Superannuation — tax certainty for deceased estates – Government MYEFO announcement good for SMSFs


The release of draft taxation ruling TR 2011/D3 in July last year caused much concern when it suggested that the pension exemption ceases automatically upon death (unless a reversionary pension was in place).

Under those proposed rules if an SMSF member died with assets carrying unrealised Capital Gains, even if the deceased were receiving a pension, upon death the pension would cease (unless the pension qualified as an auto-reversionary pension). If SMSF assets were then sold/transferred, the SMSF would have CGT implications.  (more…)

Is your SMSF lending money to someone?


Is that loan in your SMSF’s best interest?

The Tax Office issued an information sheet on their website last November warning trustees about the perils of lending an SMSF’s funds to the wrong person. This includes your own business, someone who advises you or a family member or friend.

An all too common occurrence is the practice adopted by some people of withdrawing funds from their SMSF to “temporarily” help keep their business afloat when cash flow is tight.

Has your SMSF loaned money? If so, you need to make sure the loan terms comply with the law and are in the best interests of your funds sole purpose test which is to provide for your retirement.

The boys and girls at the ATO are rightly concerned some trustees are lending money from their fund to people who provide advice or assist in the running of the fund. This may not be in the best interest of your SMSF, and may place your retirement savings at risk. If someone is recommending you set up a SMSF and then to lend them or a related party money for a development, you have to ask yourself in who’s best interest are they working? Might be time to scrutinise the minute details of this “too good to be true one time only opportunity”.

So when would a loan agreement not be seen to be in the best interest of your SMSF ? Basically, when you have given discount loan rates or favourable terms – this could have serious consequences. Here is one example they give:

 when you have given discount loan rates or favourable terms – this could have serious consequences. In addition to putting your member’s benefits at risk, your SMSF could be found to be non-complying and would, therefore, not qualify for concessional tax rates.

They advise that before lending any money, you should consider your fund’s investment strategy and determine whether the investment is appropriate and, in particular, whether lending money to people providing you with services or advice is in the best long-term interests of your SMSF.

If you are not sure about making these types of investments choices, they recommend that you seek advice before entering into such arrangements.

If you still decide to go ahead and lend money from your SMSF, the ATO advise that “you should:

  • write an appropriate loan agreement and have it signed by all the parties involved
  • ensure the loan agreement specifies all the terms of the loan, such as:
    • what the security for the loan
    • what is the repayment period
    • when repayments will be paid
    • the amount of the repayments
    • the interest rate
  • ensure the interest and repayments are received by the fund according to the loan agreement
  • take appropriate action to protect the fund’s investment if the loan agreement is not followed
  • ensure the loan is sensible and does not put the members’ benefits at risk
  • ensure that the conditions of the loan agreement do not provide the borrower with favourable terms.

Remember that you are the one ultimately responsible for running your SMSF, and you must make sure you understand your duties, responsibilities and obligations.”

With regards to taking funds out to help your business, you need to firstly know that should the business go under that your Superannuation is in most cases protected in bankruptcy from creditors so you should be careful about accessing this protected asset.

Regardless of how much you trust a person even if they are your accountant, lawyer, financial planner, mortgage broker or best mate, you need to get independent third-party advice. Don’t be embarrassed about not completely trusting the promoters scheme as it is often too late later to get your funds back and hindsight is a cruel tormentor when facing loved ones having lost your retirement nest egg.

For further information on the issues raised in this blog please contact our Castle Hill SMSF Centre or Windsor Financial Planning Office.

I hope this guidance  has been helpful and please take the time to comment. Feedback always appreciated. Please reblog, retweet, put on your Facebook page if you found information helpful.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

SMSF Specialist Adviser 

 Follow SMSFCoach on Twitter Liam Shorte on Linkedin NextGen Wealth on Facebook   

Verante Financial Planning

Tel: 02 98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.

Are SMSF Investors really comparing Hybrids vs. Company Shares?


ID-100385312

Every article I  read at the moment the commentators are more and more sceptical about the recent issues of Australian listed hybrids and notes. They constantly compare the hybrid against the equity in the actual shares of the issuer.

And yes I have been saying to younger clients who wanted to invest that I personally would buy the shares of the blue chip issuers, not the hybrid, because the successful hybrid issue shifts risk from equity investors to the hybrid investors and if you are going to take long-term risk then get recompensed for it from the  issuer.

Yet the majority of people buying these hybrids are not my younger clients and they probably don’t look at the case for hybrids vs. shares. They are my SMSF Retiree and Pre Retiree clients. They look at the investment case of hybrids vs. their HISA (High Interest Savings Accounts) rates and term deposit rates. I know from these clients the majority of the demand for Australian hybrids has come from maturing term deposits and falling interest rates as the RBA cuts.

The banks and their advisers have worked out these “yield plays” seem to be in favour and hybrid issuance is increasing as term deposit and cash rates fall. They are tempting clients to put some of their “defensive portfolio” in to this sector rather than trying to grab some of the Share portfolio allocation.

Commentators say that the banks who are the main issuers are getting the best deal and yes their ratings have been improving when they finalise these issues.

They recommend that you buy the Shares in these companies rather than the “mutton dressed up as lamb” hybrids.

Christopher Joye in the SMH provided the following as an example where he compared the results using CBA PERLS IV vs. CBA Shares themselves over the period July 2007 to July 2012. Yes, with hindsight, you would be far better off owning the shares but they miss the point. Regardless of the outcome many SMSF trustees have a lower risk tolerance and they would be content with the returns from the PERLS IV (25.4% over 5 tumultuous years) during that period while they may have had a meltdown if in the CBA shares during the highlighted volatile period July 07-Mar ’09.

The other point I should make is that clients are making much smaller risk adjusted plays in these hybrids by quality issuers only and are willing to hold to maturity. When they have  a $100K Term Deposit maturing they are placing 10K-30K in to one or two of these hybrids and putting the rest back on Term Deposits. It is recognition that these hybrids do carry more risk and that they understand that risk.

Their aim is not to attain equity like returns but an average portfolio income in the 5.5-6% mark and that can no longer be achieved by cash and TDs alone. So yes they are taking on more risk to achieve their objectives but they are not being silly and getting over exposed. That is why we have avoided Crown, Caltex, Bendigo & Adelaide and even SunCorp issuances.

So yes the Banks get the benefit of cheaper finance but SMSF investors get access to that yield, in bite sized manageable chunks that they require with less volatility than the underlying share. The risks in hybrids are not to be scoffed at but if you do your home work, understand the risk, keep the allocations small and think long term, then they may have a place in your portfolio.

If you want to read more about hybrids generally, the ASX has produced a guide – Understanding hybrid securities – that you can download here.

Are you looking for an advisor that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? Then why now contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

SMSF Specialist Adviser 

 Follow SMSFCoach on Twitter Liam Shorte on Linkedin NextGen Wealth on Facebook   

Verante Financial Planning

Tel: 02 98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

2 Hits to Retirees On The Cards – Term Deposit Rates down & Swanny On The Pillage


Danger to Retirement IncomeWait until you see the news reports this week talking about how great it is for mortgage holders and first home buyers rejoicing at the drop in interest rates by the RBA on Tuesday. In reality only 1/3 of the population has a mortgage but they get the headlines.

However the self-funded retiree or those in pre-retirement looking to save for a decent income in retirement will not be rejoicing as they have to get used to a 4 in front of their Term Deposit rates and worry about the possibility of a 3 within 12 months. These are the people who often don’t have the ability to work a little extra overtime or take on part-time job to supplement their income as older workers aren’t exactly swamped with employment offers.

It may be time to bite the bullet and lock some of your funds in for 2-5 years for the best rate you can get as anything around the 5% mark is looking very attractive and not a big risk in terms of exposure to rising rates as the USA has guaranteed they will keep their rates at or near 0% until 2015. I can’t see Australia getting to far out of step with them in the coming years and it is more likely we will have to lower rates further to weaken our dollar for the economy’s sake.

Other governments are buying our Dollar to invest in what they consider stable Australian Government Bonds and Companies. A blog by my friends at Macro Business lists new countries targeting Aussie assets as reported by various media including the AFR is scary including:

Czech Republic, Kazakhstan, Switzerland, Brazil, Poland, Hong Kong Vietnam, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait,  Qatar , South Korea and of course China with possibly Peru, Malaysia and Singapore as well. All their interest means demand for our currency rises and the exchange rate goes up which the RBA has to try to manage through Interest rate strategies. All that does not bode well for your average Aussie SMSF investor seeking yield or in more simple terms income.

So time to either load up with the best long-term interest rate you can get risk free or prepare to re-enter or increase your exposure to the share market and other sources of income. Be careful chasing yield and understand the risk of any investment paying more than 1-2% above the RBA’s 3.25%.

The second possible hit is harder for me to discuss as I tend to be apolitical in my views under normal circumstances but I feel I have to say something as the leaks to the media in the last few weeks seem to be softening up the SMSF sector for some hard hits.

So on top of the interest rate cuts to your income  we have a Treasurer likely to just compound the problem because in his desperation not to give the Liberals ammunition to throw at him over budget deficits appears willing to destroy the confidence in the Australian Superannuation system by dipping his hands in to the “honey pot” that is the retirement savings of everyday Australians. He is being goaded on by the unions and industry fund sector who control a massive position of the retirement pot but mostly those with insufficient savings to fund their retirement. They seem hell-bent on making sure NO ONE can afford a comfortable retirement and all will depend on an Age Pension to some degree. They have Self Managed Super Funds (SMSF) in their sights! It may be more layers of compliance fees or reduction in tax concessions or some similar theft of your savings by stealth but we know something is coming so better to be prepared.

I urge all SMSF investors and self funded retirees in general to get on the front foot before the Half Year Budget update and be prepared to speak up to your local member of parliament and write tot he press now rather than later to try to stop this government pillaging your savings to fund a  meaningless surplus. If the opposition took the pressure off the need to bring in a surplus that would help too but I know I am dreaming with that idea. The short-term gain of accessing funding from our Superannuation will lead to a huge drop in confidence in a system that has already been hammered in the last few years by Government changes and the CFC.

For further information on the issues raised in this blog please contact our Castle Hill SMSF Centre or Windsor Financial Planning Office.

Are you looking for an advisor that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? Then why now contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

SMSF Specialist Adviser 

 Follow SMSFCoach on Twitter Liam Shorte on Linkedin NextGen Wealth on Facebook   

Verante Financial Planning

Tel: 02 98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.

Don’t lose your insurance cover in the haste to rollover to a SMSF.


Just because you are unhappy with your superannuation investment results is no reason to put you or your family’s future at risk by losing your insurance cover in the process of changing.

don't lose your insurance in a rollover to SMSF

A good professional like an SMSF Specialist Advisor™ will always ensure you assess your insurance needs before withdrawing.

This issue is becoming even more relevant now that the new SMSF rules require Trustees to consider the member’s insurance needs regularly. See here for more detail.

Ok, so you have decided to start your own Self Managed Super Fund or move to one that you feel better meets your needs. That is fine, but one of the things you should look at doing is protecting any cover you have in your current fund by either keeping some money in your current fund to pay for ongoing insurance premiums or taking out replacement insurance cover in the name of your new SMSF.  (more…)

Don’t depend on working longer to save for your Retirement Income


Looking to RetirementMany clients believe delaying their retirement is a solution to inadequate savings, but they often find themselves out of the workforce sooner than they’d planned. None of us has that crystal ball!

It is likely that the shortfall in retirement savings here in Australia stems in part from our “she’ll be right” attitude towards life, which leads us to believe that we do not need to start saving early and that somehow it will all work out ok.

Delaying retirement can be a powerful boost to your superannuation nest-egg. But relying on the ability to work for a few extra years to stretch retirement savings out a little longer is fraught with risk and does not reflect personal and family health or other issues that may arise. As an example I have had some clients forced to retire to look after their grandchildren due to the illness of the parent.

If you played with any retirement planning calculator or have spoken to an adviser, the “work a little longer” solution would have been investigated and many put it forward as the solution to the GFC “dip” (read plunge) in savings.

The concept is easy to grasp: By working longer then you originally planned, you get more years of concessionally taxed growth in your superannuation accounts especially if you used a Transition to Retirement Pension from 55 or 60. You can also continue to salary sacrifice and make non-concessional contributions while getting the benefit of the Senior And Pensioners Tax Offset (SAPTO) that I mentioned a few weeks ago here.

The idea is the longer you work and save and more you get into a superannuation income stream then your capital will last longer and you may also benefit from more Age Pension when required.

Back to reality with a jolt!

But there is a huge disconnect between workers’ expectations and retirement reality. Over half of the retirees surveyed in a US study last year said they left the workforce earlier than planned, and just 8% of them said that positive factors — such as the ability to afford early retirement — prompted the move. For the vast majority of early retirees, negative circumstances, such as personal or spouse health problems or company downsizing played a role.

40% of Australians will suffer a critical illness before age 65 (Cologne Life Re study). They will most likely survive but their retirement funding will be devastated.

The 2015 Productivity Commission report on post-retirement shows that about 40 per cent of Australians who retire between the age of 60 and 64 do so involuntarily, either because of their own or a family member’s ill health, or redundancy.

For those aged between 65 and 69 who retire involuntarily is not that different, while for younger age groups most people who retire do so involuntarily.

Retirement ages

Clearly, workers relying on delayed retirement are rolling the dice. Yet, most people discount the future so much that they’re willing to take that gamble. May hope that an inheritance will save the day but do not realise that age care costs and parents living longer may eat heavily into any expected inheritance.

Strangely the people most likely to plan on working a few more years to boost their retirement security may actually have the least ability to postpone their retirement. People who suffer an illness or injury  are more likely than those in good health to have pushed back their expected retirement date in recent years, according to  a report from consulting firm Towers Watson. Yet health problems or disabilities were cited by more than half of retirees forced to retire earlier than planned.

Don’t put you head in the sand – start now

As psychologists are quick to point out, we all have that inner voice that loves to procrastinate who loves to put off till tomorrow what we should do today – beause its “all too hard to get your head around”. Saving more today is a sure thing, and extra years in the workforce are anything but. If you know you don’t have enough, you should start saving more today, because that’s by far the less risky alternative.

Let’s look at an example using the Retirement Planner on the MoneySmart.gov.au site for a 55-year-old pre-retiree with just $30K in superannuation. If she earns $80,000, makes $17,500 annual salary sacrifice contributions (in addition to Employers SGC contributions of 9.5%)  and earns a 7.5% return pre retirement and 6.5% after, she could be looking at an Income in retirement of $32,143 by age 67 including the Age Pension. If she’s forced to retire at that point, she’s still in better shape than most Australian’s. And if she can continue working, she  counld improve on this lifestyle with a better retirement income.

Retirement Income

A final don’t is cancelling TPD or Income Protection insurances to save money while in your most productive earning years (read here for more on that subject). The loss of 5-10 years of earnings potential is one guaranteed way to destroy your lifestyle in retirement. Your ability to earn is your biggest asset

Are you looking for an advisor that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? Then why now contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

SMSF Specialist Adviser 

 Follow SMSFCoach on Twitter Liam Shorte on Linkedin NextGen Wealth on Facebook   

Verante Financial Planning

Tel: 02 98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.

Think twice before cancelling insurances as you get older.


Do you know that the average person cancels their personal insurance about 1-2 years before an claimable illness strikes! The average age a person discontinues one or more of three types of living insurance policies – cover for disability, critical illness/trauma and income protection – is 45 years yet the average age for a claim is 46.5 years. (source TAL)

As mentioned in a previous blog the SMSF regulations now require Self Managed Superannuation Fund Trustees to consider Insurance as part of the SMSF Investment Strategy . TheRisk Management following applies to everyone regardless of the type of investor you are or the structure you use to save for retirement.

I see many clients in our Castle Hill and Windsor offices in their late 50’s who have cancelled their life and income protection insurances before they have come to see me. Usually they say it is because they have paid off their mortgage and are debt free so they didn’t feel they needed cover any longer.

Their focus now was on expense reduction and saving via salary sacrifice to superannuation and even some after tax contributions from savings.

While it is great to see them focus on saving for retirement and budgeting, what they don’t realise is that in cancelling insurances it is their retirement lifestyle or that of their spouse they are no longer insuring and not just their current needs.

With 5-15 years of focused savings towards a retirement nest egg they can substantially improve their lifestyle after retirement. However those dreams of a happy retirement can all be taken away with a diagnosis of cancer or a stroke that inhibits them working for a prolonged period.

You don’t just find yourself financing time off work and medical expenses but also lose out on the employer super contributions and salary sacrifice as well or worse for a small business owner, you face the expense of a getting someone to cover for you to keep the business afloat.

To realistically assess if you need to maintain your Life, Trauma or Income Protection insurance, you need to think through the worst-case scenario. If you were unable to work for 3 years due to an illness today, how would you and your loved ones cope financially?

  • Would you be able to meet ongoing living expenses like food, clothing, changing the car, pay for private health insurance premiums, etc? (this assumes mortgage paid off)
  • Would you have the liquid funds to cover additional expenses or loss in income (e.g., gap in your medical fees, time off work for your spouse to take care of you,
  • What would happen to your retirement plans and would you be able to save enough money to see the kids through the final college years or fund your retirement comfortably?
  • What if you were actually permanently disabled and they had all the costs of rearranging the home, medical care and transport options for you.

In all honesty, it is always a struggle when you lose your earning capacity. The last thing you need compounding the situation are financial concerns. Insurance helps make sure that you and the people you care about will be provided for financially, even if you’re not around to care for them yourself.

So whether you’re in retail, industry or a Self Managed Super Fund, take a moment to consider how insurance might fit into your retirement plans. We can look at ways to reduce the cover and costs to keep them affordable and provide that protection for you and your family.

If you think you may need to review your Insurances then you can contact us to offer you advice on your options. As well as offering advice on Insurances, Superannuation and SMSF’s our advisers can also offer you help in many other area’s you may be experiencing problems such as:

  • Financial Planning,
  • Tax Planning,
  • Debt Consolidation,
  • Investment Portfolios,
  • Estate Planning,
  • SMSF Trustee queries.

Have you found this blog helpful? Pass it on. Social media buttons beneath the article.

Are you looking for an advisor that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? Then why now contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

SMSF Specialist Adviser 

 Follow SMSFCoach on Twitter Liam Shorte on Linkedin NextGen Wealth on Facebook   

Verante Financial Planning

Tel: 02 98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.

Self Managed Super Funds must include an Insurance Needs Analysis as part of the fund’s SMSF Investment Strategy.


Amendments to the SIS Regulations in place from August 2012 require trustees of SMSFs by law:

  1.  to consider whether insurance cover should be held by the fund on the lives of the members;
  2. to review that decision as SMSF trustees regularly as part of the review the investment strategy of the fund.

The obligation (which is set out in SIS Reg 4.09(2)(e)) requires the trustees to apply their minds to whether  “for a self managed superannuation fund – whether the trustees of the fund should hold a contract of insurance that provides insurance cover for one or more members of the fund.”

This is a major step up in terms of duties from the old regulations and I believe has been prompted by the June 2010 Super System Review Panel report noting that less than 13% of SMSFs have insurance. Now in reality the major factor to consider is probably that this low figure is a result of most SMSF members being over 55 with higher super balances and low personal debt so the need for any insurance may be negligible.

Insurance protection

Image courtesy of iosphere at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

So what insurance covers are we talking about?  Well it is not simply life insurance, and could include total permanent disability cover and income protection cover that insurers make available via superannuation.

This is not an obligation on the fund to take out each of these insurance covers – the trustees must merely consider the issue.

To prove for the purpose of the annual audit that the trustees have considered the issue, the trustees will have to prepare minutes/resolutions which:

  • acknowledges that the trustees are aware of the obligation to consider insurance cover;
  • shows that the trustees have considered the need for insurance cover for each of the members of the fund;
  • documents that they have implemented cover where possible to meet those needs of the individual members and of the fund itself (in the case of LRBA) or
  • acknowledges that the trustees have determined that insurance is or is not required for a particular member(s)

As is the case with many clients that I take care of the trustees may conclude that no insurance cover is required in respect of a particular member for a variety of reasons such as:

  • when the member has indicated that they have no need for cover as their debts are low and needs are fully funded;
  • the member has sufficient insurance cover in other super funds (we often keep employer or industry funds open to avail of lower group rates);
  • the member has other insurance arrangements outside of the super;
  • that due to illness or injury the cost of premium is too high for the cover provided;
  • when the member has actually been declined for cover due to occupation or pre-existing conditions;
  • that the member does not believe in insurance or is unwilling to pay the cost of the premium.

So how far do you go as a Trustee in documenting your reasons for their decision? Is a full-blown explanation required or a simple statement that they have considered the issue and have come to a set conclusion either way for each member?

Whilst going into detail may sound the correct option to show the trustees have fully discharged their duty, those reasons set down in writing could be questioned later and the process found negligent which may expose the trustees to claims that they have breached their duties.  You may think that an SMSF most often consisting of mum and dad and maybe a few children in a family group like this may be unlikely to end in conflict but potential Beneficiaries of Estates, with the advantage of perfect hindsight, may seek redress to put pressure on trustees to consider their claims.

A possible solution may be for the trustees to discharge their duty by requesting from each member to indicate whether the member wishes to have cover for any or all risks identified in the fund.  If a member said that they do not wish to have or do not need, and will not submit to any underwriting requirements, then the trustees would be in a position to claim that they either have discharged their duty to the member.

As the new requirement has been attached to the investment strategy operating standard of SIS Reg 4.09, it seems that the trustees will also have to reconsider the issue of insurance each time the investment strategy is reviewed and on the occurrence of any significant change to the circumstances of a member or the fund such as a large contribution or withdrawal.

It is time to decide how you will comply with the new rules so please contact us if you need assistance or want to explore your options. Our risk specialists can review existing insurances and provide quotes on a range of covers from suitable insurance companies.

Want to do some preliminary investigations yourself? Why not try this decent Insurance Needs Calculator by clicking here, and then make an appointment to discuss the results with us.

I hope this guidance  has been helpful and please take the time to comment. Feedback always appreciated. Please reblog, retweet, put on your Facebook page etc to make sure Trustees are aware of the changes.

Are you looking for an advisor that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? Then why now contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

SMSF Specialist Adviser 

 Follow SMSFCoach on Twitter Liam Shorte on Linkedin NextGen Wealth on Facebook   

Verante Financial Planning

Tel: 02 98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of  Viridian Advisory Pty Ltd (ABN 34 605 438 042) (AFSL 476223)

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.

Property through super in a SMSF – Part 1: Background


PropertyFrom the media hype you should already know that self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) can borrow funds to purchase assets, provided the borrowing satisfies certain requirements outlined in the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993. This can be a very attractive option for SMSF trustees for a number of reasons.

This is Part 1 of a 3 part series. In this first article, we will look at the background to the limited recourse borrowing arrangements that can be used by SMSFs to invest in an asset, specifically a residential or commercial property.

Limited recourse borrowing arrangements

While the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act contains a general prohibition against borrowing, SMSF trustees have been able to borrow to acquire assets since September 2007. The Act was further amended in July 2010 with the introduction of new legislation that clarified the intended operation of the borrowing exemption. The rules around the use of borrowed funds for repair and improvement and what is an acquirable asset were further clarified in 2012.

SMSFs may borrow funds to acquire an asset provided the following conditions are satisfied:

1) Single acquirable asset: The borrowed funds must be used to acquire a single asset or a collection of identical assets that have the same market value (which are together treated as a single asset), which the fund would otherwise be permitted to acquire. A single asset could be a parcel of, for example, 1000 ANZ Bank shares, but a parcel of 500 ANZ Bank shares and 500 Woolworth’s shares would not meet the definition of a single asset.

2) Restriction on improvements: The borrowed funds are not to be used to improve the acquirable asset. The ATO recently confirmed its position in relation to repairs vs. improvements of an asset acquired through a limited recourse borrowing arrangement in Self Managed Superannuation Funds Ruling SMSFR 2012/1. For example, if a fire damages part of a kitchen (e.g. the cooktop, benches, walls and the ceiling), the SMSF trustee could use the borrowed funds to restore or replace the damaged part of the kitchen with modern equivalent materials or appliances, but it could not use the borrowed funds to extend the size of the kitchen (as this would be considered an improvement).

3) Beneficial ownership: The acquired asset must be held on a trust where the super fund holds the beneficial interest in the acquired asset. This requires what is known commonly as a ‘bare trust’ or a ‘custodian trust’ to be registered as on the title as the legal owner. This is one of the reasons why the process can get complicated and is the main mistake made in implementing this strategy without doing the groundwork first.

4) Legal ownership: the documentation makes it very clear that the actual beneficial owner is the trustee of the self-managed super fund. After acquiring this beneficial interest, the SMSF has the right to acquire the legal ownership of the asset once it has repaid in full the lending for the property purchase.

5) Limited recourse rights of lender on default: If the fund defaults on the borrowing, the rights of the lender under the arrangement are limited to rights relating to the acquired asset. In other words, the lender’s rights are limited to repossessing and disposing of the asset to recover funds. The lender cannot recover funds from the superannuation fund’s other assets or undertakings. However it can become common practice for the lenders to seek personal guarantees from the trustees in their private capacity to add a layer of protection for the lender

6) Restriction on replacement assets: The acquired asset can be replaced by another acquirable asset (but only in very limited circumstances). For example, the proceeds of a claim after a fire destroys a four-bedroom home could be used to rebuild a four-bedroom home in a newer style but you could not build three town-houses on the same site using the funds.

Types of property that can be acquired

An SMSF can only borrow money to acquire an asset if it would not be prohibited from investing in that asset directly under the Act. This includes residential units, houses, commercial property like office units, industrial warehouses and a current flavour of the day: 7/11 stores! A SMSF is prohibited from intentionally acquiring an asset from a related party of the fund.

The exception, business real property, must be acquired for market value but there are Stamp duty exemptions in some States liked Section 62A of the NSW Stamp Duties act. Business real property is an interest in real property where the property is used wholly and exclusively in one or more businesses. It does not have to be in your own business but it can be and this is why the strategy has been so popular with business people.

The borrowing structure

This diagram shows a typical limited recourse borrowing structure:

Borrowing through SMSF

Funding Options

There are two main funding options available:

1) Related party lending: There is no restriction on you, your family, a related trust, or similar entity lending the money to the SMSF. The benefits of this are that you can avoid costly bank legal adviser fees and other incidental costs of borrowing from a bank. You must follow the suggested ‘Safe Harbour Provisions’ outlined in ATO guidance on related party SMSF loans (LRBAs) . You cannot put in place a loan that is worse in commercial terms for the SMSF.

In any self -funding scenario you have to expect greater scrutiny by the auditor and regulators so as to avoid any compliance issues, SMSF members choosing self-funding should ensure their loan to the fund is properly documented and meets the requirements of the SIS Act. For example, the trustee of the SMSF must ensure that all investments are conducted on an arm’s length basis. This means that a proper lease agreement must be in place, repayments must be scheduled and met and as mentioned above the terms of the loan cannot disadvantage the SMSF in comparison to what’s available in the market.

2) Third party lending: Nearly all the major banks, and some specialised non-bank lenders, have developed SMSF loan packages specifically tailored to meet the requirements of the Act. I really do recommend that you seek advice from a broker who has experience in this area as the terms and conditions offered by the various lenders differ dramatically as some deal with them through their residential lending division and others through their commercial divisions.

The bottom line:  Placing real estate assets into your self-managed superannuation fund can be both straightforward and financially sensible, but there are certain rules you need to follow carefully, In the next instalment of our SMSF session we will guide you through the steps involved in the process from start to finish. Please seek independent professional advice to ensure that any proposed strategy complies with the law, because there are severe penalties that can apply if the trustee gets it wrong.

NEXT STEP : THE PROCESS OF BUYING PROPERTY IN AN SMSF (all states are slightly different but follow these steps to ensure you don’t fall foul of the rules)

As always please contact me if you want to look at your own options. You can make an appointment by clicking here. We have offices in Castle Hill and Windsor but can meet clients anywhere in Sydney or via Teams or Zoom or FaceTime .

Liam Shorte B.Bus FSSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & Fellow SMSF Specialist Advisor™

     

Tel: 02 98993693, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002, Norwest NSW 2153

40/8 Victoria Ave Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Advisory Pty Ltd ABN 34 605 438 042, AFSL 476223

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.