Liam Shorte

Putting people back in control of their wealth
SMSF Adviser of the Year - Winner 2025
SMSF Adviser of the Year - Finalist 2025
SMSF Adviser of the Year 2024
IFA 2023 Excellence Awards – SMSF Advisor of the Year – Finalist
IFA 2021 Excellence Awards – SMSF Advisor of the Year – WINNER!!
IFA 2022 Excellence Awards – SMSF Advisor of the Year – Finalist
Get advice – Have a chat
Free Email Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe and be first to receive notifications of new posts by email. Go on it's FREE!

Email Address:

Join 6,177 other subscribers
Top Posts & Pages
Connect with me
Recent Tweets
Tweets by SMSFCoach
View William Shorte's Adviser Ratings profile
https://www.adviserratings.com.au/widget/278214/profile.js

All posts tagged Investment

Have you contributed over your Superannuation limit? Here is what happens next

So you or your employer have mistimed contributions or doubled up on a payment to you super. This can happen in a number of ways:

Employer paid June 2017 contribution in July last year without you knowing;
You worked out your salary sacrifice based on $25,000 less employer contributions on your salary but forgot they pay SG on bonuses too!;
Employer brought forward June 2018 contributions to ensure they got a tax deduction early;
You received a spouse contribution but did not realise this counted towards your cap;
You, your tax agent or super fund accountant has made an error in claiming tax deductions for nonconcessional contributions
Just a genuine mistake.

How do you manage the mistake?

Do nothing until the ATO issues you with a Determination that you have exceeded one of your caps. You cannot just take the funds back out of your SMSF. The ATO will issue the determination and then provide you with a Release Authority which can be processed on paper or (coming soon) via My.Gov.au/mygov

You need to approve the commutation of the excess contribution amount from your account by the ATO as soon as possible after you receive a determination. This will limit the amount of penalty interest that you will be liable to pay.

If you exceed the concessional contributions cap

If you have excess concessional contributions the ATO will issue you with an excess concessional contributions determination. The determination advises you that your excess concessional contribution amount has been included as assessable income in your tax return. It also advises what actions are required of you. The excess concessional contribution determination contains the:

amount of the excess concessional contributions
amount of the excess concessional contributions charge
period of the excess concessional contributions charge
rate of the excess concessional contributions charge.

With your determination, you will also receive an income tax return Notice of assessment/ Notice of amended assessment.

If the contribution information within the determination is incorrect, either:

contact your super fund accountant/administrator and your personal tax agent to have them re-report any incorrectly reported contributions
amend your tax return if you did not claim the correct personal super contribution deduction in your tax return, or did not claim it at the correct label.

If you exceed the non-concessional contributions cap

You now have 60 days (see details of how this has improved below) from the date of your determination, to choose one of the following options:

Option 1 – Release the excess from your super funds

You can elect to release all your excess non-concessional contributions and 85% of your associated earnings from your super funds.

The full associated earnings amount stated in your determination will be included in your assessable income and taxed at your marginal rate of tax. A non-refundable tax offset equal to 15% of your associated earnings is applied to recognise any tax paid by your super fund.

The ATO will issue a release authority to the super funds you nominate and they will pay this amount directly to the ATO.

Option 2 – Leave your excess non-concessional contributions in your super funds

If you choose not to release your excess non-concessional contributions from your super funds, you receive an excess non-concessional contributions tax assessment. The excess amount is taxed at the highest marginal tax rate. IF you have more than one account/fund then you must elect a fund to release your excess non-concessional contributions tax from.

You must select this option if your only fund is a defined benefit.

If you do nothing

The ATO will ask your super funds to release and send amounts to them. They will also amend your income tax assessment to include your associated earnings. You will pay tax on your associated earnings at your marginal tax rate. Because of the delay the tax on associated earnings will be higher.

The ATO will use the money released to pay any tax or Australian government debts and refund any remaining balance to you

If you have no money left in super for any reason, they will amend your income tax assessment to include your associated earnings amount. You will pay tax on your associated earnings at your marginal tax rate.

If your only super interest is held in a defined benefit fund or a non-commutable super income stream and the fund cannot or will not voluntarily release The ATO will send you an excess non-concessional contributions tax assessment

STOP! my head is hurting!

Finally some simplification! From 1 July 2018 the release authority process for excess contributions and Division 293 liabilities will be consistent and streamlined. The changes will apply to the following release authorities:

excess concessional contributions
excess non-concessional contributions
excess non-concessional contributions tax
division 293 due and payable
division 293 deferred debt.

The changes include:

•Standard 60 day time frame for when an individual could request to release an amount from super (previously this ranged between 21 to 60 days)

•The individual makes a request when replying to the ATO’s determination (this can be done via their myGov account), but it is the ATO that submits the release authority to the super fund. Prior to the rule change, individuals could also submit the release authority directly to the super fund

•The payment is always made to the ATO, credited to the individual’s tax liability with any residual amounts then paid to the individual

•The default election for excess non-concessional contributions is to release the contribution and 85% of the associated earnings. This prevents what is generally the more detrimental position of applying the top marginal tax rate on the excess contribution unreleased, from occurring. For example this may have occurred in the past if the individual is away on holidays when they receive the notice of determination

Temporary timeframe extension for SMSF and APRA funds to release the money.

From 1 July 2018 the Commissioner of Taxation has temporarily extended the timeframes for the return and payment of streamlined release authorities from 10 to 20 business days.

The change applies to release authorities for excess contributions and Div 293 liabilities.

This temporary extension will continue until the ATO digitises their release authority process. When they change the process from paper to being managed via SuperStream the system will return to the legislated 10 business days.

This extension was given after practitioners raised concerns over their ability to meet this legislated time frame to return their release authority statement, with a paper form being the only channel available. Yeah like we trust Australia Post to get anything back quickly!

For further information please see the following https://www.ato.gov.au/…/Release-authority-streamlining-up…/

I hope this guidance has been helpful and please take the time to comment. Feedback always appreciated. Please reblog, retweet, like on Facebook etc to make sure we get the news out there. As always please contact me if you want to look at your own options. We have offices in Castle Hill and Windsor but can meet clients anywhere in Sydney or via Skype. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.

1 Comment

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on August 14, 2018 • Permalink

Posted in News & Stats, Pensions, Retirement Planning, SMSF Management

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on August 14, 2018

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2018/08/14/have-you-contributed-over-your-superannuation-limit-here-is-what-happens-next/

Who will mind my super and take care of me? – SMSF Member Incapacity and Estate Planning Checklist

What’s your plan for future incapacity

I recently did a co-presentation with Louise Biti from Aged Care Steps for the Self Managed Superannuation Fund Association on how SMSF Trustees can plan for incapacity or just that time when they no longer wish to run their fund. The response was great and the questions from the floor really brought it home to us that people are very concerned about how they pass control of their wealth and well-being to others. A copy of the presentation slides are available here . As part of my preparation I developed a simple checklist of issues that SMSF trustees should use when they consider their options. This list is not exhaustive so please add your own tips or suggestions in the comments section below.

When planning for the management of your funds in your SMSF you must first read the Deed!

You do have an Original copy of the Deed or a Certified copy don’t you?

Who do you want to manage your fund if you die or are incapacitated?

On death for Corporate Trustees you leave the shares in the trustee company via your will to the person(s) so they have a right to be a director of the trustee company.
For incapacity you provide an Enduring Power of Attorney (EPOA) and when required you resign as a director and they are appointed in your place. If it is your spouse and they are the only other member then they become Sole Director.
On death for Individual Trustees your Executor will usually have a right to be a trustee of the fund.
For incapacity you provide an Enduring Power of Attorney and when required you resign as a trustee and they are appointed in your place. If it is your spouse and they are the only other member then they need to find a second person to act as a trustee or move to a sole director company trustee.

What to consider in the choice of an EPOA/Executor

Are they good with money and making decisions?
Will they be willing to seek advice from specialists if necessary?
Will there be conflict between beneficiaries – Sibling rivalry? Blended families?
Should you consider 2 or more EPOAs/Executors for safety or support
a power of attorney (or POA) can either become effective immediately, or upon the occurrence of a future event (such as your mental incapacity).
A power of attorney can have specific clauses with instructions for the operation of the power.
If you have a spouse or dependant you may want to include Dependants Clauses to ensure your funds can be used for their needs.
You may want to consider a Conflict of Interest clause to allow a EPOA to make decisions that may suit them as well as you but to the detriment of other possible beneficiaries.

Who do you want to receive your SMSF account balance?

For Spouse / Dependants you should consider using a Reversionary Pension election or Non-Lapsing Binding Death Benefit Nomination direct to beneficiaries or via your will using Non-lapsing Binding Death Nomination to your Legal Personal Representative with option in your will to set up a Testamentary Trust. Normal BDBNs lapse after 3 years.
For Adult children you can use Non-Lapsing Binding Death Benefit Nomination direct to beneficiary or via your will using non-lapsing binding nomination to Legal Personal Representative with option in your will to set up a Testamentary Trust
For your parents, your siblings or non-family via your will using Non-lapsing Binding Death Benefit Nomination to your Legal Personal Representative with option in your will to set up a Testamentary Trust
Do any of the beneficiaries in your Will have special needs? For disabled beneficiaries consider a Special Disability Trust. For those poor with money or in a highly litigious career or in possible bankruptcy then a Testamentary Trust should be considered.

Who do you want to manage your care options if you are incapacitated?

Ensure you have an Enduring Power of Guardianship in place so that your lifestyle and medical treatment decisions can be made by a trusted family member or friend in the event that you become mentally incapable?
Do you have an Advanced Healthcare Directive in place in the event that you become terminally ill and are unable to articulate your wishes?
Have you spoken to your chosen Enduring Guardian so they are clear on your wishes and preferences, explained why you have made those decisions so that they can discuss these with any family members who have cause to question your wishes.

What to consider in the choice of an Enduring Guardian

Are they good with making personal decisions under pressure?
Will there be conflict with other family that they can handle– Sibling rivalry? Blended families?
Should you consider 2 or more EGs for safety or support

Information your Attorneys/Executors will need

Bank Accounts and Investments:

The BSB and account numbers for any accounts or credit cards you have.
The HIN, SRN of any Personal or SMSF shareholdings and
Account IDs for Share Brokers, Online Banking and Managed Fund holdings
Location of property deeds and contact details for Property manager

Insurance:

Details of policies such as the policy number and type of insurance.
Life and TPD cover, Motor vehicles, House Insurance, Private Medical Insurance and Funeral Plans

Advisers:

If you have an accountant, financial planner, lawyer or other professional advisor include their contact details.

Business Records:

If you have a business include details of where the company records are kept and the computer the ASIC Corporate Key is on.

Your secret place:
If important documents such as certificates of property title, jewellery and other valuables or personal items are being held in safe custody elsewhere or stashed in the attic then you should identify the location.

Your digital life:

Include all your email login in details and loyalty scheme account details. This includes your membership to social media and cloud data sites so your executors and family may be able to access your on-line data, including books or music files.
Appoint a Legacy Contact if you use Facebook.
Instructions on what is and isn’t to be shared with family

Direct Debits:

If you have any direct debits in place you should include details so that they can be cancelled pending a grant of probate.

Superannuation:

Do you have other superannuation accounts. Your most recent superannuation statement(s) should also be included. If it is self-managed super the financial statements should be included.

IMPORTANT POINT: Talk regularly to your Executors and Powers of Attorney and Enduring Guardian
Discuss your wishes in terms of lifestyle, healthcare and treatment options with your chosen Attorney and Guardian and if possible with the broader family and make sure that they understand your wishes. Australian’s are very reluctant to talk about illness or death but it is essential to ensure your wishes are followed and to avoid family conflict.

As I mentioned at the start this list is not exhaustive so please add your own tips or suggestions in the comments section below.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

Leave a comment

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on May 21, 2018 • Permalink

Posted in Checklists, Enduring Power of Attorney, Estate Planning, News & Stats, Pensions, Retirement Planning, SMSF Management

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on May 21, 2018

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2018/05/21/who-will-mind-my-super-and-take-care-of-me-smsf-member-incapacity-and-estate-planning-checklist/

Phew! SCOMO delivers an SMSF friendly 2018-19 Federal Budget

Self-funded retirees have felt like punching bags for the last few years with hit after hit chipping away at their ability to fend for themselves within the rules they had relied upon in making their savings plans over the last 30 years. Combine the changing of goal posts with low interest rates and blue-chip underperformance from the banks, telcos and utilities and they are not to be blamed for thinking a hex had been put on them.

So an SMSF friendly budget is the welcome news coming out of the 2018-19 Federal Budget. With many of us SMSF Specialists and you the SMSF members still working through the wide-reaching and complex superannuation changes which took effect from 1 July 2017, this Federal Budget will provide much needed stability while looking to reduce costs for SMSFs and prove additional flexibility.

The key changes proposed for SMSFs and superannuation are:

Three-yearly audit cycle for some self-managed superannuation funds.

The Government will change the annual SMSF audit requirement to a three yearly requirement for SMSFs with a history of good record keeping and compliance. The measure will start on 1 July 2019 for SMSF trustees that have a history of three consecutive years of clear audit reports and that have lodged the fund’s annual returns in a timely manner.

One concern I have is if trustees make a mistake in year 1 that is not discovered until year 3, will they face 3 years interest charges on the penalties.

Expanding the SMSF member limit from four to six

As already announced, the Federal Government confirmed its decision to expand the number of members allowed in an SMSF from four to six. Expanding the definition of an SMSF to a fund with a maximum of six members will provide greater flexibility in how funds can be structured.

Whilst there are some concerns over making decisions I like this move where as mum and dad in their later years want to reduce their involvement but they want help rather with the fund rather than moving to separate retail funds. It may help prevent elder Financial abuse where instead of one child assuming control of the SMSF, more of the family could be involved. Temptation and inheritance impatience is always there for one person but add a few others in to the decision making and the risk of financial abuse reduces considerably.

Also 6 members of a family small business allows for later drawdown from the parents accounts and recontribution for younger family members to retain business real property in the fund after death of the older generation.

Note; you will need to ensure your trust deed allows more than 4 members and it most likely won’t so you will need to update the trust deed first before accepting new members. READ THE DEED

Over 65, 1 additional year Work test exemption

The Government will provide more time for Australians aged 65 to 74 to boost their retirement savings, by introducing an exemption from the superannuation work test.This exemption will apply where an individual’s total superannuation balance is below $300,000 and will permit voluntary superannuation contributions in the first year that they do not meet the work test requirements.

This is good but limited in its scope as more and More people have reached the $300k level because of Super Guarantee Contributions for most since 1992 or before for some. But it is a female friendly move as they are most likely to have lower balances

Life insurance cover in super to be opt-in for individuals under 25 years of age.

The Government will legislate that life insurance cover in superannuation will be opt-in for those individuals under 25 years of age or with account balances under $6000 to ensure that unnecessary fees do not erode smaller balances.

Life insurance cover will also cease where no contributions have been made for a period of 13 months.

If you have kept a retail or industry fund open with small balances to retain insurances you may need to put a small annual contribution in place (I would recommend $100 per half year just in case) to ensure it does not get tagged as dormant.

Older Australian package

The Government introduced the following measures to enhance the standard of living older Australians:

• Increase to the Pension Work Bonus from $250 to $300 per fortnight.

• Amendments to the pension means test rules to encourage the take up of lifetime retirement income products.

• Expansion of the Pensions Loan Scheme to allow more Australians to use the equity in their homes to increase their incomes.

I think this will be a major bonus for those with a lumpy asset or shareholding’s they wish to retain but need more cashflow. At a current rate of 5.25% the Pensions Loan Scheme is a very decent rate and security that you are borrowing from a bank or predatory lender based on a brokers conflicted commissions.

Personal income tax bracket changes (take most these with a pinch of salt!)

The Government has provided personal income tax relief to lower and middle income earners. A Low and Middle Income Tax Offset will now be available for individuals with incomes of up to $125,333.

The $87,000 income threshold, above which a 37 per cent tax rate applies, will increase to $90,000.

Other changes

• A surplus of $2.2 billion is expected in 2019-20, one year ahead of schedule.

• The Government’s planned increase in the Medicare levy from 2 per cent to 2.5 per cent, to fund the National Disability Insurance Scheme, will now not go ahead due to increased tax revenues.

How can we help?

Some of these measures may open up strategy options for you and your family.

If you have any questions or would like further clarification in regards to any of the above measures outlined in the 2018-19 Federal Budget, please feel free to give me a call or email to arrange a time to meet or talk by phone so that we can discuss your particular requirements in more detail.

Are you looking for an advisor that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? then why now contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

4 Comments

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on May 9, 2018 • Permalink

Posted in Contribution Strategies, Financial Planning, Retirement Planning, SMSF Management, Trustee

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on May 9, 2018

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2018/05/09/phew-scomo-delivers-an-smsf-friendly-2018-19-federal-budget/

10 Tips for Transitioning in to Retirement in Australia

Adapted from ‘Managing Transitions’ by William Bridges.

Retirement. It’s something you’ve thought about for years but kept saying you will deal with it nearer the time. But how do you make sure you’re ready to deal with change when you do come to retire?

So this blog is not about money, it’s about managing change, anxiety and relationships during one of the biggest changes in your life. It has been adapted from an US article.

Retirement might be your time to do your own thing, to travel overseas, go bush in the outback, spend quality time with your loved ones, to return to education, start a different career, take up a volunteer activity, begin an exercise program, or pursue a hobby. There are so many things you could be doing with your newfound time. It seems as though the possibilities for life changes in retirement are endless. But many struggle in that initial period.

Even though you are excited to enter this new stage of life, the amount of change can feel overwhelming and it can intimidating to handle change in retirement. If a lifetime of work demanded much of your time and attention, you may not have had the opportunity to develop many leisure time interests. You may find yourself looking for new things to do and get involved with.

If many of your social activities have involved people from work, you may want and need to develop friendships that are based on your new interests (think about Rotary, Probus, Men’s Shed, Book Club, Classic Car Group, Yoga, Red Hat Society, Bush Walking Club etc.). If you are retiring and adjusting to an empty nest at the same time, you may feel especially challenged handling all of this change associated with retirement. Despite wanting to retire, adapting to so many changes in your life can be difficult.

How you’ve handled change during your lifetime can offer insight into how well you’ll adapt to change in retirement. Having an awareness of how to better manage change can improve your adjustment to retirement.

Here are ten questions to ask yourself about handling life changes in retirement:

1. What changes do you want to make in your life? This is a big question but you probably have some ideas of things you’d like to start doing or do more of. Exercise, travel, family time and household projects are all common starting points. Make a list and begin to identify all the ways you want to change your life in retirement. Tip for Ladies: Is your husband struggling for ideas? Try “101 Things to Do With A Retired Man: … to Get Him Out From Under Your Feet!”

2. Why do you want to make these changes? It’s not enough to say you want to improve your diet or read more books. It’s time to figure out the benefits of making these changes. What will you gain by eating differently or reading more? Recognise why you want to make the change so that you’ll be encouraged to follow through with it.

3. What change do you want to make first? If you’ve been thinking about all you could do in retirement, you may discover that it’s hard to figure out where to begin. Feeling overwhelmed by the choices may mean that you don’t select anything. Keep it simple. If you could change just one thing, what would it be?

4. What impact will your changes have on others? Often if we change something in our life, it has a domino effect. If you go back to school, you may need to use weekend time for studying. If your volunteer project involves evenings, you may need to give up some family time. Recognise that others in your life may question the changes that involve them. Talk about the upcoming changes with significant others and gain their support.

5. Are you willing to change? Are you going to be frustrated making a change in your life when it isn’t something you truly want to do? If you’re a stay-at-home person, don’t kid yourself and try to adopt a freewheeling, caravanning lifestyle just because others say you’ll love it. This is could be a change that you won’t really be willing to make long-term.

6. Are you ready to change? It’s one thing to say you want to start exercising, volunteering or start learning a language. Doing it may be harder than you think. You may be someone who finds change is really difficult. If that’s you, prepare yourself mentally for more challenges right at the start.

7. Are you prepared to make the effort? Making changes in your life requires an effort. Be ready for a learning curve and some inherent frustrations. As adults, we get comfortable in our habits and routines. If you really want to begin an exercise program, you may need a significant amount of willpower to get yourself started.

8. Who can help you change? When you’re learning something new, ask for help. Join a group, connect online or ask others in your network for advice. You may have spent your whole life wanting to figure things out for yourself. Recognise that your time now is a valuable resource. Don’t waste it. Ask for help.

9. Can you check your ego at the door? The first time you try doing something new, it’s likely you won’t be great at it. New things take practice. Don’t let your fear of failure or ego get in the way of learning something new. Look at it this way—you made it this far in life, you are certainly capable of learning a yoga pose or to put up shelves.

10. Are you seeing the results you expected? Make your changes and give yourself a reasonable amount of time to get used to them. Are you seeing the benefits you expected? If not, chalk it up to good experience and move on.

Accept that retirement will bring many changes in your life. Increasing your awareness about how you adapt to change will contribute to your overall retirement happiness.

Looking for an adviser that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? Then why not contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options. Do it! make 2018 the year to get organised or it will be 2028 before you know it.

Please consider passing on this article to family or friends. Pay it forward!

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

I have adapted this content to Australian circumstances from an original American article on retirementstyle.com By Deborah Williams

Leave a comment

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on April 10, 2018 • Permalink

Posted in Lifestyle, Retirement Planning

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on April 10, 2018

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2018/04/10/10-tips-for-transitioning-in-to-retirement-in-australia/

Best Apolitical Analysis of Franking Credit Refund Removal Debate

Over this last week I have read so many politically biased responses to Bill Shorten’s proposed strategy to stop the refunds of franking credits that I despaired and I know it is going to be a political football rather than part of comprehensive tax reform. Then I came across a really well explained and positioned argument from Scott Phillips of The Motley Fool fame that takes the politics out of the analysis. I immediately reached out to Scott and asked him could I re-post it for my readers who may be finding the debate confusing or hard to explain to others. So here goes:

Why Bill Shorten is wrong — and right — on dividends

Scott Phillips

What’s that? Bill Shorten has announced a new policy on the refund of franking credits?

I hadn’t noticed.

Okay, that’s not true. I noticed. And, based on feedback on Twitter over the last week, many of you noticed, too.

If Shorten wanted to stir a hornet’s nest, he got just that. Maybe it’s clever politics. Maybe the focus groups told the pollsters this was a smart political strategy.

It sure as heck isn’t good policy, in my view.

Before you fire off an email to either abuse me or suggest I be knighted, let me explain.

I’m going to start with three premises that I think most people can agree on:

The tax system should be fair
You shouldn’t have to pay tax twice on dividend income; and
The tax system, as it stands, is broken.

That last point seems to be Shorten’s main thrust. And it’s a battle cry taken up by many partisans:

“We have a problem, and I have a solution. If you don’t like my solution, you’re saying we don’t have a problem.”

To which I reply:

“We absolutely have a problem. But your solution is a poor one. There are better ways to skin this cat.”

And before we go any further, please leave your political affiliations at the door. This week, on Twitter, I have bagged and praised Labor for different policies. I’ve done the same in the past to the Libs. If you can’t put aside your team jersey and engage in a discussion of ideas, then there’s not much for you in what follows.

But if you’re interested in good policy, read on.

Bill Shorten’s policy, as announced, goes something like this:

“We’re happy for you to reduce your tax using franking credits, but we’re not going to give you a refund.”

There are a few problems with that approach:

First, it implies that if you pay tax, you’re welcome to use the credits to reduce your tax burden to zero.

Second, those credits somehow magically are worthless once you hit zero, meaning that to me they’re worth something, but to a retiree in a 0% tax bracket, they’re worth nothing.

How can franking credits be worth different amounts to different people in different circumstances? Search me… I’m buggered if I know.

And third, and this is what’s stirred up most heat among those who have gone into bat for the policy:

“I pay tax and my taxes shouldn’t go to give a refund/handout to people who already have a lot of money.”

Now, don’t get me wrong. I think the current situation — regarding the ability to pay exactly zero tax on certain income in retirement that might be up to $80,000 — is crackers.

But, Shorten’s policy doesn’t fix that problem. Here’s why:

Consider three people, all of whom have SMSFs in pension phase, and who — according to the current tax rules — pay 0% tax: Banking Betty, Rental Richard and Dividend Davina.

Banking Betty deposits $100,000, and earns $2,000 each year in interest. Betty doesn’t pay any tax.
Rental Richard has a $100,000 property that pays him $2,000 each year in rent. Richard doesn’t pay any tax.
Dividend Davina buys $100,000 worth of shares that earned a profit of $2,000. The company paid tax of $600, so Davina gets $1,400. Davina doesn’t pay any tax.

See the difference here? Because Davina’s investment is in the form of shares in a company, she gets less than the other two. Even though she’s not supposed to pay any tax, the company paid tax, so she gets less.

Under current rules, she’d get the $600 back, delivering on the current government policy of a 0% tax rate, and equalising the return for each of those investors.

Bill Shorten, in effect, is penalising people for owning shares.

Now, let’s address the elephant in the room. Yes, because the company has already paid tax on that $2,000, Davina does officially get a refund. And the optics of that are bad: it looks like somehow the taxpayer is subsidising Davina.

But it’s all a question of cash flows and timing. The ATO just gives Davina back the money the company paid in tax.

And remember, a company is just a legal structure to organise your ownership interest in an asset. Shares in a company aren’t all that different in effect to accounts at a bank. Your bank account is evidence that you have a claim to a share of that bank’s assets, even if you don’t know specifically which notes you deposited.

Imagine a scenario under which Banking Betty’s bank withholds 30% of her interest and sends it to the government as tax. And where Rental Richard’s property manager is obligated to send 30% of his rental income to the ATO.

Both of these investors would have to fill out a tax return and the ATO would send them a refund — because tax was paid on their income, even though the tax rate should have been 0%.

Would Bill Shorten stop Betty and Richard getting their money back?

I doubt it.

But somehow, because Labor has (unfortunately, disingenuously) used extreme examples to make their point, and because they’ve dressed it up as a handout, they’ve mischaracterised the situation.

Somehow Dividend Davina is a fatcat living high on the hog, while Betty and Richard are perfectly entitled to pay no tax.

Essentially, because of the asset class they decide to invest in, our three protagonists are being treated differently.

Sound fair to you?

No, me neither.

Yes, the idea of a ‘refund’ for someone who has paid no tax feels, somehow, deeply wrong. But it’s because tax was paid by the company, on behalf of a shareholder who shouldn’t be paying tax, so the ATO is essentially just righting that wrong.

Still with me? Excellent!

Still fuming that well-off people pay no tax? Me too.

What? Didn’t I just spend 984 words (don’t waste time counting them. I checked) defending those people?

Well, yes. And no.

Here’s where both parties are engaging in a phony war of words. And we’re poorer for it.

Having an essentially uncapped income at a 0% tax rate is madness.

Yes, yes, it’s not technically uncapped, for a host of reasons. So let’s say $80,000 among friends.

You and I pay a decent slug of tax on an $80,000 income. And there’s no reason that a well-off retiree should be able to draw a completely untaxed income of a similar amount, when they likely have a very decent asset base — say a home and a seven-figure superannuation balance.

It’s simply not sustainable, especially as more boomers retire, to have that slice of the economic income pie remain completely untaxed.

But — and this is important — that doesn’t mean we should simply ban franking credit refunds and assume that fixes the problem.

Let’s go back to our alliterative actors, Betty, Richard and Davina.

If Betty was earning $80,000 in interest, should that be untaxed? Should Richard’s $80,000 in rent be untouched by the taxman? Should Davina’s $80,000 in dividends remain completely unscathed?

I don’t think so. But again, it’s not a question of the source of the income; it’s the size.

Under Bill Shorten’s plan, Davina would be worse off, but Betty and Richard laugh all the way to the bank. Does anyone, seriously, think that’s a good basis for a tax plan?

I didn’t think so.

Here’s what I’d do: I’d have a generous tax-free threshold for income from superannuation, maybe $10,000 or so above the pension level. It’s not unreasonable that you’re allowed a little extra, given the sacrifice you made to save for your retirement.

But above that level, I’d implement a progressive tax scale not unlike the one that applies to regular income: The more you earn, the higher your marginal tax rate.

Simple, no?

Fair, yes?

That way, the tax code doesn’t discriminate on the basis of the asset class. There are no free lunches. And the unsustainable tax situation that currently applies to Super is fixed.

So Bill Shorten, and Chris Bowen, it’s time to admit defeat and go back to the drawing board. Feel free to use my template, above.

And Scott Morrison and Malcolm Turnbull, please stop with the emotive and negative language and grandstanding.

Politics should be a battle of ideas, not soundbites The best idea, well explained, should win, regardless of political party or ideological affiliation.

And, ladies and gentlemen of the Parliament, the Australian people will give you bonus points for explaining it clearly and for anything that reduces the complexity of our tax affairs, while ensuring fairness.

Indeed, Turnbull and Morrison’s political forebear, John Howard spoke to the National Press Club in 2014 when he shared the stage with former Labor PM, Bob Hawke. At that event, according to the Sydney Morning Herald , Howard said

“We have sometimes lost the capacity to respect the ability of the Australian people to absorb a detailed argument. They will respond to an argument for change and reform [but] they want two requirements. They want to be satisfied it’s in the national interest, because they have a deep sense of nationalism and patriotism. They also want to be satisfied it’s fundamentally fair.”

I’d like to think that’s still true.

I agree with Bill Shorten’s characterisation of the problem. I disagree completely with his solution.

I imagine I lost the most partisan readers — of both stripes — a few minutes ago. If you’re still reading, thank you for engaging in a discussion of ideas.

I hope I’ve convinced some of you. Of those I haven’t convinced, I hope I’ve at least done a decent job of addressing the issue, without bias, grandstanding or misdirection. Thanks for reading.

At the very least, I hope I’ve productively added to the conversation. It’s the least each of us can do.

Fool on! Scott is @TMFScottP on Twitter and can be found here on The Motley Fool

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

5 Comments

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on March 18, 2018 • Permalink

Posted in Franking Credits, Investor Education, Pensions, Tax Planning

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on March 18, 2018

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2018/03/18/best-apolitical-analysis-of-franking-credit-refund-removal-debate/

SMSF Corporate Trustee Structure Finally Outnumbering Individual Trustees.

For the last decade every time I saw the SMSF statistical results issued by the ATO I was dismayed by the number of new SMSF funds being set up with Individual Trustees, often well over 80% each year. I assumed this was people setting up self managed superannuation funds without good advice or reasonable research.

So I was delighted to see the latest stats provided by the ATO for 2015-16 but including some 2016-17 data which has seen a complete turnaround with over 80% of new SMSFs being set up with Corporate Trustees and the overall numbers on existing funds turning in favour of using a company.

SMSF trustee structure

At 30 June 2017, 57% of all SMSFs had a corporate trustee rather than individual trustees.
Of newly registered SMSFs in 2015 to 2017, on average 81% were established with a corporate trustee.

A few times over the last 5 years I have run polls asking professionals in the SMSF industry whether they would recommend individual or corporate trustees. Every time the overwhelming result is in favour of Corporate Trustees.

So over 90% of professionals who deal day in day out with SMSF issues and like myself deal with some of the fallout when approached by grieving widows(ers), recommend a Corporate trustee for an SMSF.

Costs

Costs should not be a deterrent as a sole Purpose Trustee company only costs about $600-$880 to set up and the ASIC review fee is only $48 per year and you can lock that in and get a discount for up to 10 years. See here for more detail on that discount.

I have set out my arguments for a Corporate Trustee in this previous article Why Self Managed Super Funds Should Have A Corporate Trustee. If you are considering an SMSF the I would encourage you to read through that article and feel free to pass it on to your friends, family or advisors.

Finally if you are considering trying to save some costs by using the same company as your Business or Family Discretionary Trust then I would recommend you read this article first: Trading Company as SMSF Trustee or Sole Purpose SMSF Trustee Company?

Are you looking for an advisor that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? Then why now contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

Leave a comment

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on January 23, 2018 • Permalink

Posted in News & Stats, SMSF Management, Trustee

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on January 23, 2018

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2018/01/23/smsf-corporate-trustee-structure-finally-outnumbering-individual-trustees/

Introducing our new Financial Knowledge Centre – for DIY Research

At SMSF Coach and our Financial Planning arm Verante, we believe in your financial wellbeing and improving your understanding of financial concepts.

We understand that the financial industry is full of jargon and concepts that can be difficult for people to get their head around or remember.

So to learn more about money and finance, our Financial Knowledge Centre is a great place to start.

It contains a huge library of articles, life events, videos, quiz’s and calculators, so that you can learn about managing money while having a bit of fun at the same time.

The best part of all is that you work at your own pace and we offer a free trial to one and all but it will always be free to our clients as part of our advice service.

Watch this short video which explains what is available in this vast knowledge base.

Visit The Financial Knowledge Centre and try it out FREE for a month

No Credit Card required.

It includes a whole module on SMSF education and

Self-Managed Super Funds section includes:

–	SMSF Overview
	What is an SMSF?
+	The Decision Making Process
+	The Costs of running an SMSF
+	Setting up an SMSF
+	Appointing trustees
+	Individual Trustee vs. Corporate Trustee
+	Ongoing Administration
+	Accepting Rollovers and Contributions
+	Investment decisions and rules
+	Insurance Considerations
+	Tax Considerations for SMSFs
+	Paying Benefits from an SMSF
+	Death of an SMSF member
+	Estate Planning
+	Getting more help
+	Closing a SMSF
+	Federal Budget 2017/18 Proposals
+	SMSF Summary

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

Leave a comment

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on January 18, 2018 • Permalink

Posted in education, Financial Planning, Insurance Strategies, News & Stats, Retirement Planning, SMSF Management

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on January 18, 2018

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2018/01/18/introducing-our-new-financial-knowledge-centre-for-diy-research/

Do you have an SMSF Trust Deed that is Signed and Dated

Ok this may seem like a boring question but have you actually checked if you have a copy of your latest SMSF deed on file or that your accountant and financial adviser have one of file? Has it been dated properly and signed and witnessed properly by all parties.

In this era of everyone rushing around and having busy lives, it’s the little things that get missed and that can cause a huge problem later. An unsigned or undated deed may result in your fund being found non-compliant and unable to function or leave major headaches for your beneficiaries. If you are a professional adviser then those disgruntled parties will be looking for someone still alive to blame and pick up the costs.

An SMSF trust deed is a legal document that sets out the rules for establishing and operating your fund. It includes such things as the fund’s objectives, what the fund can invest in, who can be a member and whether benefits can be paid as a lump sum or income stream. The trust deed and super laws together form the fund’s governing rules.

The trust deed must be:

prepared by someone qualified to do so – it’s a legal document
signed and dated by all trustees
properly executed according to state or territory laws
regularly reviewed, and updated as necessary.

I take over management of a lot of funds and we are seeing many cases where the original trust deed was signed correctly and dated but a subsequent update or deed of amendment is sitting on the file unsigned or undated.

It is illegal to sign and backdate documents. As the Trustee of your fund it is your responsibility to ensure that deeds are legally compliant, signed and up to date.

If you are an Accountant, Administrator, Financial Planner or Auditor then you may share in the responsibility to ensure that deeds are compliant and properly completed. Your client may love you but their beneficiaries may come looking for someone to blame if an unsigned deed means a compliance breach with heavy tax or administrative penalties.

So what should you do.

See if you have a SMSF deed in your files and check if it is properly signed, witnessed and dated.
If you don’t have a copy then email your accountant and financial adviser and ask then to confirm if they have a signed and dated original copy on file. If they do then ask for a Certified Copy.
If in checking you see that the deed is dated pre-2012 then ask your Administrator or Accountant if it has been updated and read my previous blog 15 Reasons to update your SMSF Deed for new strategies in 2017
If it has been updated with a Deed of Amendment, has that been signed and dated? Get a copy of all Deeds of Amendment for your records so you can show the full history of your fund. Keep a copy yourself in case you fall out with your professional advisers.

Don’t be the one who leaves a mess behind!

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

2 Comments

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on December 7, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in Audit, Deeds, SMSF Management, Trustee

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on December 7, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/12/07/do-you-have-an-smsf-trust-deed-that-is-signed-and-dated/

Vanguard Diversified ETFs – A Game Changer for SMSF Portfolio Design

When I talk to self-directed SMSF trustees their excuse for not diversifying more from Aussie Shares and Term Deposits was that it was difficult to understand some sectors and to get a decent diversification without building a huge portfolio of stocks, unlisted managed funds, bonds, hybrids etc. They hated application forms especially for SMSF investments but they have been reluctant to use a platform despite my argument that often a platform was a useful vehicle. Most just are not interested in another layer of fees for their SMSF. Each to their own so I left the argument there. However now the mountain is coming to them!

The following is general information and not a recommendation, you still need to do your own research or get advice for your personal circumstances.

In November 2017 Vanguard Australia finally launched a suite of four exchange traded funds (ETFs) that provide greater access to their leading diversified portfolio strategies. This will make SMSF and personal investing a far more accessible and transparent option for many and ultimately help them achieve their financial goals at a lower cost, easier reporting and with less paperwork than currently. They offer a great opportunity to develop a well simple, market leading diversified core to your portfolio.

The four Vanguard Diversified Index ETFs build on their extensive suite of ETFs and unlisted Managed Funds, and are one of the first ETFs allowing investors to gain diversification across and within all major asset classes, while making a clear choice about how much risk they take on. I would argue that AMP’s DMKT and Schroder’s GROW do this to some extent but not at this low a cost as they are actively managed an many might think they are a good blend with Vanguard’s new range.

The conservative (VDCO), balanced (VDBA), growth (VDGR) and high growth (VDHG) ETFs offer investors simple, single trade access to Vanguard’s global expertise in portfolio management and asset allocation, with annual investment costs at just 0.27 per cent. Yes that’s only $2.70 management fee for every $1000 invested in a diversified portfolio, wipe the floor of many industry and retail super funds.

Each Diversified Index ETF is a share class of an existing Vanguard Diversified Index Fund, meaning ETF investors can tap into the benefits of an established asset pool, collectively worth more than $7 billion, through Vanguard’s existing range of non-listed multi-asset funds. Vanguard’s Diversified Index Funds consistently rank in the top quartile of performance with their peers over three, five and 10 year periods, according to Morningstar.

Yes you are giving up some transparency and control but I believe you can rely on Vanguard’s investment experts to continuously assess their portfolio’s exposure and periodically rebalance it back to its intended level of risk.”

Each Vanguard Diversified Index ETF provides investors with extensive global exposure to around 6500 individual companies and more than 5000 fixed income securities.

Just in case you have not heard of Vanguard, here is a little detail to help build a picture of their strength and reach:

The Vanguard Group, Inc.: Key facts and figures*

Founded	1975
Total assets under management	AUD $5.9 trillion
Funds offered	180 in the US, and 190 funds in markets outside the US
Ownership	The Vanguard Group, Inc. is owned by its US-domiciled funds, which are owned by their shareholders.
Headquarters	Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, USA
Chairman and CEO	F. William McNabb III
Number of employees	About 15,000 worldwide

Vanguard’s Investment Strategy Group, a global team of researchers and analysts, set the asset allocation of the diversified funds as part of a robust framework used by Vanguard globally. This framework includes analysis of concentration risk and currency exposure, and incorporates comprehensive modelling generated by Vanguard’s proprietary forecasting engine, the Vanguard Capital Markets Model.

Full details about Vanguard’s new Diversified Index ETFs can be found at www.vanguard.com.au/diversifiedETFs.

Please consider passing on this article to family or friends. Pay it forward!

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

3 Comments

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on November 24, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in Asset Allocation, International Investing, Investment Strategies, Investor Education, SMSF

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on November 24, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/11/24/vanguard-diversified-etfs-a-game-changer-for-smsf-portfolio-design/

SMSF Research – BITCOIN, DOLLARS, GOLD: What Is the Future of Money?

I am being inundated by queries from young men aged 20-40 looking to learn more about Bitcoin and then a cohort of traditional SMSF trustees aged 40-70 who have an interest in alternative investments and especially Gold who now want to at least know more about Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in general. so when I came across this latest paper dealing with both subjects from my good mate Jordan Eliseo, Chief Economist at ABC Bullion I twisted his arm to let me share it to my readers.

The key finding of his paper are:

KEY FINDINGS

Blockchain technology has serious real world applications – it is here to stay
Given valuations in broader financial markets, it can make sense to speculate in the cryptocurrency market with a small portion of one’s wealth
Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are money today, but whether that status will endure remains to be seen
Physical gold remains the simplest and most effective hedge against the monetary, market, and macroeconomic risks that investors confront today

I recommend that you read Jordan’s full report here:

BITCOIN, DOLLARS, GOLD: What Is the Future of Money?

Now, if you are determined to go ahead and invest in Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies then you need to do some serious groundwork.

NOTE: I DO NOT RECOMMEND CRYPTO CURRENCIES AS A SUITABLE INVESTMENT FOR AN SMSF, I AM JUST MAKING SURE THAT THOSE WHO DO INVEST DO IT COMPLIANTLY

How the SMSF regulations affect investing in Bitcoin, Ethereum or other cryptocurrencies

SMSF Professionals and Trustees should be well aware of the restrictions placed on the investment choices of SMSFs by the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and supporting regulations. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is in charge of the administration of these rules and they have issued this guidance on their website:

Tax treatment of crypto-currencies in Australia – specifically bitcoin

Although there are not yet any formal rulings from the ATO clarifying how the rules apply to Bitcoin, there are a number of Tax Determinations that help guide any SMSF Trustees considering investing in bitcoins.

TD 2014/25 Income tax: is bitcoin a ‘foreign currency’ for the purposes of Division 775 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)
TD 2014/26 Income tax: is bitcoin a CGT asset for the purposes of subsection 108-5(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)
TD 2014/27 Income tax: is bitcoin trading stock for the purposes of subsection 70-10(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)
GSTR 2014/3 Goods and services tax: the GST implications of transactions involving bitcoin.

Considerations before investing in Bitcoin:

Is it right for your needs and objectives? Consider if an investment in Bitcoin would satisfy the ‘sole purpose test’? – Are you honestly investing in it for your retirement?
In your circumstances does Bitcoin investing suit your risk tolerance (and the other member’s of your SMSF) and have you done enough research to validate your investment decision,
Does you Trust Deed allow for investing in bitcoins or cryptocurrencies. Read your deed and maybe ask the trust deed provider.
Talk to your fund’s auditor before proceeding as they have to sign off on the investment’s validity annually so better to run the strategy by them upfront.

They may ask you to verify the following:

If you wish to proceed with a purchase then have you amended your SMSF’s investment strategy to cater for this investment? Click the link for more details.
Trap: Make sure you know who is in ‘control’ the bitcoins? All assets must be clearly in the name/control of the trustees of the fund
How would the SMSF acquire the bitcoins? Do not acquire them from yourself or a “related party”
How secure is the exchange/wallet you are storing your cryptocurrencies in. Some have been hacked and coins lost.

No matter what it is essential to do you research and not take a gamble with your retirement nest egg unless you have covered all your bases.

Audit Tip:

Auditors and trustees can have access to the single public ledger that records Bitcoin. Websites such as Blockchain, BlockExplorer and Blockonomics allow input of a transaction ID to get detailed data of that Bitcoin transaction. Third party verification for auditors is therefore also possible. You can obtain a transaction list from the SMSF wallet provider and verify each holding. I am sure further tools will become available.

Here is another article worth reading as part of your research:

Bubbles, busts, investor psychology…and bitcoin by Shane Oliver

Looking for an adviser that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? Then why now contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options. Do it! make 2016 the year to get organised or it will be 2026 before you know it.

Please consider passing on this article to family or friends. Pay it forward!

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

2 Comments

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on November 21, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in Asset Allocation, Botcoin, International Investing, Investment Strategies, SMSF Management, Trustee

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on November 21, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/11/21/smsf-research-bitcoin-dollars-gold-what-is-the-future-of-money%ef%bb%bf/

Guide to Transfer Balance Account Reporting (TBAR) for SMSF Trustees – Updated for $1m carve out

UPDATE

ATO approve $1 million threshold carve out
SMSFs that have no members with a total superannuation balance (TSB) of $1 million or more will be able to report TBC transactions annually in line with current processes. This is a permanent carve-out for all SMSFs which meet this condition. The ATO have agreed with our position that individuals who are no risk of breaching the $1.6 million TBC should not be forced into a regular reporting framework. See here for more detail from ATO

I am getting many questions about the workings of the Transfer Balance Account Report (TBAR), Transfer Balance Cap (TBC) and Total Super Balance (TSB). So, in this 3-part series I will explain each one for you starting with your Transfer Balance Account Report. Most of this material is sourced from various ATO webpages and collated here for your guidance with my commentary.

So what is in your transfer balance account (TBA)?

There has always been a problem with the data available to the ATO in terms of how much people have in different phases of superannuation throughout the year with the ATO often having to wait until a few months after the end of the year for APRA fund reporting and nearly 11 months for SMSF data to flow through.

The transfer balance account is a new method designed by the ATO of tracking transactions and amounts in retirement phase. The balance of your transfer balance account determines whether you have space under your cap or if you have exceeded your transfer balance cap at the end of any given day. The transfer balance cap is a limit on the amount you can hold in retirement phase ($1.6 million in 2017–18).

You will start to have a transfer balance account on:

1 July 2017, if you are already receiving a retirement phase income stream at the end of 30 June 2017, or
the day you first commence receiving a retirement phase income stream.

It is important to understand that this TBA includes information from all your superannuation pension accounts via SMSF, Retail, Employer, Industry funds, annuity providers and other funds. It is on a consolidated basis and not per account.

All super providers, including self-managed super funds (SMSFs) and life insurance companies, with members in retirement phase will be required to complete and lodge this report to the ATO. The ATO will collate the data under your TFN and make available your consolidated Transfer Balance Account to you and your advisers.

Your transfer balance account measures your transfer balance, which is the sum of credits less the sum of debits posted to the account.

Now if you are like me then you tend to get totally confused when it comes to what is a debit and what is a credit so let’s take a refresher

My short code is “C+ and D-“ Credit = an addition to your total balance and Debit = a lowering of your total balance

It might be good to clear up some confusion by stating upfront that these events are not reportable.

Events that do not need to be reported include:

pension payments
investment earnings and losses
when an income stream is closed because the interest has been exhausted.

These are Credits to your account

Credits to your transfer balance account increase your transfer balance and reduce your available cap space. The most common transfer balance credit arises when you begin receiving a super income stream (pension) that is in the retirement phase.

The following amounts are credits to your account:

the total value of any super interests that support retirement phase income streams you are receiving on 30 June 2017
the value of new retirement phase income streams, including super death benefit income streams and deferred super income streams, that you begin to receive on or after 1 July 2017
the value of reversionary super income streams at the time you become entitled to them (although the timing of the credit may differ in certain circumstances)
the excess transfer balance earnings that accrue on any excess transfer balance amount you have.

For a capped defined benefit income stream, the credits above are calculated on the special value of the income stream.

The Treasury Laws Amendment (2017 Measures No.2) Bill 2017 provides for an additional credit where a super fund makes a payment towards a limited recourse borrowing arrangement. This payment increases the value of retirement phase interests.

The value of your super interests will be calculated by your super fund(s) accountant or administrator and notified to the ATO.

These are Debits to your account

Debits to your transfer balance account may:

reduce your excess transfer balance, and/or
increase your available cap space.

Events that cause your account to be debited include commutations, structured settlement contributions, and certain other events that cause a change in the value of your retirement phase interests.

Commutations

When a super income stream is fully or partially commuted, your transfer balance account is debited by the value commuted. The debit arises when you receive the lump sum, and applies whether you choose to transfer the lump sum to an accumulation account or withdraw it from super.

You must commute an income stream before you can roll it over to another fund.

Pension payments from your retirement phase account(s) are not commutations and are not debited from your transfer balance account.

Structured settlement contributions

A debit arises for a structured settlement that you receive (as payment for a personal injury you have suffered) and contribute towards your accumulation or retirement phase super interests.

Events resulting in a reduction of your super interest

You may be entitled to a debit in your transfer balance account if you lose some or all of the value of your super interests through events such as fraud, dishonesty, or void transactions under the Bankruptcy Act 1966.

Commutation authorities

The ATO may issue a commutation authority to super providers where a member has exceeded their transfer balance cap. A commutation authority will detail the amount that must be commuted for that member.

Payment split upon divorce or relationship breakdown

Super interests may be split as part of the division of property following a divorce or relationship breakdown. One party (the member spouse) will be required to provide a proportion of their retirement phase super interest(s) to the other party (the non-member spouse).

For either spouse, the debit arises either when the payment split becomes operative (under the Family Law Act 1975) or when they start to have a transfer balance account (whichever is later).

Failure to comply with pension or annuity standards

If your super fund fails to comply with the rules or standards for your income stream, that income stream may cease to meet the definition of a ‘superannuation income stream’. This means it will no longer be eligible for the earnings tax exemption.

The most common situation is where the super fund fails to pay the minimum pension amount required for a financial year under the regulatory rules. If this occurs, for transfer balance cap purposes, the income stream is taken to have stopped meeting the definition at the end of that financial year.

The debit equals the value of your income stream just before it stops meeting the definition. The debit arises in your transfer balance account when the income stream stops meeting the definition. This debit means you will be able to fully commute the income stream, and start a new one that complies with the pension or annuity standards, without breaching your transfer balance cap.

Self-managed super fund (SMSF) reporting

The ATO recognises that this is a major change for SMSFs so as a transitional concession, SMSFs will generally not need to commence reporting using the TBAR until 1 July 2018. The ATO is still currently consulting with industry on the model of event based reporting to apply from 1 July 2018.

TBAR lodgment is available from 1 October 2017 and submitted forms will be accepted from that time onwards if the choice is made to lodge earlier.

You should be talking to your Advisers, Accountants or Administrators to see how they plan to manage your reporting. If you have only been seeing them once a year then you may need to work out a solution for a quarterly update if you are in or near pension phase. You will need your various advisers to work as a team going forward to avoid late reporting. See Are your accountant, lawyer and financial planner working as a team for your benefit?

Although SMSFs with a member balance of over $1,000,000 will not generally need to commence TBAR reporting until 1 July 2018, SMSFs will need to ensure they have appropriately documented income stream valuations and decisions for the 2017-18 year. Until reporting begins, SMSF members must monitor the value of retirement income streams they receive to ensure they will not be in excess of the transfer balance cap from 1 July 2017 onwards.

The general exception to starting to report on 1 July 2018 does not apply:

if the ATO have issued an Excess Transfer Balance (ETB) Determination to a member because they have exceeded their cap and they choose to commute an income stream in their SMSF. Where this applies, the SMSF must report the commutation within 10 business days after the end of the month in which it occurred to avoid a commutation authority being issued. If the member chooses to commute an income stream the SMSF has not yet reported it to the ATO, the SMSF will also need to report the commencement date and value of the relevant income stream at the same time as a separate event
when a commutation authority is issued to an SMSF. The SMSF must abide by legislated reporting requirements. Refer to commutation authorities for more information.

To avoid the incorrect issue of an ETB Determination to a member, you are encouraged to report the following events as soon as possible if they occur before 1 July 2018:

any debit where an SMSF member is commuting an income stream because they have become aware they have exceeded their transfer balance cap
any debit that occurs prior to a member rolling over some or all of their retirement phase income stream out of their SMSF and starting a new retirement phase pension or annuity with another provider
any structured settlement contributions made to the fund on or after 1 July 2017.

Consequences of late reporting

Once your reporting has commenced, lodge the TBAR with the ATO as soon as practicable after the event has occurred to ensure your member’s transfer balance account is updated.

If you do not lodge the report by the required date your member’s transfer balance account will be adversely affected and they may be penalised. You may also be subject to compliance action and penalties.

Source: See more detail and some examples at https://www.ato.gov.au/Individuals/Super/Super-changes/New-transfer-balance-cap-for-retirement-phase-accounts/New-transfer-balance-account—credits-and-debits/

And here

https://www.ato.gov.au/Super/Self-managed-super-funds/Administering-and-reporting/Superannuation-Transfer-Balance-Account-Report/

Want a Superannuation Review or are you just looking for an adviser that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? Then why now contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options. Do it! make this the year to get organised or it will be 2028 before you know it.

Please consider passing on this article to family or friends. Pay it forward!

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

3 Comments

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on November 1, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in Pension Strategies, Pensions, Retirement Planning, SMSF Management, TBAR reporting

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on November 1, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/11/01/guide-to-transfer-balance-account-reporting-tbar-for-smsf-trustees/

3 SMSF Estate Panning issues clarified in recent Binding Death Benefit Case

It always amazes me that very often when I take an SMSF under my advice that I find that the estate planning and use of Binding Death Benefit Nominations has been haphazard, lacking in essential detail, ignorant of the SMSF deed requirements or just missing. People spend their lives amazing a nestegg only to be lax in ensuring it goes to who they want when they die.

A recent decision has clarified three issues regarding the validity of binding death benefit nominations. I have relied on the following summary from Townsend Law’s Michael Hallinan for interpretation of the decision.

A recent decision of the South Australian Court of Appeal (Cantor Management Services Pty Ltd v Booth [2017]) has passed important comment on no less than three different issues regarding the validity of a binding death benefit nomination (BDBN).

The critical issue was whether a BDBN was valid. If valid, then the death benefit was payable to the estate of the deceased member. If invalid, then the trustee would decide the allocation of the benefit.

The validity turned upon the issue of whether the BDBN had been served on the corporate trustee. The BDBN had been signed by the member and then left in the possession of the accountants of the SMSF at their office which was also the registered office of the corporate trustee.

Issue No 1

The sole director of the corporate trustee had argued that as the BDBN had not been provided to the director nor had the accountants been expressly authorised to accept and hold the BDBN on behalf of the corporate trustee, then the BDBN had not been properly served on the corporate trustee.

The Court did not accept the argument put by the corporate trustee. The Chief Justice held that it was sufficient to constitute service on the corporate trustee for the BDBN to be held by the accountants of the SMSF at the registered office of the corporate trustee. The other justices agreed with the Chief Justice.

Issue No 2

The second issue was that the Court opined that the accountants had a duty to keep the BDBN safe and also had a duty to bring to the attention of the trustee of the SMSF that they held the BDBN. If the Court had held that service had not been properly effected, the defendant may have been able to sue the accountants for their negligence in failing to advise the trustee that they were holding the BDBN. Luckily for them the Court said that service was good anyway.

Issue No 3

The third issue was that Court agreed with the decision of Munro v Munro, which held that SIS regulation 6.17A does not apply to SMSFs (unless the trust deed of the SMSF explicitly or implicitly incorporates the regulation). It is surprising that a few industry die-hards still argue that reg 6.17A might still apply to SMSFs despite the number of times the courts have said otherwise.

The original article by Michael Hallinan of Townsends Business & Corporate Lawyers can be found here and you can contact them on (02) 8296 6222. I highly recommend signing up for their newsletter.

Make sure to check your with your own current death benefit arrangements or contact us for a review.

Please consider passing on this article to family or friends. Pay it forward!

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

Leave a comment

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on October 5, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in Binding Death Nominations, Estate Planning, SMSF Management, Trustee

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on October 5, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/10/05/3-smsf-estate-panning-issues-clarified-in-recent-binding-death-benefit-case/

Trust deeds in the new SMSF world – Benefit payments and estate planning

Your superannuation trust deed along with the superannuation laws form the governing rules that self managed super funds (SMSFs) needs to operate by. The introduction of the $1.6 million transfer balance cap (TBC) and new transition to retirement income stream (TRIS) rules are a ‘game changer’ for SMSFs when discussing benefit payments and estate planning. With the new super rules in effect as of 1 July 2017, now is the right time to review if your trust deed needs to be enhanced or amended to deal with the new approaches and strategies you may need to implement.

Read the deed

The first step in reviewing your superannuation trust deed will be to read it. Trust deeds are legal documents which can be complex to read, so you may want help from an advisor with this.

It is likely that most deeds will not result in a breach of any superannuation laws and would provide the trustee with powers to comply with relevant tax and superannuation laws as they change over time.

The next step would be to review the deed in consideration with your own circumstances.

For example, a common scenario may be a restrictive deed that only provides the trustee with a discretion to pay death benefits. Therefore, if a member of that SMSF wanted to create a binding death benefit nomination, it would be irrelevant due to the deed’s governing rules.

In any event, deeds which are clearly out of date will need to be amended as soon as possible.

Deeds post 1 July 2017

Post 1 July 2017, there are many approaches and strategies that will differ from the past and it is essential to ensure that your SMSF deed does not restrict you in anyway. We note the following areas should be considered:

Paying death benefits

The $1.6 million TBC now restricts the amount of money that can be kept in super on the death of a member. This is crucially important as when a member dies, their TBC dies with them. SMSF members should review their estate planning and further review their trust deed for the following:

Does it allow for binding death benefit nominations (BDBN)?
Do BDBNs lapse every 3 years in accordance with the trust deed when the legislation does not prescribe it?
Does it consider the appropriate solution when there is a conflict between a reversionary pension and a BDBN and which will take precedence?

Reversionary pensions

Reversionary pensions are pensions which continue being paid to a dependant after your death. Under the TBC, reversionary pensions will not count towards a member’s TBC until 12 months after the date of the original recipient’s death. Importantly, the transfer of the pension from the deceased to the new recipient will count towards the TBC. The value of the credit to the TBC will be the value of the pension at the date of death, not the value after 12 months. This increases the complexity of reversionary pensions prompting a review of trust deeds to consider:

Does it allow for a reversionary pension to be added to an existing pension or are there restrictions?
Should it automatically ensure that a pension is reversionary so that it is paid to a surviving spouse?

Pensions

The TBC also has implications for strategies in commencing pensions and making benefit payments. Trust deeds may need to be reviewed for:

Ensuring that commutations are able to be moved into accumulation phase rather than being forced as lump sums out of superannuation.
Are there any specific provisions relating to the TBC? There may be value in ensuring that the deed restricts pensions from being commenced with a value greater than the TBC.
Are there provisions which detail where commutations must be sourced from first?
Are there restrictive pension provisions that the trustees must comply with?

Transition to retirement income streams

Tax concessions for TRISs where the recipient does not have unrestricted access to their superannuation savings (known as meeting a condition of release with a nil chasing restriction) have also been removed. Trust deeds may need to be reviewed for:

Does the deed allow for the 10% maximum benefit payment to fall away once a nil condition of release is met?
Does the deed deal with a TRIS’s character when a nil condition of release? (Does it convert into an account based pension?)

How can we help?

SMSF Specialist Advisors can help you understand how the new laws may impact you and partner with a lawyer/Deed provider to review and amend your trust deed as required. Please feel free to give me a call to arrange a time to meet so that we can discuss your particular requirements, especially in regards to issues that may arise out of the latest super laws, in more detail.

For further educational information please subscribe to this blog and also visit the SMSF Association’s Trustee Knowledge Centre (http://trustees.smsfassociation.com/) to keep on top of the latest changes and information to reach your retirement goals and get the most out of your self managed super fund.

Please consider passing on this article to family or friends. Pay it forward!

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

Leave a comment

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on September 29, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in Estate Planning, SMSF Management, Trustee

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on September 29, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/09/29/trust-deeds-in-the-new-smsf-world-benefit-payments-and-estate-planning/

Don’t Rush in to Downsizing Your Home

I love working on strategies for clients but sometimes you just need a true expert or excellent software to crunch the numbers. I was looking for some ideas on downsizing as it had become clear to me that is was not the panacea to retirement funding that client’s often believe it would be. So I was looking for an in-depth article working through the numbers and Rob van Dalen of Optimo Financial has kindly stepped up to provide the required analysis in our latest guest blog. Rob’s main warning is to do your sums on your own particular situation before leaping in to a downsizing strategy.

Rob van Dalen | General Manager

T 02 8622 2296
rvandalen@optimofinancial.com.au | www.optimofinancial.com.au

Optimo Financial
Suite 204, 10-12 Clarke Street, Crows Nest NSW 2065
PO Box 931, Crows Nest NSW 1585

Do Your Sums Before Downsizing

A popular subject often talked about at family barbecues is; “should mum and dad downsize when they get older?” Often it’s assumed that downsizing is the best option moving forward. To test and possibly challenge this we decided to run a few scenarios through our Pathfinder Financial Optimisation Platform to find out. Read our findings below;

1.1 The Clients

In this example, we look at the case of David and Alice who have recently retired and who will soon both be eligible for the age pension. David was born on 11 April 1953 while Alice was born on 15 November 1952. They have a modest $400,000 in super. Their other assets are the family home valued at $900,000 and personal assets valued at $40,000. They have no debt. They would like to have $50,000pa (increasing at CPI) for living expenses. They are worried that their super is not sufficient to maintain their desired income. Consequently, they have contemplated selling the family home and moving to a cheaper area where they could buy a new home for $500,000. Will downsizing leave them better off?

1.2 Assumptions

We have assumed in the analysis:

· Pension fund returns 5.7%pa;

· House selling costs 2.5%;

· House purchase costs 6% (including stamp duty);

· House prices in the long term increase at 3%pa;

· CPI 2.5%p.a.

1.3 Scenario 1: Retain Current Home

We first examine the scenario where David and Alice retain their current home. In this case, they will receive income from the government pension as well as drawing a pension from their own super. Figure 1 shows the sources of their income over a 20 year period.

David and Alice receive approximately 64% of their income from the age pension and associated benefits (see also Figure 6 below). The remainder is withdrawn from their pension account through withdrawing the minimum amount each year (plus some extra for the first few years until they become eligible for the age pension).

Their age pensions are limited approximately equally by the income and assets tests. After 20 years, David and Alice have a combined wealth of $1,960,000 most of which is from the family home.

1.4 Scenario 2: Downsizing Family Home in 2016/17

The next scenario sees David and Alice downsizing their family home from $900,000 to $500,000 in 2016/17. Their ages enable them to deposit the excess funds generated from the house sale into super as non-concessional contributions. However, a Pathfinder® analysis shows that increasing their superannuation balance reduces their age pension because, unlike the family home, super counts towards the age pension assets test and is deemed for the income test. Figure 2 shows the results of the age pension assets and income tests for David and Alice and we can see that their pension is now limited by the assets test. For a home owning couple, the age pension reduces at a rate of $3 per fortnight for each $1,000 of assets in excess of $575,000. This taper rate was doubled from 1 January 2017, so now has a much larger impact on the pension received.

So in 2019/20, for example, their age pension reduces from $36,337 to $9,004 and they must draw more from their pension account to make up the difference. Their wealth after 20 years is now projected at $1,581,000 or about $379,000 less than in the first scenario.

1.5 Scenario 3: Downsizing Family Home in 2027/28

In the third scenario, we examine the possibility that David and Alice defer the downsizing for ten years, say in 2027/28. Their age pension is initially unaffected until they downsize the family home, but after that time their age pension payments are severely curtailed. Their projected wealth after 20 years is now $1,714,000. This is a better outcome than in the second scenario but is still $246,000 less than if they keep their existing home.

1.6 Comparing the Scenarios

Figure 3 gives a comparison of the annual age pension received in the three scenarios. You can see that the scenario where they retain their current home, yields a higher pension and that their pension drops sharply after the sale of their house in the other two scenarios.

Figure 4 shows the total age pension payments over the 20 years. You can see that by keeping their original family home, their total pension entitlement is significantly higher than either of the downsizing options we analysed.

Figure 5 shows the total wealth over the 20 year period analysed.

The first point to note is the importance of the age pension towards retirement income, depending, of course, on the particular circumstances. Figure 6 shows the composition of retirement income over the 20 years analysed for Scenario 1.

1.7 Conclusions

In this example, the age pension plus estimated concession card benefits contribute about 64% to income while the account based pensions contribute about 36%. The second point is that downsizing the family home may not result in improving the overall situation as an increase in payments from a private pension may be more or less offset by a decrease in the age pension.

1.8 Pathfinder Learnings

In our Pathfinder® analysis, we find, perhaps surprisingly, that a couple could be considerably worse off by downsizing the family home. Any funds added to super by the income generated from downsizing could be dissipated by a reduction in the age pension. In addition, the costs of sale and repurchase of a family home are significant.

The age pension can provide a buffer between retirement savings and lifestyle expenses.

For persons eligible for the age pension, downsizing the family home may leave you worse off financially because of the impact of the age pension income and assets test.

Thank you Robby

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

2 Comments

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on September 12, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in Centrelink, Contribution Strategies, Downsizing, Pension Strategies, Property, Retirement Planning

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on September 12, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/09/12/dont-rush-in-to-downsizing-your-home/

How the Centrelink Gifting rules work

There are many rumours and well-intentioned but wrong advice out here on the internet about how to maximise Centrelink or DVA pension by “gifting assets” before applying. I want to clear up some of those misunderstandings

The gifting and deprivation rules prevent you from giving away assets or income over a certain level in order to increase age pension and allowance entitlements. For Centrelink and Department of Veteran’s Affairs (DVA) purposes, gifts made in excess of certain amounts are treated as an asset and subject to the deeming provisions for a period of 5 years from disposal.

Acknowledgement: I have relied on the excellent guidance of the AMP TAPin team for the majority of the content in this article. They write great technical articles for advisors and I try and make them SMSF trustee friendly.

What is considered a gift for Centrelink purposes?

For deprivation provisions to apply, it must be shown that a person has destroyed or diminished the value of an asset, income or a source of income.

A person disposes of an asset or income when they:
− engage in a course of conduct that destroys, disposes of or diminishes the value of their assets or income, and
− do not receive adequate financial consideration in exchange for the asset or income.

Adequate financial consideration can be accepted when the amount received reasonably equates to the market value of the asset. It may be necessary to obtain an independent market valuation to support your estimated value or transferred value or Centrelink may use their own resources to do so..

Deprivation also applies where the asset gifted does not actually count under the assets test. For example, unless the ‘granny flat’ provisions apply, deprivation is assessed if a person does not receive adequate financial consideration when they:

− transfer the legal title of their principal home to another person, or
− buy a new principal home in another person’s name.

What are the gifting limits?

The gifting rules do not prevent a person from making a gift to another person. Rather, they cap the amount by which a gift will reduce a person’s assessable income and assets, thereby increasing social security entitlements.

There are two gifting limits.

A person or a couple can dispose of assets of up to $10 000 each financial year. This $10, 000 limit applies to a single person or to the combined amounts gifted by a couple, and
An additional disposal limit of $30 000 over a five financial years rolling period.

The $10,000 and $30,000 limits apply together. That is, although people can continue to gift assets of up to $10 000 per financial year without penalty, they need to take care not to exceed the gifting free limit of $30 000 in a rolling five-year period.

What happens if the gifting limits are exceeded?
If the gifting limits are breached, the amount in excess of the gifting limit is considered to be a deprived asset of the person and/or their spouse.

The deprived amount is then assessed as an asset for 5 anniversary years from the date of gift. It is assessed as an asset for asset test purposes and subject to deeming under the income test.
After the expiration of the 5 year period, the deprived amount is neither considered to be a person’s asset nor deemed.

Example 1: Single pensioner – gifts not impacted by deprivation rules

Sally, a single pensioner, has financial assets valued at $275,000. She has decided to gift some money to her son to improve his financial situation. Her plan for gifting is as follows:

Financial year	2017/18	2018/19	2019/20	2020/21	2021/22	2022/23
Amount gifted	$6,000	$6,000	$6,000	$6,000	$6,000	$6,000

With this gifting plan, Sally is not affected by either gifting rule. This is because she has kept under the $10,000 in a single year rule and also within the $30,000 per rolling five-year period.

Example 2: Single pension – Gifts impacted by both gifting rules

Peter is eligible for the Age Pension. He has given away the following amounts:

Financial year	Amount gifted	Deprived asset assessed using the $10,000 in a financial year free area rule	Deprived asset assessed using the $30,000 five-year free area rule
2017/18	$33,000	$23,000	$0
2018/19	$2,000	$0	$0

In this case, $23,000 of the $33,000 given away in 2017/18 exceeds the gifting limit (the first limit of $10,000) for that financial year, so it will continue to be treated as an asset and subject to deeming for five years.
In 2018/19, while gifts totalling $35,000 have been made, no deprived asset is assessed under the five-year rule after taking into account the deprived assets already assessed, ie $33,000 + $2,000 – $23,000 = $12,000, which is less than the relevant limit of $30,000.

Example 3: Couple impacted by both gifting rules

Ted and Alice are eligible for the Age Pension. They give away the following amounts:

Financial year	Amount gifted	Deprived asset assessed using the $10,000 in a financial year free area rule	Deprived asset assessed using the $30,000 five-year free area rule
2017/18	$10,000	$0	$0
2018/19	$13,000	$3,000	$0
2019/20	$10,000	$0	$0
2020/21	$10,000	$0	$10,000
2021/22		Any gifts in 2014/15 will be assessed as deprived assets under the five-year rule

In this case, $3,000 of the $13,000 given away in 2018/19 exceeds the gifting limit for that year, so it will continue to be treated as an asset and subject to deeming for five years. The $10,000 given away in 2020/21 exceeds the $30,000 limit for the five-year period commencing on 1 July 2017, so it will also continue to be treated as an asset and subject to deeming for five years.

Are some gifts exempt from the rules?

Certain gifts can be made without triggering the gifting provisions. Broadly speaking, these include:
− Assets transferred between the members of a couple. A common example is where a person who has reached Age Pension age withdraws money from their superannuation and contributes it to a superannuation account in the name of the spouse who has not yet reached age pension age.
− Certain gifts made by a family member or a certain close relative to a Special Disability Trust. For more information on Special Disability Trusts, refer to Department of Human Services – Special Disability Trusts.
− Assets given or construction costs paid for a ‘granny flat’ interest. See Department of Human Services – Granny Flat Interest for further detail.

Trying to be too smart – Gifting prior to claim

Contrary to what many read on the internet any amounts gifted in the five years prior to accessing the Age Pension or other allowance are subject to the gifting rules

Deprivation provisions do not apply when a person has disposed of an asset within the five years prior to accessing the Age Pension or other allowance but could not reasonably have expected to become qualified for payment. For example, a person qualifies for a social security entitlement after unexpected death of a partner or job loss.

Gifting and deceased estates

The gifting rules apply to a person’s interest in a deceased estate if the person does any of the following:

− Gives away their right to their interest in a deceased estate for no/inadequate consideration,
− Directs the executor to distribute their interest in a deceased estate for no/inadequate consideration, or
− After the estate has been finalised, gives away their interest in a deceased estate to a third-party for no/inadequate consideration.
The above rules apply even if the deceased died without a will.

Gifting and death of a partner
In some circumstances, couples in receipt of a social security benefit may give away assets prior to death of one of them. Prior to death, any deprived assets would have been assessed against the pensioner couple for five years from the date of the disposal. Now that a member of the couple has passed away, how will the deprived assets be assessed for the surviving partner?
The amount of deprivation that continues to be held against a surviving partner depends on who legally owned the assets prior to death.

Table 1: Gifting and death of a partner

Legal owner of the deprived asset	Assessment of deprived assets
jointly,	does not change.
by the deceased partner,	is reduced to zero.
by the surviving partner,	increases by the amount held against the deceased partner by the outstanding balance held against the deceased partner.

Example 4: Death of a partner

Daryl (age 84) and Gail (age 78) gifted an apartment worth $260,000 to their son Ethan on 1 July 2019. At the time the gift was made, Centrelink assessed $250,000 as a deprived asset. Daryl passed away on 1 July 2020.
The treatment of the deprived assets for Gail will depend on who legally owned the assets prior to Daryl’s death. The impact of different ownership options is shown below:

Legal owner of the deprived asset	Assessment of deprived assets
jointly,	Half of the asset value of the deprived asset will be assessed against the surviving spouse. As the amount of the deprived asset is $250,000, only $125,000 will be assessed against Gail
by the deceased partner,	No amount will be assessed against the surviving partner. As the amount of the deprived asset is $250,000, the amount assessable to Gail is $0.
by the surviving partner,	The full amount will continue to be assessed against the surviving partner. As the amount of the deprived asset is $250,000, the amount assessable to Gail remains at $250,000.

Want a Centrelink Review or are you just looking for an adviser that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? Then why not contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options. Do it! make this the year to get organised or it will be 2028 before you know it.

Please consider passing on this article to family or friends. Pay it forward!

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

31 Comments

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on September 6, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in Age Pension, Centrelink, Financial Planning, Pension Strategies

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on September 6, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/09/06/how-the-centrelink-gifting-rules-work/

Search for specific topics

Search for:

Recent Posts
Previous Posts by Topic
- Contribution Strategies (83)
  - In Specie transfers (5)
  - Salary Sacrifice (15)
  - Small Business CGT (2)
  - Superannuation Splitting (18)
  - Tax Planning (64)
- education (15)
- Education costs (2)
- Estate Planning (39)
  - Anti-Detriment (2)
  - Binding Death Nominations (15)
  - Enduring Power of Attorney (7)
  - Reversionary Pension (13)
  - testamentary trust (1)
- Financial Planning (62)
  - Bankruptcy Protection (1)
  - Contributions (10)
  - Divorce (5)
  - downsizing (6)
  - Superannuation (27)
- Insurance Strategies (14)
  - Income Protection (3)
  - Life Insurance (7)
  - Salary Continuance (3)
  - Total & Permanent Disability (4)
- Investment Strategies (73)
  - Asset Allocation (22)
  - Behavioural Finance (3)
  - Bonds (5)
  - Borrowing (21)
    - Loans (12)
    - LRBA (14)
  - Botcoin (1)
  - Buy-backs (1)
  - Franking Credits (14)
  - Hybrids (3)
  - International Investing (7)
  - Investor Education (6)
  - Property (25)
  - Results Season (2)
  - Term Deposits (7)
- Retirement Planning (91)
  - Age Pension (7)
  - Centrelink (19)
    - CHSC (2)
  - Downsizing (1)
  - Lifestyle (4)
  - Pension Strategies (36)
  - Pensions (33)
- SMSF (102)
  - News & Stats (47)
- SMSF alternatives (2)
- SMSF Management (122)
  - Audit (18)
  - Checklists (23)
  - Deeds (1)
  - Scam Alert (2)
  - SMSF Exit Strategies (2)
  - TBAR reporting (4)
  - Trustee (70)
Like us on Facebook

Like us on Facebook
Blog Stats
- 863,248 hits

Liam Shorte

IFA 2023 Excellence Awards – SMSF Advisor of the Year – Finalist

Get advice – Have a chat

Free Email Updates

Top Posts & Pages

Connect with me

All posts tagged Investment

If you exceed the concessional contributions cap

If you exceed the non-concessional contributions cap

If you do nothing

Temporary timeframe extension for SMSF and APRA funds to release the money.

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Here are ten questions to ask yourself about handling life changes in retirement:

Share this:

Why Bill Shorten is wrong — and right — on dividends

Share this:

Share this:

At SMSF Coach and our Financial Planning arm Verante, we believe in your financial wellbeing and improving your understanding of financial concepts.

Watch this short video which explains what is available in this vast knowledge base.

No Credit Card required.

It includes a whole module on SMSF education and

Self-Managed Super Funds section includes:

Share this:

Don’t be the one who leaves a mess behind!

Share this:

The Vanguard Group, Inc.: Key facts and figures*

Share this:

How the SMSF regulations affect investing in Bitcoin, Ethereum or other cryptocurrencies

Considerations before investing in Bitcoin:

Share this:

UPDATE

So what is in your transfer balance account (TBA)?

These are Credits to your account

These are Debits to your account

Commutations

Structured settlement contributions

Events resulting in a reduction of your super interest

Commutation authorities

Payment split upon divorce or relationship breakdown

Failure to comply with pension or annuity standards

Self-managed super fund (SMSF) reporting

Consequences of late reporting

Share this:

Share this:

Reversionary pensions

Pensions

Transition to retirement income streams

Share this:

Do Your Sums Before Downsizing

1.1 The Clients

1.2 Assumptions

1.3 Scenario 1: Retain Current Home

1.4 Scenario 2: Downsizing Family Home in 2016/17

1.5 Scenario 3: Downsizing Family Home in 2027/28

1.6 Comparing the Scenarios

1.7 Conclusions

1.8 Pathfinder Learnings

Share this:

What is considered a gift for Centrelink purposes?

What are the gifting limits?

Example 1: Single pensioner – gifts not impacted by deprivation rules

Example 2: Single pension – Gifts impacted by both gifting rules

Example 3: Couple impacted by both gifting rules

Are some gifts exempt from the rules?

Trying to be too smart – Gifting prior to claim

Gifting and deceased estates

Table 1: Gifting and death of a partner

Example 4: Death of a partner

Share this:

Search for specific topics

Recent Posts

Previous Posts by Topic

Blog Stats