Liam Shorte

Putting people back in control of their wealth
SMSF Adviser of the Year - Winner 2025
SMSF Adviser of the Year - Finalist 2025
SMSF Adviser of the Year 2024
IFA 2023 Excellence Awards – SMSF Advisor of the Year – Finalist
IFA 2021 Excellence Awards – SMSF Advisor of the Year – WINNER!!
IFA 2022 Excellence Awards – SMSF Advisor of the Year – Finalist
Get advice – Have a chat
Free Email Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe and be first to receive notifications of new posts by email. Go on it's FREE!

Email Address:

Join 6,364 other subscribers
Top Posts & Pages
Connect with me
Recent Tweets
Tweets by SMSFCoach
View William Shorte's Adviser Ratings profile
https://www.adviserratings.com.au/widget/278214/profile.js

All posts tagged Retirement

Who will mind my super and take care of me? – SMSF Member Incapacity and Estate Planning Checklist

What’s your plan for future incapacity

I recently did a co-presentation with Louise Biti from Aged Care Steps for the Self Managed Superannuation Fund Association on how SMSF Trustees can plan for incapacity or just that time when they no longer wish to run their fund. The response was great and the questions from the floor really brought it home to us that people are very concerned about how they pass control of their wealth and well-being to others. A copy of the presentation slides are available here . As part of my preparation I developed a simple checklist of issues that SMSF trustees should use when they consider their options. This list is not exhaustive so please add your own tips or suggestions in the comments section below.

When planning for the management of your funds in your SMSF you must first read the Deed!

You do have an Original copy of the Deed or a Certified copy don’t you?

Who do you want to manage your fund if you die or are incapacitated?

On death for Corporate Trustees you leave the shares in the trustee company via your will to the person(s) so they have a right to be a director of the trustee company.
For incapacity you provide an Enduring Power of Attorney (EPOA) and when required you resign as a director and they are appointed in your place. If it is your spouse and they are the only other member then they become Sole Director.
On death for Individual Trustees your Executor will usually have a right to be a trustee of the fund.
For incapacity you provide an Enduring Power of Attorney and when required you resign as a trustee and they are appointed in your place. If it is your spouse and they are the only other member then they need to find a second person to act as a trustee or move to a sole director company trustee.

What to consider in the choice of an EPOA/Executor

Are they good with money and making decisions?
Will they be willing to seek advice from specialists if necessary?
Will there be conflict between beneficiaries – Sibling rivalry? Blended families?
Should you consider 2 or more EPOAs/Executors for safety or support
a power of attorney (or POA) can either become effective immediately, or upon the occurrence of a future event (such as your mental incapacity).
A power of attorney can have specific clauses with instructions for the operation of the power.
If you have a spouse or dependant you may want to include Dependants Clauses to ensure your funds can be used for their needs.
You may want to consider a Conflict of Interest clause to allow a EPOA to make decisions that may suit them as well as you but to the detriment of other possible beneficiaries.

Who do you want to receive your SMSF account balance?

For Spouse / Dependants you should consider using a Reversionary Pension election or Non-Lapsing Binding Death Benefit Nomination direct to beneficiaries or via your will using Non-lapsing Binding Death Nomination to your Legal Personal Representative with option in your will to set up a Testamentary Trust. Normal BDBNs lapse after 3 years.
For Adult children you can use Non-Lapsing Binding Death Benefit Nomination direct to beneficiary or via your will using non-lapsing binding nomination to Legal Personal Representative with option in your will to set up a Testamentary Trust
For your parents, your siblings or non-family via your will using Non-lapsing Binding Death Benefit Nomination to your Legal Personal Representative with option in your will to set up a Testamentary Trust
Do any of the beneficiaries in your Will have special needs? For disabled beneficiaries consider a Special Disability Trust. For those poor with money or in a highly litigious career or in possible bankruptcy then a Testamentary Trust should be considered.

Who do you want to manage your care options if you are incapacitated?

Ensure you have an Enduring Power of Guardianship in place so that your lifestyle and medical treatment decisions can be made by a trusted family member or friend in the event that you become mentally incapable?
Do you have an Advanced Healthcare Directive in place in the event that you become terminally ill and are unable to articulate your wishes?
Have you spoken to your chosen Enduring Guardian so they are clear on your wishes and preferences, explained why you have made those decisions so that they can discuss these with any family members who have cause to question your wishes.

What to consider in the choice of an Enduring Guardian

Are they good with making personal decisions under pressure?
Will there be conflict with other family that they can handle– Sibling rivalry? Blended families?
Should you consider 2 or more EGs for safety or support

Information your Attorneys/Executors will need

Bank Accounts and Investments:

The BSB and account numbers for any accounts or credit cards you have.
The HIN, SRN of any Personal or SMSF shareholdings and
Account IDs for Share Brokers, Online Banking and Managed Fund holdings
Location of property deeds and contact details for Property manager

Insurance:

Details of policies such as the policy number and type of insurance.
Life and TPD cover, Motor vehicles, House Insurance, Private Medical Insurance and Funeral Plans

Advisers:

If you have an accountant, financial planner, lawyer or other professional advisor include their contact details.

Business Records:

If you have a business include details of where the company records are kept and the computer the ASIC Corporate Key is on.

Your secret place:
If important documents such as certificates of property title, jewellery and other valuables or personal items are being held in safe custody elsewhere or stashed in the attic then you should identify the location.

Your digital life:

Include all your email login in details and loyalty scheme account details. This includes your membership to social media and cloud data sites so your executors and family may be able to access your on-line data, including books or music files.
Appoint a Legacy Contact if you use Facebook.
Instructions on what is and isn’t to be shared with family

Direct Debits:

If you have any direct debits in place you should include details so that they can be cancelled pending a grant of probate.

Superannuation:

Do you have other superannuation accounts. Your most recent superannuation statement(s) should also be included. If it is self-managed super the financial statements should be included.

IMPORTANT POINT: Talk regularly to your Executors and Powers of Attorney and Enduring Guardian
Discuss your wishes in terms of lifestyle, healthcare and treatment options with your chosen Attorney and Guardian and if possible with the broader family and make sure that they understand your wishes. Australian’s are very reluctant to talk about illness or death but it is essential to ensure your wishes are followed and to avoid family conflict.

As I mentioned at the start this list is not exhaustive so please add your own tips or suggestions in the comments section below.

I hope this guidance has been helpful and please take the time to comment. Feedback always appreciated. Please reblog, retweet, like on Facebook etc to make sure we get the news out there. As always please contact me if you want to look at your own options. We have offices in Castle Hill and Windsor but can meet clients anywhere in Sydney or via Skype. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This website provides an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.

Leave a comment

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on May 21, 2018 • Permalink

Posted in Checklists, Enduring Power of Attorney, Estate Planning, News & Stats, Pensions, Retirement Planning, SMSF Management

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on May 21, 2018

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2018/05/21/who-will-mind-my-super-and-take-care-of-me-smsf-member-incapacity-and-estate-planning-checklist/

Phew! SCOMO delivers an SMSF friendly 2018-19 Federal Budget

Self-funded retirees have felt like punching bags for the last few years with hit after hit chipping away at their ability to fend for themselves within the rules they had relied upon in making their savings plans over the last 30 years. Combine the changing of goal posts with low interest rates and blue-chip underperformance from the banks, telcos and utilities and they are not to be blamed for thinking a hex had been put on them.

So an SMSF friendly budget is the welcome news coming out of the 2018-19 Federal Budget. With many of us SMSF Specialists and you the SMSF members still working through the wide-reaching and complex superannuation changes which took effect from 1 July 2017, this Federal Budget will provide much needed stability while looking to reduce costs for SMSFs and prove additional flexibility.

The key changes proposed for SMSFs and superannuation are:

Three-yearly audit cycle for some self-managed superannuation funds.

The Government will change the annual SMSF audit requirement to a three yearly requirement for SMSFs with a history of good record keeping and compliance. The measure will start on 1 July 2019 for SMSF trustees that have a history of three consecutive years of clear audit reports and that have lodged the fund’s annual returns in a timely manner.

One concern I have is if trustees make a mistake in year 1 that is not discovered until year 3, will they face 3 years interest charges on the penalties.

Expanding the SMSF member limit from four to six

As already announced, the Federal Government confirmed its decision to expand the number of members allowed in an SMSF from four to six. Expanding the definition of an SMSF to a fund with a maximum of six members will provide greater flexibility in how funds can be structured.

Whilst there are some concerns over making decisions I like this move where as mum and dad in their later years want to reduce their involvement but they want help rather with the fund rather than moving to separate retail funds. It may help prevent elder Financial abuse where instead of one child assuming control of the SMSF, more of the family could be involved. Temptation and inheritance impatience is always there for one person but add a few others in to the decision making and the risk of financial abuse reduces considerably.

Also 6 members of a family small business allows for later drawdown from the parents accounts and recontribution for younger family members to retain business real property in the fund after death of the older generation.

Note; you will need to ensure your trust deed allows more than 4 members and it most likely won’t so you will need to update the trust deed first before accepting new members. READ THE DEED

Over 65, 1 additional year Work test exemption

The Government will provide more time for Australians aged 65 to 74 to boost their retirement savings, by introducing an exemption from the superannuation work test.This exemption will apply where an individual’s total superannuation balance is below $300,000 and will permit voluntary superannuation contributions in the first year that they do not meet the work test requirements.

This is good but limited in its scope as more and More people have reached the $300k level because of Super Guarantee Contributions for most since 1992 or before for some. But it is a female friendly move as they are most likely to have lower balances

Life insurance cover in super to be opt-in for individuals under 25 years of age.

The Government will legislate that life insurance cover in superannuation will be opt-in for those individuals under 25 years of age or with account balances under $6000 to ensure that unnecessary fees do not erode smaller balances.

Life insurance cover will also cease where no contributions have been made for a period of 13 months.

If you have kept a retail or industry fund open with small balances to retain insurances you may need to put a small annual contribution in place (I would recommend $100 per half year just in case) to ensure it does not get tagged as dormant.

Older Australian package

The Government introduced the following measures to enhance the standard of living older Australians:

• Increase to the Pension Work Bonus from $250 to $300 per fortnight.

• Amendments to the pension means test rules to encourage the take up of lifetime retirement income products.

• Expansion of the Pensions Loan Scheme to allow more Australians to use the equity in their homes to increase their incomes.

I think this will be a major bonus for those with a lumpy asset or shareholding’s they wish to retain but need more cashflow. At a current rate of 5.25% the Pensions Loan Scheme is a very decent rate and security that you are borrowing from a bank or predatory lender based on a brokers conflicted commissions.

Personal income tax bracket changes (take most these with a pinch of salt!)

The Government has provided personal income tax relief to lower and middle income earners. A Low and Middle Income Tax Offset will now be available for individuals with incomes of up to $125,333.

The $87,000 income threshold, above which a 37 per cent tax rate applies, will increase to $90,000.

Other changes

• A surplus of $2.2 billion is expected in 2019-20, one year ahead of schedule.

• The Government’s planned increase in the Medicare levy from 2 per cent to 2.5 per cent, to fund the National Disability Insurance Scheme, will now not go ahead due to increased tax revenues.

How can we help?

Some of these measures may open up strategy options for you and your family.

If you have any questions or would like further clarification in regards to any of the above measures outlined in the 2018-19 Federal Budget, please feel free to give me a call or email to arrange a time to meet or talk by phone so that we can discuss your particular requirements in more detail.

Are you looking for an advisor that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? then why now contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

4 Comments

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on May 9, 2018 • Permalink

Posted in Contribution Strategies, Financial Planning, Retirement Planning, SMSF Management, Trustee

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on May 9, 2018

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2018/05/09/phew-scomo-delivers-an-smsf-friendly-2018-19-federal-budget/

Best Apolitical Analysis of Franking Credit Refund Removal Debate

Over this last week I have read so many politically biased responses to Bill Shorten’s proposed strategy to stop the refunds of franking credits that I despaired and I know it is going to be a political football rather than part of comprehensive tax reform. Then I came across a really well explained and positioned argument from Scott Phillips of The Motley Fool fame that takes the politics out of the analysis. I immediately reached out to Scott and asked him could I re-post it for my readers who may be finding the debate confusing or hard to explain to others. So here goes:

Why Bill Shorten is wrong — and right — on dividends

Scott Phillips

What’s that? Bill Shorten has announced a new policy on the refund of franking credits?

I hadn’t noticed.

Okay, that’s not true. I noticed. And, based on feedback on Twitter over the last week, many of you noticed, too.

If Shorten wanted to stir a hornet’s nest, he got just that. Maybe it’s clever politics. Maybe the focus groups told the pollsters this was a smart political strategy.

It sure as heck isn’t good policy, in my view.

Before you fire off an email to either abuse me or suggest I be knighted, let me explain.

I’m going to start with three premises that I think most people can agree on:

The tax system should be fair
You shouldn’t have to pay tax twice on dividend income; and
The tax system, as it stands, is broken.

That last point seems to be Shorten’s main thrust. And it’s a battle cry taken up by many partisans:

“We have a problem, and I have a solution. If you don’t like my solution, you’re saying we don’t have a problem.”

To which I reply:

“We absolutely have a problem. But your solution is a poor one. There are better ways to skin this cat.”

And before we go any further, please leave your political affiliations at the door. This week, on Twitter, I have bagged and praised Labor for different policies. I’ve done the same in the past to the Libs. If you can’t put aside your team jersey and engage in a discussion of ideas, then there’s not much for you in what follows.

But if you’re interested in good policy, read on.

Bill Shorten’s policy, as announced, goes something like this:

“We’re happy for you to reduce your tax using franking credits, but we’re not going to give you a refund.”

There are a few problems with that approach:

First, it implies that if you pay tax, you’re welcome to use the credits to reduce your tax burden to zero.

Second, those credits somehow magically are worthless once you hit zero, meaning that to me they’re worth something, but to a retiree in a 0% tax bracket, they’re worth nothing.

How can franking credits be worth different amounts to different people in different circumstances? Search me… I’m buggered if I know.

And third, and this is what’s stirred up most heat among those who have gone into bat for the policy:

“I pay tax and my taxes shouldn’t go to give a refund/handout to people who already have a lot of money.”

Now, don’t get me wrong. I think the current situation — regarding the ability to pay exactly zero tax on certain income in retirement that might be up to $80,000 — is crackers.

But, Shorten’s policy doesn’t fix that problem. Here’s why:

Consider three people, all of whom have SMSFs in pension phase, and who — according to the current tax rules — pay 0% tax: Banking Betty, Rental Richard and Dividend Davina.

Banking Betty deposits $100,000, and earns $2,000 each year in interest. Betty doesn’t pay any tax.
Rental Richard has a $100,000 property that pays him $2,000 each year in rent. Richard doesn’t pay any tax.
Dividend Davina buys $100,000 worth of shares that earned a profit of $2,000. The company paid tax of $600, so Davina gets $1,400. Davina doesn’t pay any tax.

See the difference here? Because Davina’s investment is in the form of shares in a company, she gets less than the other two. Even though she’s not supposed to pay any tax, the company paid tax, so she gets less.

Under current rules, she’d get the $600 back, delivering on the current government policy of a 0% tax rate, and equalising the return for each of those investors.

Bill Shorten, in effect, is penalising people for owning shares.

Now, let’s address the elephant in the room. Yes, because the company has already paid tax on that $2,000, Davina does officially get a refund. And the optics of that are bad: it looks like somehow the taxpayer is subsidising Davina.

But it’s all a question of cash flows and timing. The ATO just gives Davina back the money the company paid in tax.

And remember, a company is just a legal structure to organise your ownership interest in an asset. Shares in a company aren’t all that different in effect to accounts at a bank. Your bank account is evidence that you have a claim to a share of that bank’s assets, even if you don’t know specifically which notes you deposited.

Imagine a scenario under which Banking Betty’s bank withholds 30% of her interest and sends it to the government as tax. And where Rental Richard’s property manager is obligated to send 30% of his rental income to the ATO.

Both of these investors would have to fill out a tax return and the ATO would send them a refund — because tax was paid on their income, even though the tax rate should have been 0%.

Would Bill Shorten stop Betty and Richard getting their money back?

I doubt it.

But somehow, because Labor has (unfortunately, disingenuously) used extreme examples to make their point, and because they’ve dressed it up as a handout, they’ve mischaracterised the situation.

Somehow Dividend Davina is a fatcat living high on the hog, while Betty and Richard are perfectly entitled to pay no tax.

Essentially, because of the asset class they decide to invest in, our three protagonists are being treated differently.

Sound fair to you?

No, me neither.

Yes, the idea of a ‘refund’ for someone who has paid no tax feels, somehow, deeply wrong. But it’s because tax was paid by the company, on behalf of a shareholder who shouldn’t be paying tax, so the ATO is essentially just righting that wrong.

Still with me? Excellent!

Still fuming that well-off people pay no tax? Me too.

What? Didn’t I just spend 984 words (don’t waste time counting them. I checked) defending those people?

Well, yes. And no.

Here’s where both parties are engaging in a phony war of words. And we’re poorer for it.

Having an essentially uncapped income at a 0% tax rate is madness.

Yes, yes, it’s not technically uncapped, for a host of reasons. So let’s say $80,000 among friends.

You and I pay a decent slug of tax on an $80,000 income. And there’s no reason that a well-off retiree should be able to draw a completely untaxed income of a similar amount, when they likely have a very decent asset base — say a home and a seven-figure superannuation balance.

It’s simply not sustainable, especially as more boomers retire, to have that slice of the economic income pie remain completely untaxed.

But — and this is important — that doesn’t mean we should simply ban franking credit refunds and assume that fixes the problem.

Let’s go back to our alliterative actors, Betty, Richard and Davina.

If Betty was earning $80,000 in interest, should that be untaxed? Should Richard’s $80,000 in rent be untouched by the taxman? Should Davina’s $80,000 in dividends remain completely unscathed?

I don’t think so. But again, it’s not a question of the source of the income; it’s the size.

Under Bill Shorten’s plan, Davina would be worse off, but Betty and Richard laugh all the way to the bank. Does anyone, seriously, think that’s a good basis for a tax plan?

I didn’t think so.

Here’s what I’d do: I’d have a generous tax-free threshold for income from superannuation, maybe $10,000 or so above the pension level. It’s not unreasonable that you’re allowed a little extra, given the sacrifice you made to save for your retirement.

But above that level, I’d implement a progressive tax scale not unlike the one that applies to regular income: The more you earn, the higher your marginal tax rate.

Simple, no?

Fair, yes?

That way, the tax code doesn’t discriminate on the basis of the asset class. There are no free lunches. And the unsustainable tax situation that currently applies to Super is fixed.

So Bill Shorten, and Chris Bowen, it’s time to admit defeat and go back to the drawing board. Feel free to use my template, above.

And Scott Morrison and Malcolm Turnbull, please stop with the emotive and negative language and grandstanding.

Politics should be a battle of ideas, not soundbites The best idea, well explained, should win, regardless of political party or ideological affiliation.

And, ladies and gentlemen of the Parliament, the Australian people will give you bonus points for explaining it clearly and for anything that reduces the complexity of our tax affairs, while ensuring fairness.

Indeed, Turnbull and Morrison’s political forebear, John Howard spoke to the National Press Club in 2014 when he shared the stage with former Labor PM, Bob Hawke. At that event, according to the Sydney Morning Herald , Howard said

“We have sometimes lost the capacity to respect the ability of the Australian people to absorb a detailed argument. They will respond to an argument for change and reform [but] they want two requirements. They want to be satisfied it’s in the national interest, because they have a deep sense of nationalism and patriotism. They also want to be satisfied it’s fundamentally fair.”

I’d like to think that’s still true.

I agree with Bill Shorten’s characterisation of the problem. I disagree completely with his solution.

I imagine I lost the most partisan readers — of both stripes — a few minutes ago. If you’re still reading, thank you for engaging in a discussion of ideas.

I hope I’ve convinced some of you. Of those I haven’t convinced, I hope I’ve at least done a decent job of addressing the issue, without bias, grandstanding or misdirection. Thanks for reading.

At the very least, I hope I’ve productively added to the conversation. It’s the least each of us can do.

Fool on! Scott is @TMFScottP on Twitter and can be found here on The Motley Fool

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

5 Comments

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on March 18, 2018 • Permalink

Posted in Franking Credits, Investor Education, Pensions, Tax Planning

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on March 18, 2018

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2018/03/18/best-apolitical-analysis-of-franking-credit-refund-removal-debate/

Issues we cover before helping you set up an SMSF

Here are some of the key issues we will discuss with you to get a better understanding on whether an SMSF is suitable to meet your objectives and circumstances. They have been developed to address concerns about people being pushed or rushing in to a SMSF. We want to protect access to the SMSF option for the long-term.

What do you or your family want to achieve by establishing an SMSF . This explores your reasons for investigating this strategy and if it aligns with your short, medium and long-term goals or is it something you have just felt was right for you. We will have no hesitation in suggesting you consider alternatives that may meet your true objectives. We don’t believe an SMSF is right for everyone.
Is contributing more to superannuation the right option for you at your age when we take in to account your financial commitments now and in the future as this money will be locked away until you meet a condition of release most likely in your 60’s. It may be more appropriate for your to concentrate on using excess funds for debt reduction, medium term investing in your name or an insurance bond for tax minimisation while retaining access to the capital. We develop our strategies to suit you!
Is running a strategy via an SMSF suitable for you in terms of your experience, knowledge and available time. There are many busy executives, truck drivers and small business owners that I have had to talk out of running and SMSF when they can’t even find 1 hour in their week to schedule a meeting or even engage via Skype to understand their trustee obligations. Yet they thought they run a $800,000 investment portfolio! I hesitate to mention the one who said he could do his research while driving to work on his mobile! Or the couple who felt they were “property experts” because they had 4 Queensland regional properties, having never once visited any of them or done more than a cursory Google search using the highest valuations found and ignoring recent listings. By the time we analysed the portfolio they were going nowhere, low-income and negative capital growth. On asking for Property Inspection reports we found they were also up for tens of thousands in repairs and maintenance over the coming years. It was agreed that their super was safer in their well diversified existing strategy than another “punt” on property in an SMSF until learned more about property investing from a Buyer’s Agent.
What funds do have to rollover from an existing fund(s). Are you able to move those funds? Some people are in government, military or state funds that cannot be accessed before a certain age like MSBS or Local Govt Super or maybe a Defined Benefit Scheme that’s too sweet to leave! Are you able to redirect future Super Guarantee contributions from your employer as some have a mandated fund under enterprise bargaining agreements etc. Are there high exit fees or underlying investments that are not liquid? Is it the right move for you?
Have insurance needs been adequately identified and addressed for your future protection? We have to look at the current insurances in place and do a needs analysis to see if they should be maintained, altered, replaced or cancelled.
We need to know if you are aware of and clear about trustee responsibility? This blog and other material we point you to will give you the knowledge base you require to run a fund. We may suggest you do this education before committing to setting up the SMSF. Your urgency to set up a fund does not let us abrogate our duties.
We will walk you through the costs of setting up and administering the SMSF annually as well as costs related to specific strategies you want to undertake? This includes fees associated with all related aspects of SMSFs including advice, investments, establishment, legal and administration?
We will explain the pros and cons risks v benefits of establishing an SMSF? We will not necessarily encourage or discourage you but we will ensure you are fully informed and provide support coaching.
We will help you with the development and management of the SMSF investment strategy and ensure it is compliant and will help achieve your objectives. We will ground you in reality (no reasonable investment will provide excessive returns long-term so we might burst a few myths.
If the SMSF is to engage in borrowing or gearing? We will guide you around what is a reasonable level of gearing in your circumstances and to achieve your retirement plans and analyse the affordability of the gearing strategy. We will provide you with a full 3 step guide on the rules, the process and the mistakes to avoid during implementation.

One last warning :

We want you to use the right strategy at the right time for your future financial security.

This may explain why from 2017 to 2025 we have been one of the most recognised among the best of the best SMSF Advisers in a number of professional awards.

(more…)

Leave a comment

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on January 30, 2018 • Permalink

Posted in education, SMSF, SMSF alternatives, SMSF Management, Trustee

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on January 30, 2018

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2018/01/30/issues-we-cover-before-helping-you-set-up-an-smsf/

SMSF Corporate Trustee Structure Finally Outnumbering Individual Trustees.

For the last decade every time I saw the SMSF statistical results issued by the ATO I was dismayed by the number of new SMSF funds being set up with Individual Trustees, often well over 80% each year. I assumed this was people setting up self managed superannuation funds without good advice or reasonable research.

So I was delighted to see the latest stats provided by the ATO for 2015-16 but including some 2016-17 data which has seen a complete turnaround with over 80% of new SMSFs being set up with Corporate Trustees and the overall numbers on existing funds turning in favour of using a company.

SMSF trustee structure

At 30 June 2017, 57% of all SMSFs had a corporate trustee rather than individual trustees.
Of newly registered SMSFs in 2015 to 2017, on average 81% were established with a corporate trustee.

A few times over the last 5 years I have run polls asking professionals in the SMSF industry whether they would recommend individual or corporate trustees. Every time the overwhelming result is in favour of Corporate Trustees.

So over 90% of professionals who deal day in day out with SMSF issues and like myself deal with some of the fallout when approached by grieving widows(ers), recommend a Corporate trustee for an SMSF.

Costs

Costs should not be a deterrent as a sole Purpose Trustee company only costs about $600-$880 to set up and the ASIC review fee is only $48 per year and you can lock that in and get a discount for up to 10 years. See here for more detail on that discount.

I have set out my arguments for a Corporate Trustee in this previous article Why Self Managed Super Funds Should Have A Corporate Trustee. If you are considering an SMSF the I would encourage you to read through that article and feel free to pass it on to your friends, family or advisors.

Finally if you are considering trying to save some costs by using the same company as your Business or Family Discretionary Trust then I would recommend you read this article first: Trading Company as SMSF Trustee or Sole Purpose SMSF Trustee Company?

Are you looking for an advisor that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? Then why now contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

Leave a comment

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on January 23, 2018 • Permalink

Posted in News & Stats, SMSF Management, Trustee

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on January 23, 2018

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2018/01/23/smsf-corporate-trustee-structure-finally-outnumbering-individual-trustees/

Introducing our new Financial Knowledge Centre – for DIY Research

At SMSF Coach and our Financial Planning arm Verante, we believe in your financial wellbeing and improving your understanding of financial concepts.

We understand that the financial industry is full of jargon and concepts that can be difficult for people to get their head around or remember.

So to learn more about money and finance, our Financial Knowledge Centre is a great place to start.

It contains a huge library of articles, life events, videos, quiz’s and calculators, so that you can learn about managing money while having a bit of fun at the same time.

The best part of all is that you work at your own pace and we offer a free trial to one and all but it will always be free to our clients as part of our advice service.

Watch this short video which explains what is available in this vast knowledge base.

Visit The Financial Knowledge Centre and try it out FREE for a month

No Credit Card required.

It includes a whole module on SMSF education and

Self-Managed Super Funds section includes:

–	SMSF Overview
	What is an SMSF?
+	The Decision Making Process
+	The Costs of running an SMSF
+	Setting up an SMSF
+	Appointing trustees
+	Individual Trustee vs. Corporate Trustee
+	Ongoing Administration
+	Accepting Rollovers and Contributions
+	Investment decisions and rules
+	Insurance Considerations
+	Tax Considerations for SMSFs
+	Paying Benefits from an SMSF
+	Death of an SMSF member
+	Estate Planning
+	Getting more help
+	Closing a SMSF
+	Federal Budget 2017/18 Proposals
+	SMSF Summary

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

Leave a comment

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on January 18, 2018 • Permalink

Posted in education, Financial Planning, Insurance Strategies, News & Stats, Retirement Planning, SMSF Management

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on January 18, 2018

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2018/01/18/introducing-our-new-financial-knowledge-centre-for-diy-research/

Do you have an SMSF Trust Deed that is Signed and Dated

Ok this may seem like a boring question but have you actually checked if you have a copy of your latest SMSF deed on file or that your accountant and financial adviser have one of file? Has it been dated properly and signed and witnessed properly by all parties.

In this era of everyone rushing around and having busy lives, it’s the little things that get missed and that can cause a huge problem later. An unsigned or undated deed may result in your fund being found non-compliant and unable to function or leave major headaches for your beneficiaries. If you are a professional adviser then those disgruntled parties will be looking for someone still alive to blame and pick up the costs.

An SMSF trust deed is a legal document that sets out the rules for establishing and operating your fund. It includes such things as the fund’s objectives, what the fund can invest in, who can be a member and whether benefits can be paid as a lump sum or income stream. The trust deed and super laws together form the fund’s governing rules.

The trust deed must be:

prepared by someone qualified to do so – it’s a legal document
signed and dated by all trustees
properly executed according to state or territory laws
regularly reviewed, and updated as necessary.

I take over management of a lot of funds and we are seeing many cases where the original trust deed was signed correctly and dated but a subsequent update or deed of amendment is sitting on the file unsigned or undated.

It is illegal to sign and backdate documents. As the Trustee of your fund it is your responsibility to ensure that deeds are legally compliant, signed and up to date.

If you are an Accountant, Administrator, Financial Planner or Auditor then you may share in the responsibility to ensure that deeds are compliant and properly completed. Your client may love you but their beneficiaries may come looking for someone to blame if an unsigned deed means a compliance breach with heavy tax or administrative penalties.

So what should you do.

See if you have a SMSF deed in your files and check if it is properly signed, witnessed and dated.
If you don’t have a copy then email your accountant and financial adviser and ask then to confirm if they have a signed and dated original copy on file. If they do then ask for a Certified Copy.
If in checking you see that the deed is dated pre-2012 then ask your Administrator or Accountant if it has been updated and read my previous blog 15 Reasons to update your SMSF Deed for new strategies in 2017
If it has been updated with a Deed of Amendment, has that been signed and dated? Get a copy of all Deeds of Amendment for your records so you can show the full history of your fund. Keep a copy yourself in case you fall out with your professional advisers.

Don’t be the one who leaves a mess behind!

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

2 Comments

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on December 7, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in Audit, Deeds, SMSF Management, Trustee

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on December 7, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/12/07/do-you-have-an-smsf-trust-deed-that-is-signed-and-dated/

Trust deeds in the new SMSF world – Benefit payments and estate planning

Your superannuation trust deed along with the superannuation laws form the governing rules that self managed super funds (SMSFs) needs to operate by. The introduction of the $1.6 million transfer balance cap (TBC) and new transition to retirement income stream (TRIS) rules are a ‘game changer’ for SMSFs when discussing benefit payments and estate planning. With the new super rules in effect as of 1 July 2017, now is the right time to review if your trust deed needs to be enhanced or amended to deal with the new approaches and strategies you may need to implement.

Read the deed

The first step in reviewing your superannuation trust deed will be to read it. Trust deeds are legal documents which can be complex to read, so you may want help from an advisor with this.

It is likely that most deeds will not result in a breach of any superannuation laws and would provide the trustee with powers to comply with relevant tax and superannuation laws as they change over time.

The next step would be to review the deed in consideration with your own circumstances.

For example, a common scenario may be a restrictive deed that only provides the trustee with a discretion to pay death benefits. Therefore, if a member of that SMSF wanted to create a binding death benefit nomination, it would be irrelevant due to the deed’s governing rules.

In any event, deeds which are clearly out of date will need to be amended as soon as possible.

Deeds post 1 July 2017

Post 1 July 2017, there are many approaches and strategies that will differ from the past and it is essential to ensure that your SMSF deed does not restrict you in anyway. We note the following areas should be considered:

Paying death benefits

The $1.6 million TBC now restricts the amount of money that can be kept in super on the death of a member. This is crucially important as when a member dies, their TBC dies with them. SMSF members should review their estate planning and further review their trust deed for the following:

Does it allow for binding death benefit nominations (BDBN)?
Do BDBNs lapse every 3 years in accordance with the trust deed when the legislation does not prescribe it?
Does it consider the appropriate solution when there is a conflict between a reversionary pension and a BDBN and which will take precedence?

Reversionary pensions

Reversionary pensions are pensions which continue being paid to a dependant after your death. Under the TBC, reversionary pensions will not count towards a member’s TBC until 12 months after the date of the original recipient’s death. Importantly, the transfer of the pension from the deceased to the new recipient will count towards the TBC. The value of the credit to the TBC will be the value of the pension at the date of death, not the value after 12 months. This increases the complexity of reversionary pensions prompting a review of trust deeds to consider:

Does it allow for a reversionary pension to be added to an existing pension or are there restrictions?
Should it automatically ensure that a pension is reversionary so that it is paid to a surviving spouse?

Pensions

The TBC also has implications for strategies in commencing pensions and making benefit payments. Trust deeds may need to be reviewed for:

Ensuring that commutations are able to be moved into accumulation phase rather than being forced as lump sums out of superannuation.
Are there any specific provisions relating to the TBC? There may be value in ensuring that the deed restricts pensions from being commenced with a value greater than the TBC.
Are there provisions which detail where commutations must be sourced from first?
Are there restrictive pension provisions that the trustees must comply with?

Transition to retirement income streams

Tax concessions for TRISs where the recipient does not have unrestricted access to their superannuation savings (known as meeting a condition of release with a nil chasing restriction) have also been removed. Trust deeds may need to be reviewed for:

Does the deed allow for the 10% maximum benefit payment to fall away once a nil condition of release is met?
Does the deed deal with a TRIS’s character when a nil condition of release? (Does it convert into an account based pension?)

How can we help?

SMSF Specialist Advisors can help you understand how the new laws may impact you and partner with a lawyer/Deed provider to review and amend your trust deed as required. Please feel free to give me a call to arrange a time to meet so that we can discuss your particular requirements, especially in regards to issues that may arise out of the latest super laws, in more detail.

For further educational information please subscribe to this blog and also visit the SMSF Association’s Trustee Knowledge Centre (http://trustees.smsfassociation.com/) to keep on top of the latest changes and information to reach your retirement goals and get the most out of your self managed super fund.

Want a Superannuation Review or are you just looking for an adviser that will keep you up to date and provide guidance and tips like in this blog? Then why now contact me at our Castle Hill or Windsor office in Northwest Sydney to arrange a one on one consultation. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options. Do it! make this the year to get organised or it will be 2028 before you know it.

Please consider passing on this article to family or friends. Pay it forward!

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

Leave a comment

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on September 29, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in Estate Planning, SMSF Management, Trustee

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on September 29, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/09/29/trust-deeds-in-the-new-smsf-world-benefit-payments-and-estate-planning/

Don’t Rush in to Downsizing Your Home

I love working on strategies for clients but sometimes you just need a true expert or excellent software to crunch the numbers. I was looking for some ideas on downsizing as it had become clear to me that is was not the panacea to retirement funding that client’s often believe it would be. So I was looking for an in-depth article working through the numbers and Rob van Dalen of Optimo Financial has kindly stepped up to provide the required analysis in our latest guest blog. Rob’s main warning is to do your sums on your own particular situation before leaping in to a downsizing strategy.

Rob van Dalen | General Manager

T 02 8622 2296
rvandalen@optimofinancial.com.au | www.optimofinancial.com.au

Optimo Financial
Suite 204, 10-12 Clarke Street, Crows Nest NSW 2065
PO Box 931, Crows Nest NSW 1585

Do Your Sums Before Downsizing

A popular subject often talked about at family barbecues is; “should mum and dad downsize when they get older?” Often it’s assumed that downsizing is the best option moving forward. To test and possibly challenge this we decided to run a few scenarios through our Pathfinder Financial Optimisation Platform to find out. Read our findings below;

1.1 The Clients

In this example, we look at the case of David and Alice who have recently retired and who will soon both be eligible for the age pension. David was born on 11 April 1953 while Alice was born on 15 November 1952. They have a modest $400,000 in super. Their other assets are the family home valued at $900,000 and personal assets valued at $40,000. They have no debt. They would like to have $50,000pa (increasing at CPI) for living expenses. They are worried that their super is not sufficient to maintain their desired income. Consequently, they have contemplated selling the family home and moving to a cheaper area where they could buy a new home for $500,000. Will downsizing leave them better off?

1.2 Assumptions

We have assumed in the analysis:

· Pension fund returns 5.7%pa;

· House selling costs 2.5%;

· House purchase costs 6% (including stamp duty);

· House prices in the long term increase at 3%pa;

· CPI 2.5%p.a.

1.3 Scenario 1: Retain Current Home

We first examine the scenario where David and Alice retain their current home. In this case, they will receive income from the government pension as well as drawing a pension from their own super. Figure 1 shows the sources of their income over a 20 year period.

David and Alice receive approximately 64% of their income from the age pension and associated benefits (see also Figure 6 below). The remainder is withdrawn from their pension account through withdrawing the minimum amount each year (plus some extra for the first few years until they become eligible for the age pension).

Their age pensions are limited approximately equally by the income and assets tests. After 20 years, David and Alice have a combined wealth of $1,960,000 most of which is from the family home.

1.4 Scenario 2: Downsizing Family Home in 2016/17

The next scenario sees David and Alice downsizing their family home from $900,000 to $500,000 in 2016/17. Their ages enable them to deposit the excess funds generated from the house sale into super as non-concessional contributions. However, a Pathfinder® analysis shows that increasing their superannuation balance reduces their age pension because, unlike the family home, super counts towards the age pension assets test and is deemed for the income test. Figure 2 shows the results of the age pension assets and income tests for David and Alice and we can see that their pension is now limited by the assets test. For a home owning couple, the age pension reduces at a rate of $3 per fortnight for each $1,000 of assets in excess of $575,000. This taper rate was doubled from 1 January 2017, so now has a much larger impact on the pension received.

So in 2019/20, for example, their age pension reduces from $36,337 to $9,004 and they must draw more from their pension account to make up the difference. Their wealth after 20 years is now projected at $1,581,000 or about $379,000 less than in the first scenario.

1.5 Scenario 3: Downsizing Family Home in 2027/28

In the third scenario, we examine the possibility that David and Alice defer the downsizing for ten years, say in 2027/28. Their age pension is initially unaffected until they downsize the family home, but after that time their age pension payments are severely curtailed. Their projected wealth after 20 years is now $1,714,000. This is a better outcome than in the second scenario but is still $246,000 less than if they keep their existing home.

1.6 Comparing the Scenarios

Figure 3 gives a comparison of the annual age pension received in the three scenarios. You can see that the scenario where they retain their current home, yields a higher pension and that their pension drops sharply after the sale of their house in the other two scenarios.

Figure 4 shows the total age pension payments over the 20 years. You can see that by keeping their original family home, their total pension entitlement is significantly higher than either of the downsizing options we analysed.

Figure 5 shows the total wealth over the 20 year period analysed.

The first point to note is the importance of the age pension towards retirement income, depending, of course, on the particular circumstances. Figure 6 shows the composition of retirement income over the 20 years analysed for Scenario 1.

1.7 Conclusions

In this example, the age pension plus estimated concession card benefits contribute about 64% to income while the account based pensions contribute about 36%. The second point is that downsizing the family home may not result in improving the overall situation as an increase in payments from a private pension may be more or less offset by a decrease in the age pension.

1.8 Pathfinder Learnings

In our Pathfinder® analysis, we find, perhaps surprisingly, that a couple could be considerably worse off by downsizing the family home. Any funds added to super by the income generated from downsizing could be dissipated by a reduction in the age pension. In addition, the costs of sale and repurchase of a family home are significant.

The age pension can provide a buffer between retirement savings and lifestyle expenses.

For persons eligible for the age pension, downsizing the family home may leave you worse off financially because of the impact of the age pension income and assets test.

Thank you Robby

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

2 Comments

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on September 12, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in Centrelink, Contribution Strategies, Downsizing, Pension Strategies, Property, Retirement Planning

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on September 12, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/09/12/dont-rush-in-to-downsizing-your-home/

The importance of the Retirement Condition of Release after age 60

Most people who have not sat with a planner or read in detail the newsletters from their superannuation funds would believe that they can only access their superannuation when they actually retire and stop working. But there are so many other circumstances that could trigger an all-important “Condition of Release” and make your retirement funds available to you. In this guide for SMSF trustees I will concentrate on meeting the Retirement Condition of Release but you can find out about the other conditions of release here (click it later).

Acknowledgement: I have relied on the excellent guidance of the AMP TAPin team for the majority of the content in this article. They write great technical articles for advisors and I try and make them SMSF trustee friendly.

What is the Retirement condition of release

The retirement condition of release is often subject to complexity and doubt. However, understanding the rules became even more important after 1 July 2017 resulting from the 2016 Budget measures. The tax exemption on investment earnings supporting a Transition to Retirement Income Stream- Accumulation Phase (TRIS – Accumulation) is no longer available. However, a TRIS will regain its tax exempt status once the ‘retirement’ condition of release is satisfied and it becomes a Transition to Retirement Income Stream- Retirement Phase (TRIS – Retirement Phase). Therefore, understanding what constitutes ‘retirement’ for an SMSF member in a TRIS is critical, to achieve that holy grail of a tax-free retirement pension.

Conditions of release – overview

Death is the only condition of release that requires compulsory cashing of benefits. There is no requirement under any other condition of release to either cash out a benefit or commence an income stream from your SMSF, and member accounts can remain in accumulation phase indefinitely.

If you do leave your member account in accumulation phase, it will be subject to an income tax rate of up to 15% instead of a 0% tax rate for investments backing a pension income stream. There is also now a $1.9m limit on how much can be transferred into an income stream with people who already had some money in pension phase having as pro-rata limit of between $1.6m and $1.9m. You can Check on MyGov.> ATO service> Super Tab> Information to see your limit.

The most common conditions of release to access your account are:

Reaching preservation age of 60 and retiring.
Transitioning to retirement (after attaining preservation age): SMSF members who are under 65 and have reached preservation age, but remain gainfully employed on a full-time or part-time basis, may access their benefits as a non-commutable income stream called a Transition to Retirement Income Stream- Accumulation Phase (TRIS – Accumulation Phase) . However from 1 July 2017 that income stream will not be tax exempt until you meet a further Retirement Condition of Release.
Reaching age 65: a Member who is 65 years old may access their benefits anytime without restrictions.

Retirement condition of release

For superannuation purposes, a member’s retirement depends on their age and future employment intentions. A person cannot access superannuation benefits under the retirement condition of release until they reach preservation age. Once you reach your preservation age, the definition of retirement depends on whether the person has reached age 60.

If a person has never been gainfully employed in their life, they cannot use the retirement condition of release to access their Preserved Benefits. Such a person would need to satisfy another condition of release to access their benefits (eg reaching age 65, invalidity, terminal illness, severe financial hardship).

Age 60 but less than 65

When a person has reached age 60, retirement occurs when an arrangement under which the person was gainfully employed has ceased on or after the person reached age 60. It does not matter that the person may intend to return to the workforce. This condition presents an opportunity for many people to move a taxed pension to tax exempt phase earlier.

Example: Reaching age 60

Michelle has worked as a nurse for many years. She resigns from this employment on her 61st birthday. Three months later, Michelle takes up a 3 day position as a grief counsellor. Because Michelle has ceased employment as a nurse after her 60th birthday, she can access all her superannuation accumulated up until that point.

Situations sometimes arise where a person, aged 60 or over, is in two or more employment arrangements at the same time. According to APRA Prudential Practice Guide SPG 280, the cessation of one of the employment arrangements is the condition of release in respect of all preserved benefits accumulated up until that time. The occurrence of the ‘retirement’ condition of release in these circumstances will not enable the cashing of any benefits which accrue after the condition of release has occurred. A person will not be able to cash those benefits until another condition of release occurs (eg,s he also leaves her second employer).

Example: Two employment arrangements

Frank (age 63) works part-time as a school janitor. During the school holidays, he had a short-term six-week contract to work as a Census form collector. The contract finished in September 2021.

Because Frank has ceased one of his employment arrangements, he can access all his superannuation up until that point. However, any later contributions made (employer and personal contributions) and earnings will be preserved.

Director and Employee of own company

Sometimes a person is both an employee and director of their own company. They may wish to cease their employment duties with the company, but retain their directorship. The question arises as to whether such a person (age 60 – 64) can access their preserved superannuation benefits.

If a person is engaged in more than one arrangement of employment, the person can cease any arrangement of employment to meet the ‘age 60’ definition of retirement.

Therefore, as long as a person’s two roles are separate and they terminate in their capacity as an employee of the company, then even though they are still employed in the capacity as director, that person can access their preserved superannuation entitlements.

Note that there must be a distinct termination, ie cessation of all duties as an employee, and the person should now only operate in the capacity as a director for the company.

We see this lot where often a spouse had helped out for years but as the children join the business or the business matures, the requirement for the spouse to continue turning up day-to-day reduces. They can step away from the duties as an employee but they may still handle the liaison with the tax agent on the financials, ASIC re company registration and the ATO to pay tax instalments, which are more akin to Directors Duties.

When is a person gainfully employed?

Someone is said to be ‘gainfully employed’, for superannuation purposes, where they are employed or self-employed for gain or reward in any business, trade, profession, vocation, calling, occupation, or employment.

Gainful employment can either be on a part-time or full time basis.

Part-time means at least 10 hours per week and less than 30 hours per week.
Full time means at least 30 hours per week.

The definition of gainful employment involves two clear components:

Employment or self-employment, and
Gain or reward.

The term employee is not specifically defined in the SIS Act for this purpose; its common law meaning must be considered. One definition of employee is ‘a person in a service of

another under any contract of hire (whether the contract was expressed or implied, oral or written), where the employer has the power or right to control and direct the employee in the material details of how the work is to be performed’.

In contrast, self-employed people work for themselves instead of an employer, drawing an income from a trade, profession, or business that they operate personally. It would be expected that someone who claims to be self-employed would be running their own business (e.g. have a business plan, financial records, an ABN, a regular and frequent level of activity in the business, advertising etc).

The superannuation legislation provides no guidance as to what ‘running a business’ is. However, taxation law does. In particular, paragraph 13 of Tax ruling 97/11 outlines relevant indicators of running a business:

whether the activity has a significant commercial purpose or character;
whether the taxpayer has more than just an intention to engage in business;
whether the taxpayer has a purpose of profit as well as a prospect of profit from the activity;
whether there is repetition and regularity of the activity;
whether the activity is of the same kind and carried on in a similar manner to that of the ordinary trade in that line of business;
whether the activity is planned, organised and carried on in a business-like manner such that it is directed at making a profit;
the size, scale and permanency of the activity; and
whether the activity is better described as a hobby, a form of recreation, or a sporting activity.

Gain or reward is not defined in the superannuation legislation and therefore takes its ordinary meaning. The Macquarie Dictionary defines gain as ‘to get an increase, addition or profit’. Reward is defined as ‘something given or received in return for service, merit, hardship, etc’.

In the context of satisfying the gainful employment definition, it follows that the service, merit, or hardship must be completed with some expectation of an increase, addition, or profit. That is, there must be a direct link (or nexus) between the activity undertaken and the reward provided for the activity. The actual level or amount of gain or reward does not necessarily have to be commensurate with the level of effort or activity undertaken. So, the level of reward could be relatively small yet still suffice – as long as there is a direct link to the activity being performed. Further, the reward doesn’t necessarily have to be received as cash, but could be received as services, fringe benefits, or other valuable consideration.

The gain or reward element is typically difficult to satisfy in the case of charity or volunteer work. Non-paid work for a charity, for example, would clearly not qualify as gainful employment. Mere reimbursement of expenses would not seem to constitute gain or reward.

Also, as discussed earlier, gainful employment for superannuation purposes requires an individual to be either employed or self-employed. Most charities or volunteer organisations will not consider their charity or volunteer workers to be employees.

Transition to retirement pensions – impacts of meeting retirement condition of release

Transition to Retirement Income Stream (TRIS) condition of release allows a member to access their superannuation as a non-commutable income stream once they have reached preservation age called a Transition to Retirement Income Stream- Accumulation Phase (TRIS – Accumulation Phase) . A non-commutable income stream for TRIS purposes is subject to a maximum annual draw down of 10% per annum. Preserved Benefits cannot be accessed through a TRIS as a lump sum until it meets the new “Pension phase” position.

From 1 July 2017 the tax exemption on investment earnings supporting a TRIS – Accumulation Phase is no longer available. The actual income stream (pension payments) will still be tax free after 60. However, a TRIS will regain its tax exempt status once the ‘retirement’ condition of release is subsequently satisfied, for example, where the individual terminates employment at any stage on or after age 60. Its a fairly simple process to confirm to your Pension provider that you have met that further condition of release and they may authomatically move you to Transition to Retirement Income Stream- Retirement Phase (TRIS – Retirement Phase) at 65 anyway, but its worth confirming with them in writing.

It will be vital for SMSF trustees to immediately contact their Accountant/Administrator should the member retire permanently from the workforce, or terminate employment on or after age 60. When the administrator is notified that a no cashing restriction condition of release occurs (eg retirement), the balance of the TRIS account (at that stage) will be converted to a Retirement phase account-based pension (ABP), and the tax exemption on earnings will apply. However, it will then also count towards the individual’s $1.6 – $1.9m million pension transfer balance cap and needs to be reported to the ATO within the new reporting guidelines

Reaching age 65 will automatically result in a TRIS pension becoming a Transition to Retirement Income Stream- Retirement Phase (TRIS – Retirement Phase) and obtaining tax exemption on earnings, if within the individual’s $1.6-$1.9 million pension transfer balance cap.

Evidencing cessation of gainful employment

The cessation must be genuine. Genuine terminations of employment will typically involve the payment of accrued benefits, such as annual and long service leave. SMSF trustees should retain written evidence of the member’s cessation of gainful employment on file and copy to the administrator so the fund auditor has access.

Penalties apply to members, trustees and those who promote ‘illegal early access schemes’ to improperly access superannuation prior to meeting a condition of release.

I hope this guidance has been helpful and please take the time to comment. Feedback always appreciated. Please reblog, retweet, like on Facebook etc to make sure we get the news out there. As always please contact me if you want to look at your own options. We have offices in Castle Hill and Windsor but can meet clients anywhere in Sydney or via Teams or Zoom. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus FSSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02 9899 3693, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 NORWEST NSW 2153

40/8 Victoria Ave, Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 34 605 438 042, AFSL 476223

3 Comments

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on August 5, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in Checklists, Investment Strategies, SMSF Management

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on August 5, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/08/05/the-importance-of-the-retirement-condition-of-release-post-1-july-2017/

Hit by the $1.6m Transfer Balance Cap – Maybe you can get the CSHC

There are all sorts of unexpected consequences coming out of the changes to the superannuation rules. As a result of moving funds over $1.6m back to accumulation to meet the Transfer Balance Cap (TBC), you may in fact now qualify for the Commonwealth Seniors Health Care card.

How?

There may be a silver lining to the new $1.6 million transfer balance cap (TBC) for some SMSF members. Having less money in an account based pension and more money in accumulation or other assets may result in some SMSF members being entitled to receive the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card (CSHC). This is because amounts held in accumulation phase are not deemed for the CSHC and are not included in a member’s personal taxable income.

Now if the excess over the $1.6m is/was withdrawn out of superannuation, whether it will count as income for the CHSC will depend on how the client invests it. for example financial investments such as shares, rented investment property and interest will be deemed but a Holiday home not rented out will not be deemed towards the CSHC income test.

Older pensions may be even more forgiving!

Income from an account based pension is deemed under the usual Centrelink deeming rates unless the account based pension commenced before 1 January 2015, and the client was entitled to the card before 1 January 2015 and continues to hold the card. This is known as the grandfathering rules.

For SMSF members who are not eligible for the grandfathering rules, holding a significant amount of money in an account based pension means that they have a lower likelihood of being eligible for a CSHC. Prior to 1 July 2017, for most SMSF members it was more beneficial to hold as much as possible in an account based pension for tax purposes even if this meant they were ineligible for the CSHC. The tax savings on the excess would have outstripped the CSHC benefit.

However, from 1 July 2017, SMSF members can only hold up to $1.6 million in an account based pension and if they are also receiving defined benefit pension income the amount which can be held in account based pensions will be lower. Depending on other income the member receives, this may result in them now being entitled to the CSHC.

You don’t believe me? The following example explains how this works in a simple scenario:

Example – single person

James is single and is age 67. In the 2016 -2017 financial year, he had $2 million in his account based pension, and no other income.

The deemed income from his account based pension is calculated as $64,247 based on deeming rates and thresholds as at 1 July 2017. His deemed income exceeds the income threshold of $52,796 for the CSHC and therefore he is not entitled to a CSHC.

On 30 June 2017, he rolls $400,000 back to accumulation leaving $1.6million in his account based pension.

The deemed income on $1.6 million is $51,247 and is under the income threshold of $52,796 (20 March 2017) meaning that James is entitled to a CSHC after rolling back money from his account based pension to accumulation.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

Leave a comment

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on July 25, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in Centrelink, CHSC, Financial Planning, Pension Strategies, Retirement Planning

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on July 25, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/07/25/hit-by-the-1-6m-transfer-balance-cap-maybe-you-can-get-the-cshc/

Shares101 – Free Educational Video Course on Investing in Shares

I am always on the lookout for good Australian educational content for new SMSF trustees and I know many people enjoy content delivered in short videos. Today we have another guest post but one with a difference.

Owen Raszkiewicz from Rask Finance has a passion for delivering free educational content and has just completed his 15 part video course which is an introduction to investing in shares, managed funds and ETFs. The course is suitable for those starting out and a good refresher for experienced investors trying to explain concepts to other trustees. He has kindly agreed to me providing these 15 1-2 minute bite size videos here on my blog for you.

So off we go:

And finally for those looking at investing in direct shares overseas

I hope this course has been helpful and please scroll down to comment and make sure to visit Owen’s webpage Rask Finance for more educational content or follow him on twitter @OwenRask .

Feedback always appreciated. Please reblog, retweet, like on Facebook etc to make sure we get this educational material out there. As always please contact me if you want to look at your own planning needs or an SMSF review. We have offices in Castle Hill and Windsor but can meet clients anywhere in Sydney or via Skype. Just click the Schedule Now button up on the left to find the appointment options.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

Leave a comment

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on July 4, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in Franking Credits, Investment Strategies, Investor Education

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on July 4, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/07/04/shares101-free-educational-video-course-on-investing-in-shares/

Why do SMSF Trustees need an enduring power of attorney (EPOA)?

Not only do SMSF members need to have an up-to-date will but everyone who is a member of an SMSF needs to also put into place an enduring power of attorney.

The Australian Law Reform Commission’s (ALRC) recommendations in its final report titled “Elder Abuse – A National Legal Response” are positive steps towards helping mitigate the risks that could face ageing self-managed super fund (SMSF) members.

It involves changes to the superannuation laws to ensure that trustees consider planning for the loss of capacity of an SMSF member and estate planning as part of a fund’s investment strategy, and for the ATO to be told when an individual becomes a trustee of an SMSF because of an enduring power of attorney (EPOA).

TRUSTING SOMEONE TO DEAL WITH YOUR FINANCIAL MATTERS IF YOU CAN’T
An enduring power of attorney (EPOA) deals with your finances if you lose capacity or are unable to attend to financial matters personally and/or as a trustee of your SMSF. Your attorney is able to deal with your assets in the same way that you deal with them (subject to any directions or limitations and being appointed as a director of the SMSF Corporate Trustee). This includes signing tax returns and financial statements of the fund, buying and selling real estate or shares, accessing bank accounts and spending money on behalf of yourself personally and on your behalf as trustee of your SMSF.

For an EPOA to take your place as Trustee you must resign and they are appointed in your place. They cannot manage affairs of the SMSF using the EPOA alone, they must be made a trustee or a trustee director.

This is because if a member loses their mental capacity, perhaps through having a stroke or suffering onset of dementia, they will no longer be able to be a trustee of their fund, or a director of the corporate trustee, putting at risk the complying status of the fund.

Another occasion may be if a member departs overseas indefinitely. In this case their enduring attorney in Australia can become the trustee or director of the trustee in their place to avoid fund residency issues under subsection 295-95(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997.

Scenario we handled: Judith’s father was in the UK and had a fall. She flew back to check he was ok but found it was worse than expected and that he would need multiple surgeries and rehab over a protracted period and she would need to be there most of the time to manage the process and care for him. Her son, James, was her EPOA so she resigned as Director of the Trustee Company and James used the Enduring Power of Attorney to allow him to be appointed as director with her 2nd husband for the 3 year period she was away.

If you do not address the situation within the six-month period of grace allowed under section s17A(4) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), the consequences for the fund and your retirement savings could be very serious indeed and attract severe penalties.

Unlike a general power of attorney, an EPOA continues to operate in the event that you lose capacity.

WHY SHOULD YOU HAVE A TRUSTED ENDURING POWER OF ATTORNEY?

It is important to have an EPOA in place for each fund member because without it, in the event that you lose capacity, your next of kin would have to make an application to the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (or relevant government body in your state) to obtain a financial management order to deal with your assets. This lengthy (often more than the 6 month grace period allowed under the SIS Act) and costly process can be avoided if you have the foresight to establish your EPOA in advance. It can also lead to major friction in the family and especially with blended families and outcomes you did not expect or wish for under any circumstances!

EPOA SHOULD BE SOMEONE YOU TRUST AND CONSIDER APPOINTING SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEYS

We recommend that you seek legal advice and arrange for an EPOA to be prepared covering your personal finances and SMSF role. You may like to appoint your spouse, adult child, accountant, lawyer, business partner or close friend as your attorney in the first instance. Our legal advisers also suggest appointing substitute attorneys in case your primary attorney is unwilling or unable to act. We had one case where father had dementia but son who was EPOA was on secondment to PNG so could not take up the power of attorney

Your nominated attorney should be someone whom you trust and believe would make decisions in your best interests. I often recommend that you leave written details of your preferences for dealing with asset sales, buy backs, dividend reinvestment plans, term deposit maturities, minimum pensions and add clear instructions if they should work with trusted advisers like Financial planners, accountants and auditors before making major decisions.

You should of course consider having reversionary pensions or non-lapsing binding death nominations to ensure as much as possible that your wishes are carried out.

So when next reviewing your wills and powers of attorney just ask your solicitor if they are confident that the EPOA would also cover Superannuation matters or if that should be specifically mentioned.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

3 Comments

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on June 15, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in Binding Death Nominations, Enduring Power of Attorney, Reversionary Pension, SMSF Management, Trustee

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on June 15, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/06/15/why-do-smsf-trustees-need-an-enduring-power-of-attorney-epoa/

How Much Can I Earn Tax Free Outside of my SMSF

Client Question : My next question is about the threshold income level at which my wife and I will start to pay personal tax in 2017-18. I read “about $28,000” in the paper the other day for my situation (age >65), but my wife does not turn 65 until 2018, so her tax-free level may be different. It would be useful to know these numbers in the case we decide to take some lump sums out of super because of the new limits. We are considering investing some money tax-free in our personal names, free of SMSF red tape.

Personal Tax-free Thresholds
The amount you can earn before you have to pay tax, actually depends on your age.

Under 65

For those people under age 65, the effective tax-free threshold is currently $20,542. How do we calculate this amount? Well, if you look at the ATO’s current Individual income tax rate table, you pay no tax on the first $18,200 you earn in a year.

However, you also get the benefit of the full low income tax offset if you earn below $37,000. That means the tax office will offset up to $445 from the tax you would normally have to pay. So you can earn another couple of thousand dollars before you have to pay tax.

How much can I earn before paying taxes after age 65

For those who have reached age pension age, they can earn even more without paying tax. If you are over 65, you get access to the Seniors and Pensioners Tax Offset (SAPTO). This reduces or eliminates the tax that would normally be liable to pay on some additional income

Using the SAPTO benefit, the amount you can earn each year as a pensioner before having to pay tax, is:

$32,279 for single people,
$28,974 each for members of a couple or $57,948 combined.

The beauty of this benefit is that for clients in SMSF Pension phase any income drawn from a super fund income stream once over 60 is tax-free and non-assessable, meaning it doesn’t count towards the above thresholds.

Based on an earnings rate of 5% this means that a couple could have over $500,000 in each of their names and not pay any tax. But be careful as if you are investing in growth assets then triggering capital gains in the future may mean exceeding these thresholds where as within the SMSF the CGT on pension assets is NIL and 10-15% in accumulation.

Also consider the tax position if you are likely:

to receive an inheritance
large capital gain on an asset he’d outside super
to have one parter live significantly longer (they may end up with large amounts outside the super system)

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

Tax free Image courtesy of Stuart Miles /FreeDigitalPhotos.net

1 Comment

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on May 30, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in Tax Planning

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on May 30, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/05/30/how-much-can-i-earn-tax-free-outside-of-my-smsf/

SMSF Game Changer – proposed monthly Transfer Balance Account Reporting to shake up Accountant services

What seems like a worthwhile SMSF reporting requirement to help trustees that is being introduced from next year has potential to push local accountants out of the SMSF administration sector and play into the hands of major administrators.

In order to help administer the new transfer balance cap reporting, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is in the process of developing a self managed superannuation fund (SMSF) event based reporting regime. This new regime is likely to be in the form of a report to be called the Transfer Balance Account Report or TBAR. (Don’t you love another 4 letter acronym).

At this stage nothing has been finalised but the TBAR reporting regime is expected to be as follows:

Where the event is a pension being commuted (ie stopped) in part or in full or a rollover occurs – that must be reported to the ATO with 10 business days after the end of the month that the event occurs.
Where the event is the commencement of a pension – that must be reported within 28 days of the end of the quarter that the event occurs.

Transition Period

The ATO is also expected to introduce a transition period for events that occur in the first part of the 2018 year (ie from 1 July 2017):

Where the event is the commencement or commutation of a pension, that event does not need to be reported until the SMSF is due to lodge its 2017 tax return (typically before May 2018)
However, all events that occur after that date have to be reported in the normal manner (ie monthly or quarterly)
The transition period will not apply to some events – such as rollovers

For many accounting practitioners, and SMSF trustees, this will be a fundamental change in how they manage the administer of their SMSFs. Where an SMSF trustee needs to commence, or commute a pension they can no longer see their accountant / administrator once a year. They will have to see their administrator before, or soon after, an event occurs. While accountants may have to prepare “real time” accounts so that they can lodge such reports. They will find it hard to pass on the additional costs to trustees and many will just not be able to cope with regular reporting.

Timing Problem

It is unlikely that many, if any, existing SMSFs administered by suburban accountants are capable of reporting on a monthly basis. For example, just a simple end of year reconsolidation of accumulation and pensions will now be reportable by the 10th August each year but many tax reports from investment managers, AREITS and platforms don’t come out until after this date. We presently minute the request on 1 July but finalise implementing on receipt of financials later in the year.

Don’t panic: Many SMSFs will have no TBAR reporting obligations because they have no pensions or they are not starting any new pensions or commuting any existing pensions.

However, if you are an SMSF trustee that maybe affected by the new Transfer Balance Account Report (TBAR) regime, you should ensure that your accountant / administrator have systems, staffing and processes in place that will enable your fund to comply with this new reporting obligation.

Liam Shorte B.Bus SSA™ AFP

Financial Planner & SMSF Specialist Advisor™

Tel: 02　98941844, Mobile: 0413 936 299

PO Box 6002 BHBC, Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

5/15 Terminus St. Castle Hill NSW 2154

Corporate Authorised Representative of Viridian Select Pty Ltd ABN 41 621 447 345, AFSL 51572

2 Comments

by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on May 25, 2017 • Permalink

Posted in News & Stats, Pensions, Retirement Planning, SMSF Management

Posted by SMSF Coach - Liam Shorte on May 25, 2017

https://smsfcoach.com.au/2017/05/25/smsf-game-changer-proposed-monthly-transfer-balance-account-reporting-to-shake-up-accountant-services/

Search for specific topics

Search for:

Recent Posts
Previous Posts by Topic
- Contribution Strategies (87)
  - In Specie transfers (7)
  - Salary Sacrifice (16)
  - Small Business CGT (2)
  - Superannuation Splitting (19)
  - Tax Planning (68)
- education (21)
- Education costs (2)
- Estate Planning (41)
  - Anti-Detriment (1)
  - Binding Death Nominations (17)
  - Enduring Power of Attorney (7)
  - Reversionary Pension (15)
  - testamentary trust (1)
- Financial Planning (68)
  - Bankruptcy Protection (1)
  - Contributions (10)
  - Divorce (5)
  - downsizing (9)
  - Superannuation (30)
- Insurance Strategies (16)
  - Income Protection (3)
  - Life Insurance (7)
  - Salary Continuance (3)
  - Total & Permanent Disability (4)
- Investment Strategies (77)
  - Asset Allocation (22)
  - Behavioural Finance (3)
  - Bonds (5)
  - Borrowing (24)
    - Loans (12)
    - LRBA (17)
  - Botcoin (3)
  - Buy-backs (1)
  - Franking Credits (14)
  - Hybrids (3)
  - International Investing (7)
  - Investor Education (8)
  - Property (29)
  - Results Season (2)
  - Term Deposits (7)
- Retirement Planning (97)
  - Age Pension (7)
  - Centrelink (20)
    - CHSC (2)
  - Downsizing (1)
  - Lifestyle (4)
  - Pension Strategies (40)
  - Pensions (39)
- SMSF (108)
  - News & Stats (50)
- SMSF alternatives (2)
- SMSF Management (128)
  - Audit (23)
  - Checklists (26)
  - Deeds (1)
  - Scam Alert (4)
  - SMSF Exit Strategies (2)
  - TBAR reporting (4)
  - Trustee (76)
Like us on Facebook

Like us on Facebook
Blog Stats
- 879,618 hits

Liam Shorte

IFA 2023 Excellence Awards – SMSF Advisor of the Year – Finalist

Get advice – Have a chat

Free Email Updates

Top Posts & Pages

Connect with me

All posts tagged Retirement

Share this:

Share this:

Why Bill Shorten is wrong — and right — on dividends

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

At SMSF Coach and our Financial Planning arm Verante, we believe in your financial wellbeing and improving your understanding of financial concepts.

Watch this short video which explains what is available in this vast knowledge base.

No Credit Card required.

It includes a whole module on SMSF education and

Self-Managed Super Funds section includes:

Share this:

Don’t be the one who leaves a mess behind!

Share this:

Reversionary pensions

Pensions

Transition to retirement income streams

Share this:

Do Your Sums Before Downsizing

1.1 The Clients

1.2 Assumptions

1.3 Scenario 1: Retain Current Home

1.4 Scenario 2: Downsizing Family Home in 2016/17

1.5 Scenario 3: Downsizing Family Home in 2027/28

1.6 Comparing the Scenarios

1.7 Conclusions

1.8 Pathfinder Learnings

Share this:

What is the Retirement condition of release

Conditions of release – overview

Retirement condition of release

Age 60 but less than 65

Transition to retirement pensions – impacts of meeting retirement condition of release

Share this:

How?

Older pensions may be even more forgiving!

You don’t believe me? The following example explains how this works in a simple scenario:

Share this:

Share this:

Not only do SMSF members need to have an up-to-date will but everyone who is a member of an SMSF needs to also put into place an enduring power of attorney.

WHY SHOULD YOU HAVE A TRUSTED ENDURING POWER OF ATTORNEY?

EPOA SHOULD BE SOMEONE YOU TRUST AND CONSIDER APPOINTING SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEYS

Share this:

Under 65

How much can I earn before paying taxes after age 65

Share this:

Transition Period

Timing Problem

Share this:

Search for specific topics

Recent Posts

Previous Posts by Topic

Blog Stats