Strategy 3 Full Recontribution Strategy used

  Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3
Taxable Component $600,000 $600,000 Nil
Tax-free component Nil Nil $600,000
Anti-detriment payment $105,882 $105,882  
Total benefit (pre-tax) $705,882 $705,882 $600,000
Tax payable by non-dependant $116,471 Nil Nil
Total benefit (after-tax) $589,411 $705,882 $600,000

Generally, the recontribution strategy is worth considering if the benefit is likely to be paid to a non-dependent for tax purposes, such as an adult child unless they will make use of the SMSF for their own future superannuation strategy. This is because the tax savings generally outweigh any potential anti-detriment payment they would otherwise receive.

For a spouse or dependant child, you will usually be better off relying on the anti-detriment provisions – because they pay no tax on death benefits. However this requires prior planning and willingness to pay additional administration costs and taxes on anti-detriment reserve even when you reach pension age.

Where the anti-detriment payment tax deduction causes a tax loss in the fund, the full quantum of the loss may not give a benefit to remaining members. In circumstances where for example the spouse is in pension phase, it is important to recognise that “Exempt Current Pension Income” absorbs carry forward losses (other than carry forward capital losses) before it is available to offset income of the Fund. Also, an anti-detriment reserve can affect the calculation of exempt pension income in the fund. Therefore, the full benefit of the anti-detriment may not be able to be utilized.

An alternative solution for those looking to use an Anti-detriment strategy and with a terminal illness or shorter expected life expectancy is to roll-over the member’s account to a retail or industry superannuation account provider that have a policy of making anti-detriment payments as their set up means they will have more flexibility to fund anti-detriment payments.

Another alternative for those dealing with a death of someone well before retirement age is the use of a Future Service Benefits Deduction so click on the link to read more about that.

If you believe that setting up a recontribution and/or an anti-detriment strategy could be beneficial to your superannuation fund and to the your beneficiaries, then now is the time to plan for this and put in place the appropriate structures and strategies. Contact me at our Windsor or Castle Hill offices or by phone or email if you would like to discuss your options.

Keep updated by putting an email address in on the left hand column and pressing the “Sign me up!” button. Happy to take comments or questions in the section below.

Bye for now.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

SMSF Specialist Adviser 

 Follow SMSFCoach on Twitter Liam Shorte on Linkedin NextGen Wealth on Facebook   

Verante Financial Planning

Tel: 02 98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.

Using your SMSF to plan now for a future downsize and a seachange


Living in Sydney and I have many clients who dream of retiring up or down the coast or inland to more suitable and often slower paced areas of Australia.  SMSF Property Investment

Many plan to downsize and sell their Sydney home in retirement and purchase a place on the coast. The issue that arises is that they often feel they have identified the area or actual property they want to live in during retirement and want to secure it now. Others are afraid that the selected area will be priced out of their budget in future years with so many baby boomers retiring over the coming decades.

So here is a solution we used for a few of our clients wanting to plan ahead and reduce that risk.

Jeff & Joan (of course it’s not their real names!) came to see me in 2006 and they had a lovely house in Hills District of Sydney but it was 2 storeys and with Jeff’s knees playing up they knew that they would need a single level property later. Also they planned to move to Lake Macquarie in 10 years to be nearer their children and hopefully future grandchildren in Newcastle in retirement.

They could not borrow to buy a property in their own names as they had business and family commitments that reduced their borrowing capacity.

They had a decent sized SMSF and could afford to buy a property as part of their diversified strategy so we put this strategy to them.

Sole Purpose Test issues

Due to the issues with the sole purpose test we convinced them that rather than looking for a specific property in the range of $750,000 they might use themselves but stretch their budget, they should identify a suitable investment property with good rental and capital growth prospects to deliver the best possible return for their retirement. Our argument was that the debt burden would be too high and their personal circumstances and needs can change but a good investment property could deliver the result they need to fund a better retirement regardless of those changing circumstances.

They identified a good investment property in Lake Macquarie that ticked all the boxes including affordability and was currently tenanted. We revised the SMSF Investment strategy and put the trustees reasoning for investing in residential property and the projected returns and maintained a diversified investment portfolio with the other funds. We also looked at options and exit strategies as part of the analysis and the investment stood up as a sound one for their portfolio.

There SMSF purchased the property in early 2007 for $400,000 and it was a sound investment over the following 5 years providing a reasonable rental income and about 3% capital growth per year over that time which was decent for a single level property just one street back from the water.

In 2012 Jeff decided to retire early and Joan agreed to reduce her hours. They put their house in Castle Hill on the market on reviving their needs thy believe it would be prudent not spend too much for their dream home and settle for the current investment property. gave the Lake Macquarie Tenants 4 months notice which they felt was fair. Their Sydney property sold a few months later for $850,000.

We got a professional valuation on the Lake Macquarie property and it was valued between $480,000-$500,000, so we agreed a market value of $490,000. The couple elected for a lump sum pension commutation from their SMSF paid “in-specie” as the Lake Macquarie property from their Self Managed Super fund and because it was in NSW they did have to pay Stamp Duty on the transfer. I believe on Victoria and WA there  are exemptions that apply on such transfers as long as it is the same Beneficial Owners after the transaction. We sought legal advice here in NSW and were unable to get this concession.

The couple then used $150,000 to renovate the property and kept $150,000 in Term Deposits in their own name. This left approximately $500,000 which they contributed as Non-Concessional contributions equally to the SMSF.

What were the benefits?

  1. If they had stretched to the mor expensive property they would gave had to take on debt and could not have considered the early retirement.
  2. Secured a foothold in the property market in their area of choice for future retirement.  The relief of having some certainty should not be underestimated by advisers.
  3. They did not over extend their personal debt which would have left them very exposed during a downturn in their business from 2008-2010
  4. Rental income from 2007 to 2012 was taxed at only 15% rather than their higher marginal rates.
  5. Secured a $90,000 tax-free gain on the investment property as they were in pension phase.
  6. Turned their superannuation accounts from mostly a Taxable component to accounts with more than $250,000 each of non-concessional components and Tax Free to their adult children as part of their Estate Planning.
  7. Oh and they missed the GFC effect on this portion of their investments!

Downside:

  1. Yes we had to pay Stamp duty but that was highlighted from the start as a possibility
  2. The house prices did not run away from them in Lake Macquarie but at least they were not worried.

I must also mention a comment the clients made in their latest review and that was that in the 12 months since they moved they realise a waterfront property comes with higher rates and maintenance costs that would not have suited their retirement budget so well. Oh and they now have 2 grandchildren that they look after 2 days per week while enjoying the Lake Macquarie lifestyle they wanted.

Why not checkout my article “ What can my SMSF invest in?” as a good place to start.

As always please contact me if you want to look at your own options. We have offices in Castle Hill and Windsor but can meet clients anywhere in Sydney or online via Skype.

Keep updated by putting an email address in on the left hand column and pressing the “Sign me up!” button. Happy to take comments in the section below.

Bye for now.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

SMSF Specialist Adviser 

 Follow SMSFCoach on Twitter Liam Shorte on Linkedin NextGen Wealth on Facebook   

Verante Financial Planning

Tel: 02 98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.